Temporal scales, ecosystem dynamics, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystems services

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 21, Issue , 2016, Pages 109-119

  Hein, Lars ^a   van Koppen, C S A K ^a   van Ierland, Ekko C ^a   Leidekker, Jakob ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Foundation National Park De Hoge Veluwe   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; National park; Stakeholder preferences; Temporal scales; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981249408     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J., World agriculture towards 2030/2050. The 2012 Revision. Global Perspective Studies Team. 2012, FAO, Rome.
2. Atkinson, G., Bateman, I., Mourato, S., Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 28 (2012), 22–47.
3. Bagstad, K.J., et al. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol. Soc., 19(2), 2014, 64.
4. Bateman, I.J., Mace, G.M., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G., Turner, K., Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48 (2011), 177–218.
5. Bateman, I.J., Harwood, A.R., Mace, G.M., Watson, R.T., Abson, D.J., Andrews, B., Binner, A., Crowe, A., 6 BH. Day, et al. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341 (2013), 45–50.
6. Beckerman, W., Hepburn, C., Ethics of the discount rate in the stern review on the economics of climate change. World Econ. 8 (2007), 187–210.
7. Bell, S., Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T., Pröbstl, U., Simpson, M., Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: a European perspective. Living Rev. Landsc. Res. 1 (2007), 1–46.
8. Boithias, L., Terrado, M., Corominasa, L., Ziv, G., Kumar, V., Marqués, M., Schuhmacher, M., Acuña, V., Analysis of the uncertainty in the monetary valuation of ecosystem services — a case study at the river basin scale. Sci. Total Environ. 543 (2016), 683–690.
9. Buijs, A.E., Van Koppen, C.S.A., Draagvlak in een veranderende samenleving. De Levende Nat. 114 (2013), 36–40.
10. Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R.S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. Miguel, Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A., Science for managing ecosystem services: neyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009), 1305–1312.
11. Christensen, N.L., Bartuska, A.M., Brown, J.H., Carpenter, S., D'Antonio, C., Francis, R., Franklin, J.F., MacMahon, J.A., Noss, R.F., Parsons, D.J., Peterson, C.H., Turner, M.G., Woodmansee, R.G., The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 6 (1996), 665–691.
12. Cocks, M., Biocultural diversity: moving beyound the realm of 'indigenous' and 'local' people. Hum. Ecol. 34 (2006), 185–200.
13. Carpenter, S.R., Bennett, E.M., Peterson, G.D., Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol. Soc., 11(1), 2006, 29 URL: 〈 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art29/〉.
14. Carpenter, S.R., Cole, J.J., Pace, M.L., Batt, R., Brock, W.A., Cline, T., Coloso, J., Hodgson, J.R., Kitchell, J.F., Seekell, D.A., Smith, L., Weidel, B., Early warnings of regime shifts: a whole-ecosystem experiment. Science 332 (2011), 1079–1082.
15. Chen, X., Önal, H., Modeling agricultural supply response using mathematical programming and crop mixes. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 94:3 (2012), 674–686.
16. Ceronsky, Megan, Anthoff, David, Hepburn, Cameron J., Tol, Richard S.J., 2011. Checking the Price Tag on Catastrophe: The Social Cost of Carbon under Non-linear Climate Response. Working Paper No. 392, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
17. Cordell, H.K., Betz, C.J., Green, G.T., Nature-based outdoor recreation trends and wilderness. Int. J. Wilderness 14 (2008), 7–13.
18. Daily, G.C., Matson, P.A., Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008), 9455–9456.
19. Dıaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., et al. The IPBES conceptual framework — connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 1–16.
20. De Bruin, T., Recreational use of National Park De Hoge Veluwe (De recreatieve betekenis van het Nationale Park De Hoge Veluwe), 1988, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
21. Derks, G.J.M., Crols, R.J.A., Hoenselaars, J.C., Bouwmeester, H.M.P., 2007. Cultural-historical analysis of National Park De Hoge Veluwe (In Dutch: Cultuurhistorische analyse het Nationale Park De Hoge Veluwe). Gelders Genootschap, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
22. Díaz, S., et al. The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 1–16.
23. Dublin, H.T., Sinclair, A.R., Glade, J., Elephants and fires as causes of multiple steady states in the Serengeti-Mara woodlands. J. Anim. Ecol. 59 (1990), 1147–1164.
24. Dupouey, J.L., Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83 (2002), 2978–2984.
25. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit. 40:2 (2002), 351–401.
26. Freeman, R.E., Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. 1984, Pitman, Boston.
27. Friedel, M.H., Range condition assessment and the concept of thresholds: a viewpoint. J. Range Manag. 44 (1991), 422–426.
28. Givoni, B., Impact of planted areas on urban environmental quality: a review. Atmos. Environ. Part B: Urban Atmos. 25 (1991), 289–299.
29. Goodale, V.L., Apps, M.J., Birdsey, R.A., Field, C.B., Heath, L.S., Houghton, R.A., Jenkins, Jennifer C., Kohlmaier, Gundolf H., Kurz, Werner, Liu, Shirong, Nabuurs, Gert-Jan, Nilsson, Sten, Shvidenko, Anatoly Z., Forest carbon sinks in the northern hemisphere. Ecol. Appl. 12 (2002), 891–899.
30. Graham, N.A.J., Wilson, S.K., Jennings, S., Polunin, N.V.C., Robinson, J.A.N., et al. Lag effects in the impacts of mass coral bleaching on coral reef fish, fisheries, and ecosystems. Conserv. Biol. 21 (2007), 1291–1300.
31. Grêt-Regamey, A., Brunner, S.H., Altwegg, J., Bebi, P., Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 127:Supplement (2013), S145–S154.
32. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Access through 〈www.cices.eu〉.
33. Harris, G., This is not the end of limnology (or of science): the world may be a lot simpler than we think. Freswater Biol. 42 (1999), 689–706.
34. Hein, L., Assessing the costs of eutrophication control in a shallow lake ecosystem subject to two steady states. Ecol. Econ. 59 (2006), 429–439.
35. Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R.S., van Ierland, E.C., Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 57 (2006), 209–228.
36. Hein, L., Economic benefits generated by protected areas: the case of the Hoge Veluwe Forest, The Netherlands. Ecol. Soc., 16, 2011, 13 URL: 〈 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art13/〉.
37. Hein, L., Edens, B., Bagstad, K., Obst, C., 2015a. A perspective on capacity in the context of ecosystem accounting. Discussion Paper UN Expert Forum on Ecosystem Accounting, May 2015, New York.
38. Hein, L., Obst, C., Edens, B., Remme, R.P., Progress and challenges in the development of ecosystem accounting as a tool to analyse ecosystem capital. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 86–92.
39. Hofman, P.B., Haak, A.C., 2006. De Hoge Veluwe van 1935 tot 1950. Vereniging Vrienden van de Hoge Veluwe, Hoenderloo, 1950.
40. Holling, C.S., The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. Clark, W.C., Munn, R.E., (eds.) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, 1986, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L.H., Resilience and adaptive cycles. Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., (eds.) 2002: Panarchy, Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, 2002, Island Press, Washington, London, 25–62.
42. Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L.H., Peterson, G.D., Sustainability and panarchies. Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., (eds.) 2002: Panarchy, Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, 2002, Island Press, Washington, London, 63–103.
43. Howarth R.B., Norgaard, R.B., 1991. Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development. The American Economic Review 82 (2). Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May 1992), pp. 473–477.
44. Jansen, E., van Dobben, H.F., Is decline of cantharellus cibarius in the Netherlands due to air pollution?. AMBIO 16 (1987), 211–213.
45. Jansen, M., Te Kloeze, J.W., Van der Voet, J.L.M., Recreational Use of National Park De Hoge Veluwe. (Het recreatief gebruik van het Nationale Park De Hoge Veluwe), 1996, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
46. Koch, E.W., Barbier, E.B., Silliman, B.R., Reed, D.J., Perillo, G.M.E., Hacker, S.D., Granek, E.F., Primavera, J.H., Muthiga, N., Polasky, S., Halpern, B.S., Kennedy, C.J., Kappel, C.V., Wolanski, E., Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 (2009), 29–37.
47. Larsen, D.P., Schult, D.W., Malueg, K., Summer internal phosphorus supplies in Shagawa lake, Minnesota. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26 (1981), 740–753.
48. Martín-López, B., et al., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PloS One, 7(6), 2012.
49. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. 2003, Island Press, Washington D.C., USA.
50. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Global Assessment Report, vols. 1–3, 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
51. Murray, A.G., Parslow, J.S., Modelling of nutrient impacts in Port Phillip Bay – a semi-enclosed marine Australian ecosystem. Mar. Freshw. Res. 50 (1999), 597–611.
52. Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K.M.A., Daily, G.C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Lonsdorf, E., Naidoo, R., Ricketts, T.H., Shaw, M., Modelling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 (2009), 4–11.
53. Nijhoff, E., Pelzers, W., Het Hoge Veluwe Boek, 2010, Waandersolsthoorn, Zwolle.
54. Nordhaus, W., 2005. Principles of national accounting for non-market accounts. Working Paper Prepared for CRIW Conference on the Architecture for the National Accounts, January (2005).
55. Norgaard, R.B., Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1219–1227.
56. NRC, Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. 2004, National Research Council, Washington DC, USA.
57. Obst, C., Hein, L., Edens, B., National accounting and the valuation of ecosystem assets and their services. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48:2 (2015), 177–218.
58. Olsthoorn, A., van Hees A., 2001. 40 years of black cherry (Prunus serotina) control in the Netherlands: lessons for management of invasive tree species. In: Starfinger U and Kowarik I (eds) Biological Invasions – a Challenge to Act? Contributions and results of a conference in Berlin 4–, 43–44.
59. Panayotou T., Ashton, P.S. 1992. Not by Timber Alone: Economics and Ecology for Sustaining Tropical Forests. Island, Washington, DC. 282 pp.
60. Pimm, S.L., The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307 (1984), 321–326.
61. Polasky, S., Carpenter, S.R., Folke, C., Keeler, B., Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:8 (2011), 398–404.
62. Ragland, K.W., Aerts, D.J., Baker, A.J., Properties of wood for combustion analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 37 (1991), 161–168.
63. Remme, P.R., Edens, B., Schröter, M., Hein, L., Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, The Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 112 (2015), 116–128.
64. Rounsevell, M.D.A., Dawson, T.P., Harrison, P.A., A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 19 (2010), 2823–2842.
65. Rustad, L.E., The response of terrestrial ecosystems to global climate change: towards an integrated approach. Sci. Total Environ. 404 (2008), 222–235.
66. Sanchirico, J.N., Springborn, M., How to get there from here: ecological and economic dynamics of ecosystem service provision. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48:2 (2011), 243–267.
67. Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., Walker, B., Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413 (2001), 591–596.
68. Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W., Slow response of societies to new problems: causes and costs. Ecosystems 6 (2003), 493–502.
69. Schneider, S.H., The greenhouse effect: science and policy. Science 243 (1989), 771–781.
70. Schröter, M., Remme, R.P., Sumarga, E., Barton, D.N., Hein, L., Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting. Ecosyst. Serv., 2014, 2014.
71. Simpson, R. David, Christensen, Norman L., (eds.) Ecosystem Function & Human Activities: Reconciling Economics and Ecology, 2012, Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
72. Spash, C.L., How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail. Environ. Values 17 (2008), 259–284.
73. Starfield, A.M., Stuart Chapin, F., Model of transient changes in arctic and boreal vegetation in response to climate and land use change. Ecol. Appl. 6 (1996), 842–864.
74. Steele, J.H., Henderson, E.W., Modelling long-term fluctuations in fish stocks. Science 224 (1984), 985–987.
75. Swart, J.A.A., Van Der Windt, H.J., Keulartz, J., Valuation of nature in conservation and restoration. Restor. Ecol. 9:2 (2001), 230–238.
76. TEEB, 2010. TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Earthscan.
77. Tilman, D., Downing, J.A., Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367 (1994), 363–365.
78. Timms, R.M., Moss, B., Prevention of growth of potentially dense pytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing in presence of zooplanktivorous fish in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29 (1984), 472–486.
79. Thomas, K., Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England, 1984, Penguin Books, London, 1500–1800.
80. Tol, R.S.J., The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 33 (2005), 2064–2074.
81. Tol, R.S.J., The economic effects of climate change. J. Econ. Perspect. 23 (2009), 29–51.
82. Turner, R.K., Morse-Jones, S., Fisher, B., Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1185 (2010), 79–101.
83. UK Government, 2012. Updated Short-Term Traded Carbon Values used for UK Public Policy Appraisal. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.
84. UN et al., 2014. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012, Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. United Nations: New York, USA.
85. UN, et al. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, Technical Recommendations for Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (draft). 2016, United Nations, New York, USA.
86. Van de Koppel, J., Rietkerk, M., van Langevelde, F., Kumar, L., Klausmeier, C.A., et al. Spatial heterogeneity and irreversible vegetation change in semiarid grazing systems. Am. Nat. 159 (2002), 209–218.
87. Van Koppen, C.S.A., Resource, arcadia, lifeworld. Nature concepts in environmental sociology. Sociol. Rural. 40 (2000), 300–318.
88. Van Koppen, C.S.A., Governing nature? On the global complexity of biodiversity conservation. Spaargaren, G., Mol, A.P.J., Buttel, F.H., (eds.) Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to Social Theory, 2006, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 187–219.
89. Van Koppen, C.S.A., Dutch nature protection between policy and public. Van Koppen, C.S.A., Markham, W.T., (eds.) Protecting Nature. Organizations and Networks in Europe and the USA, 2007, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 140–164.
90. Vatn, A., Environmental valuation and rationality. Land Econ. 80:1 (2004), 1–18.
91. Vos, P.E.J., Maiheu, B., Vankerkom, J., Janssen, S., Improving local air quality in cities: to tree or not to tree?. Environ. Pollut. 183 (2013), 113–122.
92. Walker, B.H., Rangeland ecology: understanding and managing change. AMBIO 22 (1993), 80–87.
93. Walker, B., Pearson, L., Harris, M., Maler, K.-G., Li, C.-Z., Biggs, R., Incorporating resilience in the assessment of inclusive wealth: an example from South East Australia. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45:2 (2010), 183–202.
94. Willemen, L., L. Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M.E.F., Verburg, P.H., Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecol. Indic. 10 (2010), 62–73.
95. Willemsen, G.F., 1987. RIN Rapport 87/6, Leersum.
96. Woods, A., Stedman-Edwards, P., Mang, J., The Root Causes of Biodiversity Loss, 2000, Earthscan, London.
97. Wunder, S., Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 65 (2008), 834–852.
98. Young, O.R., Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Glob. Environ. Change 20 (2010), 378–385.