Talking to visitors about conservation: Exploring message communication through docent–visitor interactions at zoos

Visitor Studies

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 151-162

  Mony, Preethi R S ^a   Heimlich, Joe E ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981233252     PISSN: 10645578     EISSN: 19347715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10645570802355513     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, U. S., Kelling, A. S., Pressley-Keough, R., Bloomsmith, M. A., and Maple, T. L., 2003. Enhancing the zoo visitor's experience by public animal training and oral interpretation at an otter exhibit. Environment and Behavior., 35:826–841.
2. Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2005. The 2006 AZA membership directory, Silver Spring, MD:Author.
3. Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., and Dierking, L., 2007. Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings:Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research., 13:367–383.
4. Birney, B. A., and Shaha, S., Dosage versus distribution:The support of docents on zoo visitors' acquisition of knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums. Birmingham, AL.
5. Bitgood, S., Patterson, D., and Benefield, A., 1988. Exhibit design and visitor behavior:Empirical relationships. Environment and Behavior., 20:474–491.
6. Broad, G., 1996. Visitor profile and evaluation of informal education at Jersey Zoo. The Dodo Journal of Wildlife Preservation Trusts., 32:166–192.
7. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., 1998. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers:A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 74:1516–1530.
8. Garling, T., Biel, A., and Gustafsson, M., 2002. “ The new environmental psychology:The human interdependence paradigm ”. In Handbook of environmental psychology, Edited by:Bechtel, R. B., and Churchman, A., 85–94. New York:Wiley.
9. Harris, L., 1995. Recreation in a zoo environment:Applying animal behavior research techniques to understand how visitors allocate time. Legacy, 6 (2):14–18.
10. Heimlich, J. E., Bronnenkant, K., Witgert, N., and Falk, J. H., 2005. Measuring the learning outcomes of adult visitors to zoos and aquariums:Confirmatory study, Annapolis, MD:Institute of Learning Innovation.
11. Heimlich, J. E., Falk, J. H., Bronnenkant, K., and Barlage, J., 2005. Measuring the learning outcomes of adult visitors to zoos and aquariums:Phase I technical report, Annapolis, MD:Institute for Learning Innovation.
12. Heimlich, J. E., and Storksdieck, M., 2007. Changing thinking about learning for a changing world. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education., 24:63–75.
13. Lindemann-Matthies, P., and Kamer, T., 2006. The influence of an interactive educational approach on visitors' learning in a Swiss zoo. Science Education., 90:296–315.
14. Margulis, S. W., Hoyos, C., and Anderson, M., 2003. Effect of field activity on zoo visitor interest. Zoo Biology., 22:587–599.
15. Morgan, J. M., 2000. Perceptions of a zoological park:A comparative study of educators and visitors. Journal of Interpretation Research, 5 (1):19–33.
16. Powey, K. D., and Rios, J., 2002. Using interpretive animals to deliver affective messages in zoos. Journal of Interpretation Research, 7 (2):19–28.
17. Schnackenberg, H. L., Savenye, W. C., and Jones, H., View the zoo:Evaluation of visual communication in an outdoor educational setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Albuquerque, NM.
18. Swanagan, J., 2000. Factors influencing zoo visitors' conservation attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 31 (4):26–31.
19. Ward, I. P., Mosberger, N., Kistler, C., and Fischer, O., 1998. The relationship between popularity and body size in zoo animals. Conservation Biology., 12:1408–1411.
20. Wolf, R. L., and Tymitz, B. L., 1979. “Do giraffes ever sit?” A study of visitor perceptions at the National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC:Smithsonian Institution. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED196769)