-
1
-
-
28044445101
-
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
-
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS. 2005;102:16569–72.
-
(2005)
PNAS
, vol.102
, pp. 16569-16572
-
-
Hirsch, J.E.1
-
3
-
-
33746454249
-
Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?
-
Batista PD. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics. 2006;68:179–89.
-
(2006)
Scientometrics
, vol.68
, pp. 179-189
-
-
Batista, P.D.1
-
4
-
-
33846235463
-
The rise and rise of citation analysis
-
Meho L. The rise and rise of citation analysis. Phys World. 2007;20:32–6.
-
(2007)
Phys World
, vol.20
, pp. 32-36
-
-
Meho, L.1
-
5
-
-
67649807817
-
The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations
-
Zhang CT. The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5429.
-
(2009)
PLoS One
, vol.4
, pp. 5429
-
-
Zhang, C.T.1
-
6
-
-
33748666845
-
Theory and practise of the g-index
-
Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics. 2006;69:131–52.
-
(2006)
Scientometrics
, vol.69
, pp. 131-152
-
-
Egghe, L.1
-
7
-
-
84882935822
-
The z-index: a geometric representation of productivity and impact which accounts for information in the entire rank-citation profile
-
Petersen AM, Succi S. The z-index: a geometric representation of productivity and impact which accounts for information in the entire rank-citation profile. J Inform. 2013;7:823–32.
-
(2013)
J Inform
, vol.7
, pp. 823-832
-
-
Petersen, A.M.1
Succi, S.2
-
9
-
-
77956459036
-
The h-index research output measurement: two approaches to enhance its accuracy
-
Bornmanna L, Mutza R, Daniel H-D. The h-index research output measurement: two approaches to enhance its accuracy. J Inform. 2010;4:407–14.
-
(2010)
J Inform
, vol.4
, pp. 407-414
-
-
Bornmanna, L.1
Mutza, R.2
Daniel, H.-D.3
-
10
-
-
84980371727
-
V-index: a fairer index to quantify an individual’s research output capacity
-
Vaidya JS. V-index: a fairer index to quantify an individual’s research output capacity. Br Med J. 2005;331:339c–1340c.
-
(2005)
Br Med J
, vol.331
, pp. 339c-1340c
-
-
Vaidya, J.S.1
-
11
-
-
0032527543
-
Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals
-
Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, Rennie D. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280:222–4.
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 222-224
-
-
Flanagin, A.1
Carey, L.A.2
Fontanarosa, P.B.3
Phillips, S.G.4
Pace, B.P.5
Lundberg, G.D.6
Rennie, D.7
-
12
-
-
33644871925
-
Schatten: Pitt panel finds “misbehavior” but not misconduct
-
Holden C. Schatten: Pitt panel finds “misbehavior” but not misconduct. Science. 2006;311:928.
-
(2006)
Science
, vol.311
, pp. 928
-
-
Holden, C.1
-
14
-
-
84864800341
-
An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing
-
Waltman L. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. J Inform. 2012;4:700–1.
-
(2012)
J Inform
, vol.4
, pp. 700-701
-
-
Waltman, L.1
|