Are Public Master’s Institutions Cost Efficient? A Stochastic Frontier and Spatial Analysis

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 469-496

  Titus, Marvin A ^a   Vamosiu, Adriana ^b   McClure, Kevin R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost efficiency; Public master s institutions; Spatial analysis; Stochastic frontier analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84981186487     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: 1573188X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-016-9434-y     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agasisti, T., & Salerno, C. (2007). Assessing the cost efficiency of Italian universities. Education Economics, 15(4), 455–471.
2. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Berlin: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Anselin, L. (1996). Global Moran’s I Algorithm used in GeoDa: The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. In M. Fischer, H. Scholten, & D. Unwin (Eds.), Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS in environmental and socio-economic sciences (pp. 111–125). London: Taylor and Francis.
4. Arifeen, S., & Mamun, K. (2012). Stochastic estimation of cost frontier: Evidence from Bangladesh. Education Economics, 22(2), 211–227.
5. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332.
6. Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7. Boehner, J. A., & McKeon, H. P. (2003). The college cost crisis (Report of U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce and U.S. House Subcommittee on 21st Century Competitiveness). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
8. Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. New Brunswick: Transaction.
9. Cheslock, J. J., Ortagus, J. C., Umbricht, M. R., & Wymore, J. (2016). The Cost of Producing Higher Education: An Exploration of Theory, Evidence, and Institutional Policy. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31, pp. 349–392). Dordrecht: Springer.
10. Cohn, A., Rhine, S., & Santos, M. (1989). Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: Economies of scale and scope. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 284–290.
11. de Groot, H., McMahon, W. W., & Volkwein, J. F. (1991). The cost structure of American research universities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 424–431.
12. Doyle, W. (2015). Efficiency in degree production among public comprehensive universities. In M. Schneider & K. C. Deane (Eds.), The university next door: What is a comprehensive university, who does it educate, and can it survive? (pp. 93–120). New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1995). Departmental productivity in American universities: Economies of scale and scope. Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 199–244.
14. Forbus, P., Newbold, J. J., & Mehta, S. S. (2011). A study of non-traditional and traditional students in terms of their time management behaviors, stress factors, and coping strategies. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(2), 109–125.
15. Fryar, A. H. (2015). The comprehensive university: How it came to be and what it is now. In M. Schneider & K. C. Deane (Eds.), The university next door: What is a comprehensive university, who does it educate, and can it survive? (pp. 19–42). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Fu, T.-T., Huang, C. J., & Tien, F. F. (2008). University cost structure in Taiwan. Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(4), 651–662.
17. Green, W. H. (2005). Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(1), 7–32.
18. Gros Louis, K. R. R., & Thompson, M. (2002). Responsibility center budgeting and management at Indiana University. In D. M. Priest, W. E. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. P. St. John (Eds.), Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 93–107). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19. Harcleroad, F. F., & Ostar, A. W. (1987). Colleges and universities for change: America’s comprehensive public state colleges and universities. Washington, DC: AASCU Press.
20. Hashimoto, K., & Cohn, E. (1997). Economies of scale and scope in Japanese private universities. Education Economics, 5(2), 107–115.
21. Hearn, J. C., Lewis, D. R., Kallsen, L., Holdsworth, J. M., & Jones, L. M. (2006). “Incentives for managed growth”: A case study of incentives-based planning and budgeting in a large public research university. Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 286–316.
22. Hedrick, D. W., Wassell, C. S, Jr., & Henson, S. E. (2009). Administrative costs in higher education: How fast are they really growing? Education Economics, 17(1), 123–137.
23. Henderson, B. D., & Kane, W. D. (1991). Caught in the middle: Faculty and institutional status and quality in state comprehensive universities. Higher Education, 22(4), 339–350.
24. Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R., & Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: The case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 63–71.
25. Jaquette, O., & Parra, E. E. (2014). Using IPEDS for panel analyses: Core concepts, data challenges, and empirical applications. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXIX, pp. 467–533). Dordrecht: Springer.
26. Jaquette, O., Parra, E., Hillman, N. W., & Curs, B. R. (2013). Using organizational, local, and state-level panel data to conduct policy analyses of organizational change (symposium). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education.
27. Johnes, G. (1996). Multiproduct cost functions and the funding of tuition in UK universities. Applied Economics Letters, 3(9), 557–561.
28. Johnes, G. (1997). Costs and industrial structure in contemporary British higher education. Economic Journal, 107(442), 727–737.
29. Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2009). Higher education institutions’ costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 107–113.
30. Johnes, G., & Schwarzenberger, A. (2011). Differences in cost structure and the evaluation of efficiency: The case of German universities. Education Economics, 19(5), 497–499.
31. Johnstone, B. D., & Marcucci, P. N. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide: Who pays? Who should pay?. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (1999). Economies of scale and scope in higher education: A case of comprehensive universities. Economics of Education Review, 18(2), 269–277.
33. Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (2001). Multi-product total cost function for higher education: A case of Bible Colleges. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), 297–303.
34. Kumbhakar, S., Lien, G., & Hardaker, J. B. (2014). Technical efficiency in competing data models: A study of Norwegian grain farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 321–337.
35. Kumbhakar, S. C., Wang, H., & Horncastle, A. P. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kuo, J., & Ho, Y. (2008). The cost efficiency impact of the university operation fund on public universities in Taiwan. Economics of Education Review, 27(5), 603–612.
37. Laband, N., & Lentz, F. (2003). New estimates of economies of scale and scope in higher education. Southern Economic Journal, 70(July), 172–183.
38. Lenton, P. (2008). The cost structure of higher education in further education colleges in England. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 471–482.
39. Lewis, D. R., & Dundar, H. (1995). Economies of scale and scope in Turkish universities. Education Economics, 3(2), 133–157.
40. Longlong, H., Fengliang, L., & Weifang, M. (2009). Multi-product total cost functions for higher education: The case of Chinese research universities. Economics of Education Review, 28(4), 505–511.
41. McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
42. McMillan, M. L., & Chan, W. H. (2006). University efficiency: A comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and non-stochastic methods. Education Economics, 14(1), 1–30.
43. Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1), 17–23.
44. Morphew, C. (2002). A rose by any other name: Which colleges became universities. The Review of Higher Education, 25(2), 207–224.
45. Morphew, C. C., & Baker, B. D. (2004). The cost of prestige: Do new research I universities incur higher administrative costs? The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 365–384.
46. Nelson, R., & Heverth, K. T. (1992). Effect of class size on economies of scale and marginal costs in higher education. Applied Economics, 24, 473–482.
47. O’Meara, K. (2007). Striving for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXII, pp. 121–179). Dordrecht: Springer.
48. Robst, J. (2001). Cost efficiency in public higher education institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(6), 730–750.
49. Deane, K. C. (Eds.). (2015). The university next door: What is a comprehensive university, who does it educate, and can it survive?. New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Selingo, J. (2015, February 5). Regional public colleges–the ‘middle children of higher ed’–struggle to survive. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2015/02/09/regional-public-colleges-the-middle-children-of-higher-ed-struggle-to-survive/.
51. Stevens, P. A. (2005). A stochastic frontier analysis of English and Welsh universities. Education Economics, 13(4), 355–374.
52. Stocum, D. L., & Rooney, P. M. (1997, September/October). Responding to resource constraints: A departmentally based system of responsibility center management. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning.
53. Strauss, J. C., & Curry, J. R. (2002). Responsibility center management: Lessons from twenty- five years of decentralized management. Washington, DC: NACUBO.
54. The College Board. (2014). Trends in college pricing. Retrieved from http://trends.collegeboard.org/college-pricing.
55. Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis: A foundation text with integrated software. New York: Springer.
56. Titus, M., & Eagan, K. (2016). Examining production efficiency in higher education: Theutility of stochastic frontier analysis. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31, pp. 441–512). Dordrecht: Springer.
57. U. S. Department of Education. (2015). Institution of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
58. Whalen, E. L. (1991). Responsibility center budgeting. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
59. Yin, M. L. (2015). Rethinking student outcomes: Constructing predicted and adjusted graduation and retention rates for comprehensive universities. In M. Schneider & K. C. Deane (Eds.), The university next door: What is a comprehensive university, who does it educate, and can it survive? (pp. 121–148). New York: Teachers College Press.
60. Zumeta, W. (2001). Public policy and accountability in higher education: Lessons from the past and present for the new millennium. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (pp. 155–197). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
61. Zumeta, W., Breneman, D. W., Callan, P. M., & Finney, J. E. (2012). Financing higher education in the era of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.