Workarounds and test results follow-up in electronic health record-based primary care

Applied Clinical Informatics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 543-559

  Menon, Shailaja ^a,b   Murphy, Daniel R ^a,b   Singh, Hardeep ^a,b   Meyer, Ashley N D ^a,b   Sittig, Dean F ^c  

^a MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic test result follow up; Missed test results; Paper based methods; Workarounds

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LABORATORY TECHNIQUE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; WORKFLOW; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CLINICAL LABORATORY TECHNIQUES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WORKFLOW; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84981308188     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18690327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2015-10-RA-0135     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Singh H, Naik AD, Rao R, Petersen LA. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23(4): 489-494. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0393-z. PubMed PMID: 18373151.
2. Hysong SJ, Sawhney MK, Wilson L, Sittig DF, Esquivel A, Singh S, Singh H. Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011; 11: 22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-22. PubMed PMID: 21486478.
3. Saleem JJ, Russ AL, Justice CF, Hagg H, Ebright PR, Woodbridge PA, Doebbeling BN. Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78(9): 618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 21. PubMed PMID:19464231.
4. Van Der Sijs H, Rootjes I, Aarts J. The shift in workarounds upon implementation of computerized physician order entry. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 169: 290-4. PubMed PMID:21893759.
5. Gasser L. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Information System(TOIS) 1986; 4 (3): 205-225. doi10.1145/214427.214429.
6. Friedman A, Crosson JC, Howard J, Clark EC, Pellerano M, Karsh BT, Crabtree B, Jaen CR, Cohen DJ. A typology of electronic health record workarounds in small-to-medium size primary care practices. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21(1): 78-83. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001686. Epub 2013 Jul 31.PubMed PMID: 23904322.
7. Casalino LP, Dunham D, Chin MH, Bielang R, Kistner EO, Karrison TG, Ong MK, Sarkar U, McLaughlin MA, Meltzer DO. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169(12): 1123-1129. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.130. PubMed PMID:19546413.
8. Flanagan ME, Saleem JJ, Millitello LG, Russ AL, Doebbeling BN. Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20(1): 59-66. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000982. Epub 2013 Mar 14. PMID: 23492593.
9. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, Sittig D, Arora H, Espadas D, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med 2009; 169(17): 1578-1586. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed2009.263. PubMed PMID:19786677.
10. Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Georqiou A, Li J. Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2012; (10): 1334-1348. Epub 2011 Dec 20. PubMed PMID:22183961.
11. Elder NC, McEwen TR, Flach JM, Gallimore JJ. Management of Test Results in Family Medicine Offices. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7(4): 343-351. doi: 10.1370/afm.961. PubMed PMID:19597172
12. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Sittig DF, Wilson L, Espadas D, Khan MM, Petersen LA.. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med 2010; 123: 238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.07.027. PubMed PMID:20193832.
13. Debono DS, Greenfield D, Travaglia JF, Long JC, Black D, Johnson J, Braithwaite J. Nurses’ workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-175. PubMed PMID:23663305.
14. Collins SA, Fred M, Wilcox L, Vawdrey DK. Workarounds Used by Nurses to Overcome Design Constraints of Electronic Health Records. NI 2012: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics 2012; 2012: 093. eCollection 2012. PubMed PMID:24199061.
15. Halbesleben JR, Savage GT, Wakefield DS, Wakefield BJ. Rework and workarounds in nurse medication administration process: implications for work processes and patient safety. Health Care Manage Rev 2010; 35(2): 124-133. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181d116c2. PubMed PMID:20234219.
16. Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13(5): 547-556. Epub 2006 Jun 23. PubMed PMID:16799128.
17. Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, Karsh BT. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2008; 15(4): 408-423. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2616. Epub 2008 Apr 24. PubMed PMID:18436903.
18. Rack LL, Dudjak LA, Wolf GA. Study of nurse workarounds in a hospital using bar code medication administration system. J Nurs Care Qual 2012; 27(3): 232-239. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e318240a854. PubMed PMID:22202186.
19. Saleem JJ, Russ AL, Neddo A, Blades PT, Doebbeling BN, Foresman BH. Paper persistence, workarounds, and communication breakdowns in computerized consultation management. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80(7): 466-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 May 6. PubMed PMID:21530383.
20. Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Smith MW, Murphy DR, Espadas D, Laxmisan A, Sittig DF. Primary care practitioners’ views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2013; 20(4): 727-735. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267. Epub 2012 Dec 25. PubMed PMID:23268489.
21. Weber R P. Basic Content Analysis. 2 nd ed. SAGE University paper series on Quantitative Applications in Social Seciences, ISBN.0-8039-3863-2. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1990.
22. Kim J, Mueller C. Introduction to factor analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical issues.. Uslaner EM, editor. University paper series on Quantitative Applications in Social Seciences. ISBN 0-8039-1166-1. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1978.
23. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62(1): 107-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x PubMed PMID:18352969.
24. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Poon EG, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra RH. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14(4): 415-423. Epub 2007 Apr 25. PubMed PMID: 17460127.
25. Westphal J, Lancaster R, Park D. (2014). Work-arounds observed by fourth-year nursing students. Western J of Nursing Research 2013; 36(8):1002 -1018. PubMed PMID:24284278.
26. Bates DW, Boyle DL., Teich JM. Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of Computer Appllications in Medical Care 1994; 996. PubMed PMID:7950101.
27. Murphy DR, Reis B, Sittig DF, Singh H. Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med 2012; 125(2): 209-217. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.029. PubMed PMID:22269625.
28. Ferneley EH, Sobreperez P. Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. Eur J Infom Sys. 2006; (15): 345-356. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000629
29. Sparnon E. Spotlight on Electronic Health Record Errors: Paper or Electronic Hybrid Workflows. Patient Saf Advis 2013; 10(2): 55-58. Available from: http://patientsafetyauthority.org/ADVISORIES/AdvisoryLibrary/2013/sep;10(3)/Pages/92.aspx