Less is more: Psychologists can learn more by studying fewer people

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue JUN, 2016, Pages

  Normand, Matthew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Idiographic research; Inferential statistics; Research methods; Single case designs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84980042013     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00934     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Barlow, D. H., and Nock, M. K. (2009). Why can't we be more idiographic in our research? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 19-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01088.x
2. Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., and Hersen, M. (2008). Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change, 3rd Edn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Bernard, C. (1865/1957). An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. New York, NY: Dover Press.
4. Best, L. A., Smith, L. D., and Stubbs, D. A. (2001). Graph use in psychology and other sciences. Behav. Processes 54, 155-165. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00156-5
5. Boring, E. G. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6. Branch, M. N. (2009). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: some things significance testing does and does not do. Behav. Anal. 22, 87-92.
7. Guala, F. (2003). Experimental localism and external validity. Philos. Sci. 70, 1195-1205. doi: 10.1086/377400
8. Hogarth, R. N. (2005). The challenge of representative design in psychology and economics. J. Econ. Methodol. 12, 253-263. doi: 10.1080/13501780500086172
9. Ioannidis, J. P., Munafo, M. R., Fusar-Poli, P., Nosek, B. A., and David, S. P. (2014). Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed). 18, 235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.010
10. Johnston, J. M., and Pennypacker, H. S. (2009). Strategies and Tactics of Behavioral Research, 3rd Edn. New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12. Michael, J. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: mixed blessing or curse? J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 7, 647-653. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-647
13. Morgan, D. L., and Morgan, R. K. (2001). Single-participant research design: bringing science to managed care. Am. Psychol. 56, 119-127. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.119
14. Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716
15. Parsonson, B. S., and Baer, D. M. (1978). "The analysis and presentation of graphic data". in Single-Subject Research: Strategies for Evaluating Change, ed T. R. Kratochwill (New York, NY: Academic Press), 105-165. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-425850-1.50009-0
16. Pashler, H., and Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors' introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: a crisis of confidence? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 528-530. doi: 10.1177/1745691612465253
17. Schlinger, H. D. (2004). Why psychology hasn't kept its promises. J. Mind Behav. 25, 123-144.
18. Sidman, M. (1952). A note on the functional relations obtained from group data. Psychol. Bull. 49, 263-269. doi: 10.1037/h0063643
19. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20. Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. Am. Psychol. 11, 221-233. doi: 10.1037/h0047662
21. Thorngate, W. (1986). "The production, detection, and explanation of behavioral patterns". in The Individual Subject and Scientific Psychology, ed J. Valsiner (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 71-93. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2239-7_4