Global days of action, global public transcripts and democracy: A reply

Global Discourse

Volumn 4, Issue 2-3, 2014, Pages 367-369

  Chou, Mark ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979872730     PISSN: 23269995     EISSN: 20437897     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23269995.2014.914368     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Dean, J. 2011. “Claiming Division, Naming a Wrong.” In Occupy! Scenes from Occupied America, edited by A. Taylor, K. Gessen, and editors from n+1, Dissent, Triple Canopy and The New Inquiry. London: Verso Books.
2. Razsa, M., and A. Kurnik. 2012. “The Occupy Movement in Žižek’s Hometown: Direct Democracy and a Politics of Becoming.” American Ethnologist 39 (2): 238–258. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01361.x.
3. Roberts, A. 2012a. “Why the Occupy Movement Failed.” Public Administration Review 72 (5): 754–762. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02614.x.
4. Roberts, A. 2012b. “Why Occupy Failed.” Prospect, June 21.
5. Smith, J., and B. Glidden. 2012. “Occupy Pittsburgh and the Challenges of Participatory Democracy.” Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest 11 (3–4): 288–294. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.704182.