Reports of the death of the microscope have been greatly exaggerated

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 140, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 744-745

  Granter, Scott R ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVICES; HUMAN; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRENDS;

HUMANS; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; PATHOLOGY, MOLECULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84980335276     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: 15432165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0046-ED     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Rosai J. Why microscopy will remain a cornerstone of surgical pathology. Lab Invest. 2007;87(5):403-408.
2. Handley T. Does the 21st century haematologist need a microscope? British Society for Haematology. http://www.b-s-h.org.uk/Students/195-Competitions.html. Accessed January 7, 2016.
3. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2011:245-254.
4. Mauboussin M. Think Twice: Harnessing the Power of Counterintuition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2009:1-16.
5. Lovallo D, Kahneman D. Delusions of success: how optimism undermines executives' decisions. Harv Bus Rev. 2003;81(7):56-63.
6. Sornette D, Zajdenweber D. Economic returns of research: the Pareto law and its implications. Eur Phys J B. 1999;8(4):653-664.
7. Taleb NN. Antifragile. New York, NY: Random House; 2012:316-320, 472, 473.
8. Caves CM. Predicting future duration from present age: a critical assessment. Contemp Phys. 2000;41(3):143-153.
9. Gott JR III. Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects. Nature. 1993;363:315-319.
10. Gott JR III. Future prospects discussed. Nature. 1994;368:108.