A new approach for predicting gas separation performances of MOF membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 519, Issue , 2016, Pages 45-54

  Gurdal, Yeliz ^a,b   Keskin, Seda ^a  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Gas separation; Membrane; Metal organic framework; Permeability; Selectivity

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CATALYST SELECTIVITY; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; FORECASTING; GAS PERMEABILITY; GASES; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANES; ORGANOMETALLICS; SEPARATION;

ACCURATE PREDICTION; APPROXIMATE METHODS; COMPUTATIONAL CALCULATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; GAS SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; GAS SEPARATIONS; METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK; TRANSPORT DIFFUSIVITY;

GAS PERMEABLE MEMBRANES;

ARGON; KRYPTON; METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK; XENON;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; GAS; GAS PERMEABILITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEMBRANE; PHASE SEPARATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; SIMULATION;

EID: 84979917835     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.039     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. [1] Moulton, B., Zaworotko, M.J., From molecules to crystal engineering: supramolecular isomerism and polymorphism in network solids. Chem. Rev. 101 (2001), 1629–1658.
2. [2] Coudert, F.X., Fuchs, A.H., Computational characterization and prediction of metal–organic framework properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 307 (2016), 211–236.
3. [3] Eddaoudi, M., Li, H., Yaghi, O.M., Highly porous and stable metal–organic frameworks: structure design and sorption properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000), 1391–1397.
4. [4] Getman, R.B., Bae, Y.S., Wilmer, C.E., Snurr, R.Q., Review and analysis of molecular simulations of methane, hydrogen, and acetylene storage in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112 (2012), 703–723.
5. [5] S. Keskin, Molecular Dynamics-Theoretical Developments and Applications in Nanotechnology and Energy, in: L. Wang (Ed.), InTech, 2012.
6. [6] Xiang, S., He, Y., Zhang, Z., Wu, H., Zhou, W., Krishna, R., Chen, B., Microporous metal-organic framework with potential for carbon dioxide capture at ambient conditions. Nat. Commun. 3 (2012), 954–962.
7. 2: a computer simulation investigation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 143 (2011), 46–53.
8. 168 schwarzite, and IRMOF-1: a comparative study from molecular dynamics simulation. Langmuir 24 (2008), 5474–5484.
9. 2 mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (2010), 2902–2906.
10. [10] Krishna, R., Methodologies for evaluation of metal-organic frameworks in separation applications. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 5 (2015), 52269–52295.
11. 2 adsorption in ZIF-8, Zeolite-13X and BPL activated carbon. Chem. Phys. 412 (2013), 72–76.
12. [12] Banerjee, D., Cairns, A.J., Liu, J., Motkuri, R.K., Nune, S.K., Fernandez, C.A., Krishna, R., Strachan, D.M., Thallapally, P.K., Potential of metal–organic frameworks for separation of xenon and krypton. Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (2015), 211–219.
13. [13] Parkes, M.V., Staiger, C.L., Perry, J.J. IV, Allendorf, M.D., Greathouse, J.A., Screening metal-organic frameworks for selective noble gas adsorption in air: effect of pore size and framework topology. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 (2013), 9093–9106.
14. 4 and n-alkanes in faujasite. Sep. Purif. Technol. 20 (2000), 1–13.
15. 4 mixtures in faujasite from molecular simulations. AIChE J. 47 (2001), 2032–2041.
16. [16] Hwang, S.T., Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of membrane transport. AlChE J. 50 (2004), 862–870.
17. [17] Onsager, L., Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I. Phys. Rev. 37 (1931), 405–426.
18. [18] Onsager, L., Reciprocal Relations in irreversible processes. II. Phys. Rev. 38 (1931), 2265–2279.
19. [19] Keskin, S., Accelerating development of metal organic framework membranes using atomically detailed simulations. Zydney, Andrew, (eds.) Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2009, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
20. 2 capture. J. Membr. Sci. 360 (2010), 323–333.
21. 4 mixtures. Chem. Eng. J. 133 (2007), 121–131.
22. [22] Fischer, M., Hoffmann, F., Froba, M., Metal-organic frameworks and related materials for hydrogen purification: interplay of pore size and pore wall polarity. R. Soc. Chem Adv. 2 (2012), 4382–4396.
23. 2 separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54 (2015), 1103–1112.
24. [24] Keskin, S., Sholl, D.S., Efficient methods for screening of metal organic framework membranes for gas separations using atomically detailed models. Langmuir 25 (2009), 11786–11795.
25. [25] Gurdal, Y., Keskin, S., Predicting noble gas separation performance of metal organic frameworks using theoretical correlations. J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013), 5229–5241.
26. [26] Gurdal, Y., Keskin, S., Atomically detailed modeling of metal organic frameworks for adsorption, diffusion, and separation of noble gas mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012), 7373–7382.
27. [27] Frenkel, D., Smit, B., Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications. 2002, Academic Press, San Diego.
28. [28] Ford, D.C., Dubbeldam, D., Snurr, R.Q., Künzel, V., Wehring, M., Stallmach, F., Kärger, J., Müller, U., Self-diffusion of chain molecules in the metal–organic framework IRMOF-1: simulation and experiment. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3 (2012), 930–933.
29. [29] Snurr, R.Q., Karger, J., Molecular simulations and nmr measurements of binary diffusion in zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997), 6469–6473.
30. [30] Kerry, F.G., Industrial Gas Handbook: Gas Separation and Purification, 2007, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
31. [31] Mayo, S.L., Olafson, B.D., Goddard, W.A., DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990), 8897–8909.
32. [32] Rappe, A.K., Casewit, C.J., Colwell, K.S., Goddard, W.A., Skiff, W.M., UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992), 10024–10035.
33. [33] Ryan, P., Farha, O.K., Broadbelt, L.J., Snurr, R.Q., Computational screening of metal-organic frameworks for xenon/krypton separation. AIChE J. 57 (2011), 1759–1766.
34. [34] Maitland, G.C., Rigby, M., Smith, E.B., Intermolecular Forces: Their Origin and Determination, 1981, Clarendon, Oxford.
35. [35] Allen, M.P., Tildesley, D.J., Computer Simulation of Liquids, 1987, Oxford University Press, New York.
36. 4 mixture permeation through silicalite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 227 (2003), 123–136.
37. [37] Keil-Frerich, J., Krishna, R., Coppens, M.O., Modeling of diffusion in zeolites. Rev. Chem. Eng. 16 (2000), 71–197.
38. [38] Skoulidas, A.I., Sholl, D.S., Self-diffusion and transport diffusion of light gases in metal-organic framework materials assessed using molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005), 15760–15768.
39. [39] Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., Lightfoot, E.N., Transport Phenomena, 2007, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
40. [40] Chempath, S., Krishna, R., Snurr, R.Q., Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of diffusion of binary mixtures containing short n-alkanes in faujasite. J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004), 13481–13491.
41. [41] Krishna, R., van Baten, J.M., Onsager coefficients for binary mixture diffusion in nanopores. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63 (2008), 3120–3140.
42. [42] Krishna, R., Paschek, D., Self-diffusivities in multicomponent mixtures in zeolites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4 (2002), 1891–1898.