Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: A cross-sectional study in primary care

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 66, Issue 649, 2016, Pages e577-e586

  Wood, Sally ^a   Greenfield, Sheila M ^b   Sayeed Haque, M ^b   Martin, Una ^b   Gill, Paramjit S ^b   Mant, Jonathan ^c   Mohammed, Mohammed A ^d   Heer, Gurdip ^b   Johal, Amanpreet ^b   Kaur, Ramandeep ^b   Schwartz, Claire ^a   McManus, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blood pressure monitoring; Ethnicity; Hypertension; Patient satisfaction; Primary care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN CARIBBEAN; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BRITISH ASIAN; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROGRAM ACCEPTABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOUTH ASIAN; BLOOD PRESSURE; ENGLAND; ETHNOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION;

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ENGLAND; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT CARE MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84979997859     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685717     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360(9349): 1903-1913.
2. Hodgkinson J, Mant J, Martin U, et al. Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review. BMJ 2011; 342: d3621.
3. Roguin A. Scipione Riva-Rocci and the men behind the mercury sphygmomanometer. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60(1): 73-79.
4. Krause T, Lovibond K, Caulfield M, et al. Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2011; 343: d4891.
5. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Blood Press 2013; 22(4): 193-278.
6. Daskalopoulou SS, Rabi DM, Zarnke KB, et al. The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2015; 31(5): 549-568.
7. Piper MA, Evans CV, Burda BU, et al. Diagnostic and predictive accuracy of blood pressure screening methods with consideration of rescreening intervals: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162(3): 192-204.
8. Gill PS, Kai J, Bhopal RS, et al. Black and minority ethnic groups. In: Stevens A, Raftery J, Mant J, Simpson S, eds. Health care needs assessment: the epidemiologically based needs assessment reviews. Oxford: Radcliffe, 2007: 227-399.
9. Wild S, McKeigue P. Cross sectional analysis of mortality by country of birth in England and Wales, 1970-92. BMJ 1997; 314: 705-710.
10. Mallion JM, de Gaudemaris R, Baguet JP, et al. Acceptability and tolerance of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the hypertensive patient. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1(3): 197-203.
11. Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, et al. Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care. BMJ 2002; 325(7358): 258-259.
12. Ernst ME, Bergus GR. Favorable patient acceptance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a primary care setting in the United States: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Fam Pract 2003; 4: 15.
13. Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Dafni MG, Stergiou GS. Patients' preference for ambulatory versus home blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens 2014; 28(4): 224-229.
14. Wood S, Martin U, Gill P, et al. Blood pressure in different ethnic groups (BP-Eth): a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2012; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001598.
15. Martin U, Haque MS, Wood S, et al. Ethnicity and differences between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Am J Hypertens 2014; DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpu211.
16. Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Gkinos CP, Patouras JD. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12(3): 185-188.
17. Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Overall accuracy of the BpTRU: an automated electronic blood pressure device. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9(1): 47-52.
18. Stergiou GS, Zourbaki AS, Skeva II, Mountokalakis TD. White coat effect detected using self-monitoring of blood pressure at home: comparison with ambulatory blood pressure. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11(7): 820-827.
19. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
20. Teddlie C, Yu, F. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J Mix Methods Res 2007; 1(1): 77-100.
21. UK Government. Indices of deprivation 2007. http://webarchive.nationalarchives. gov.uk/20100410180038/http://communities.gov.uk/communities/neighbourhoodrenewal/deprivation/deprivation07/(accessed 13 May 2016).
22. Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl 1965; 12(4): 436-445.
23. Denzin NK, ed. Sociological methods: a sourcebook. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction, 2006.
24. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for home blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens 2010; 24(12): 779-785.
25. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management. CG127. London: NICE, 2011, https://www.nice.org. uk/guidance/cg127 (accessed 13 May 2016).
26. Office for National Statistics. Focus on ethnicity and identity summary report, March 2005. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ethnicity/focus-on-ethnicity-and-identity/focus-on-ethnicity-and-identity-summary-report/index.html (accessed 13 May 2016).
27. Mead N, Roland M. Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices. BMJ 2009; 339: b3450.
28. Jones MI, Greenfield SM, Bray EP, et al. Patients' experiences of self-monitoring blood pressure and self-titration of medication: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2012; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X625201.
29. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Grubber JM, et al. Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151(10): 687-695.
30. Ward AM, Takahashi O, Stevens R, Heneghan C. Home measurement of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Hypertens 2012; 30(3): 449-456.
31. Shimamoto K, Ando K, Fujita T, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014). Hypertens Res 2014; 37(4): 253-390.
32. Komori T, Eguchi K, Hoshide S, et al. Comparison of wrist-type and arm-type 24-h blood pressure monitoring devices for ambulatory use. Blood Press Monit 2013; 18(1): 57-62.
33. [No authors listed]. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. JAMA 1967; 202(11): 1028-1034.