Human vs. Automated text analysis: Estimating positive and negative affect

HT 2016 - Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 309-314

  Ziemer, Kathryn Schaefer ^a   Korkmaz, Gizem ^a  

^a VIRGINIA BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated text analysis; Expressive writing; Feature selection; Human coding; Lasso; LIWC; Sentiment analysis

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EXPRESSIVE WRITING; HUMAN CODING; LASSO; LIWC; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; TEXT ANALYSIS;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 84980337067     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2914586.2914634     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. I. Ajzen. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2):179-211, 1991.
2. I. Ajzen. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual review of psychology, 52(1):27-58, 2001.
3. G. W. Alpers, A. J. Winzelberg, C. Classen, H. Roberts, P. Dev, C. Koopman, and C. B. Taylor. Evaluation of computerized text analysis in an internet breast cancer support group. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2):361-376, 2005.
4. J. Alvarez-Conrad, L. A. Zoellner, and E. B. Foa. Linguistic predictors of trauma pathology and physical health. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(7):S159-S170, 2001.
5. K. Bakhtiyari, M. Taghavi, and H. Husain. Hybrid affective computing ATkeyboard, mouse and touch screen: from review to experiment. Neural Computing and Applications, 26(6):1277-1296, 2015.
6. E. O. Bantum and J. E. Owen. Evaluating the validity of computerized content analysis programs for identification of emotional expression in cancer narratives. Psychological assessment, 21(1):79, 2009.
7. C. M. Burton and L. A. King. The health benefits of writing about intensely positive experiences. Journal of research in personality, 38(2):150-163, 2004.
8. J. Cohen. A coeffcient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 1960.
9. J. R. Crawford and J. D. Henry. The positive and negative affect schedule (panas): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3):245-265, 2004.
10. M. C. Davis, A. J. Zautra, and J. W. Reich. Vulnerability to stress among women in chronic pain from fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis davis et al. stress vulnerability. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23(3):215-226, 2001.
11. R. Feldman. Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Communications of the ACM, 56(4):82-89, 2013.
12. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1975.
13. J. Frattaroli. Experimental disclosure and its moderators: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 132(6):823, 2006.
14. B. L. Fredrickson. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3):218, 2001.
15. J. H. Kahn, R. M. Tobin, A. E. Massey, and J. A. Anderson. Measuring emotional expression with the linguistic inquiry and word count. The American journal of psychology, pages 263-286, 2007.
16. K. Kercher. Assessing subjective well-being in the old-old the panas as a measure of orthogonal dimensions of positive and negative affect. Research on Aging, 14(2):131-168, 1992.
17. A. Mackinnon, A. F. Jorm, H. Christensen, A. E. Korten, P. A. Jacomb, and B. Rodgers. A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual difierences, 27(3):405-416, 1999.
18. S. Mishra, J. Diesner, J. Byrne, and E. Surbeck. Sentiment analysis with incremental human-in-the-loop learning and lexical resource customization. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media, pages 323-325. ACM, 2015.
19. A. Ortigosa, J. M. Martin, and R. M. Carro. Sentiment analysis in facebook and its application to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31:527-541, 2014.
20. J. W. Pennebaker and S. K. Beall. Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of abnormal psychology, 95(3):274, 1986.
21. J. W. Pennebaker, C. K. Chung, M. Ireland, A. Gonzales, and R. J. Booth. The development and psychometric properties of liwc2007. UT Faculty/Researcher Works, 2007.
22. J. W. Pennebaker, M. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth. Linguistic inquiry and word count: Liwc 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71:2001, 2001.
23. Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology, 29(1):24-54, 2010.
24. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12):2544-2558, 2010.
25. R. Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), pages 267-288, 1996.
26. W. Tov, K. L. Ng, H. Lin, and L. Qiu. Detecting well-being via computerized content analysis of brief diary entries. Psychological assessment, 25(4):1069, 2013.
27. D. Watson, L. A. Clark, and A. Tellegen. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6):1063, 1988.