Megafires: an emerging threat to old-forest species

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 300-306

  Jones, Gavin M ^a   Gutierrez R J ^b   Tempel, Douglas J ^a   Whitmore, Sheila A ^a   Berigan, William J ^a   Peery, M Zachariah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRY FOREST; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; FOREST FIRE; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; POPULATION DECLINE; PROBABILITY; RAPTOR;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

STRIGIFORMES; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS;

EID: 84980017380     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1298     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, and Kenward RE. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313–25.
2. Arnold TW. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike's information criterion. J Wildlife Manage 74: 1175–78.
3. Asner GP, Brodrick PG, Anderson CB, et al. 2015. Progressive forest canopy water loss during the 2012–2015 California drought. P Natl Acad Sci USA 113: E249–55.
4. Bond ML, Lee DE, Siegel RB, and Ward JP. 2009. Habitat use and selection by California spotted owls in a postfire landscape. J Wildlife Manage 73: 1116–24.
5. Calenge C. 2006. The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197: 516–19.
6. Clark DA, Anthony RG, and Andrews LS. 2013. Relationship between wildfire, salvage logging, and occupancy of nesting territories by northern spotted owls. J Wildlife Manage 77: 672–88.
7. Dawson T, Jackson S, and House J. 2011. Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332: 53–58.
8. DellaSala DA and Hanson CT. 2015. Ecological and biodiversity benefits of megafires. In: DellaSala DA and Hanson CT (Eds). The ecological importance of mixed-severity fires: nature's phoenix. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
9. Fontaine JB and Kennedy PL. 2012. Meta-analysis of avian and small-mammal response to fire severity and fire surrogate treatments in US fire-prone forests. Ecol Appl 22: 1547–61.
10. Hutto RL. 2008. The ecological importance of severe wildfires: some like it hot. Ecol Appl 18: 1827–34.
11. Lee DE and Bond ML. 2015. Occupancy of California spotted owl sites following a large fire in the Sierra Nevada, California. Condor 117: 228–36.
12. Lee DE, Bond ML, and Siegel RB. 2012. Dynamics of breeding-season site occupancy of the California spotted owl in burned forests. Condor 114: 792–802.
13. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Hines JE, et al. 2003. Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84: 2200–07.
14. Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, et al. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies (2nd edn). Dordrecht, the Netherlands, and Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Miller JD, Knapp EE, Key CH, et al. 2009a. Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Remote Sens Environ 113: 645–56.
16. Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, and Thode AE. 2009b. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12: 16–32.
17. North MP, Stephens SL, Collins BM, et al. 2015. Reform forest fire management: agency incentives undermine policy effectiveness. Science 349: 1280–81.
18. North MP, Stine P, O'Hara K, et al. 2009. An ecosystem management strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forests. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-220. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station.
19. Noss RF, Franklin JR, Baker WL, et al. 2006. Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Front Ecol Environ 4: 481–87.
20. Pilliod DS, Bull EL, Hayes JL, and Wales BC. 2006. Wildlife and invertebrate response to fuel reduction treatments in dry coniferous forests of the western United States: a synthesis. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-173. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
21. Popescu VD, de Valpine P, Tempel DJ, and Peery MZ. 2012. Estimating population impacts via dynamic occupancy analysis of Before-After Control–Impact studies. Ecol Appl 22: 1389–404.
22. Redpath SM, Young J, Evely A, et al. 2013. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 100–09.
23. Roberts SL, van Wagtendonk JW, Miles AK, and Kelt DA. 2011. Effects of fire on spotted owl site occupancy in a late-successional forest. Biol Conserv 144: 610–09.
24. Simberloff D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83: 247–57.
25. Stephens SL and Collins BM. 2004. Fire regimes of mixed-conifer forests in the north-central Sierra Nevada at multiple spatial scales. Northwest Sci 78: 12–23.
26. Stephens SL, Agee JK, Fulé PZ, et al. 2013. Managing forests and fire in changing climates. Science 342: 41–42.
27. Stephens SL, Bigelow SW, Burnett RD, et al. 2014a. California spotted owl, songbird, and small mammal responses to landscape fuel treatments. BioScience 64: 893–906.
28. Stephens SL, Burrows N, Buyantuyev A, et al. 2014b. Temperate and boreal forest mega-fires: characteristics and challenges. Front Ecol Environ 12: 115–22.
29. Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, et al. 2011. The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ 9: 117–25.
30. Sweitzer RA, Furnas BJ, Barrett RH, et al. 2015. Landscape fuel reduction, forest fire, and biophysical linkages to local habitat use and local persistence of fishers (Pekania pennanti) in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecol Manag 361: 208–25.
31. Tempel DJ and Gutiérrez RJ. 2013. Relation between occupancy and abundance for a territorial species, the California spotted owl. Conserv Biol 27: 1087–95.
32. Tempel DJ, Gutiérrez RJ, Battles JJ, et al. 2015. Evaluating short- and long-term impacts of fuels treatments and simulated wildfire on an old-forest species. Ecosphere 6: 261.
33. Tempel DJ, Gutiérrez RJ, Whitmore SA, et al. 2014a. Effects of forest management on California spotted owls: implications for reducing wildfire risk in fire-prone forests. Ecol Appl 24: 2089–106.
34. Tempel DJ, Peery MZ, and Gutiérrez RJ. 2014b. Using integrated population models to improve conservation monitoring: California spotted owls as a case study. Ecol Model 289: 86–95.
35. USFS (US Forest Service). 2015. Environmental Impact Statement, King Fire Restoration Project. R5-MB-292. Placerville, CA: Eldorado National Forest.
36. Westerling A, Hidalgo H, Cayan D, and Swetnam T. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313: 940–43.