Partnering in research: A national research trial exemplifying effective collaboration with American Indian Nations and the Indian Health Service

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 180, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1202-1207

  Chadwick, Jennifer Q ^a,b   Copeland, Kenneth C ^a,b   Daniel, Mary R ^a,b   Erb Alvarez, Julie A ^c   Felton, Beverly A ^d   Khan, Sohail I ^e   Saunkeah, Bobby R ^f   Wharton, David F ^g   Payan, Marisa L ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE   (United States)

^d Absentee Shawnee Tribe Shawnee Clinic   (United States)

^e Cherokee Nation Health Services   (United States)

^f Section of Research and Population Health   (United States)

^g Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Health Services Authority   (United States)

^h GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

American Indian health; American Indians; Collaborative research; Community based research

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; AUTONOMY; DIABETES; ETHNIC GROUP; HEALTH SERVICES; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH WORK;

AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INDIAN; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OKLAHOMA; UNITED NATIONS; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COOPERATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; UNITED STATES;

CHEROKEE COUNTY [OKLAHOMA]; CHICKASHA; CHOCTAW COUNTY [OKLAHOMA]; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; OKLAHOMA; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE;

EID: 84979864749     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu246     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Division of Program Statistics, Indian Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services. Trends in Indian Health 2002-2003. Rockville, MD: Indian Health Service; 2004. http://www.ihs.gov/dps/files/Trends%20Cover %20Page%20&%20Front%20Text.pdf. Published January 25, 2010. Updated February 12, 2010. Accessed June 6, 2014.
2. Davis SM, Reid R. Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69(4 suppl):755S-759S.
3. Wax ML. The ethics of research in American Indian communities. Am Indian Q. 1991;15(4):431-456.
4. Rubin P. Indian givers: the Havasupai trusted the white man to help with a diabetes epidemic [online]. Phoenix New Times. May 27, 2004. http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2004-05-27/news/indian-givers/full/. Accessed November 7, 2012.
5. Valenti JM. Reporting hantavirus: a study of intercultural environmental journalism. Presented at the Conference on Communication and Environment, Chattanooga, Tennessee, March 31-April 2, 1995.
6. Brugge D, Missaghian M. Protecting the Navajo People through tribal regulation of research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006;12(3):491-507.
7. Foulks EF. Misalliances in the Barrow Alcohol Study. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 1989;2(3):7-17.
8. Schell LM, Tarbell AM. A partnership study of PCBs and the health of Mohawk youth: lessons from our past and guidelines for our future. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(suppl 3): 833-840.
9. Jacobson SF, Booton-Hiser D, Moore JH, et al. Diabetes research in an American Indian community. Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(2):161-165.
10. Stoddart ML, Jarvis B, Blake B, et al. Recruitment of American Indians in epidemiologic research: the Strong Heart Study. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2000;9(3):20-37.
11. Lee ET, Begum M, Wang W, et al. Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in American Indians aged 5-40: the Cherokee Diabetes Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(9): 696-704.
12. Bureau of Indian Affairs, US Department of the Interior. Indian entities recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. Fed Regist. 2014; 79(19):4748-4753.
13. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 US 1, 16-17 (1831).
14. Indian Self-Determination Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203, 25 USC 450-458bbb-2 (1975).
15. Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act Amendments of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-472, 25 USC 450-450n (1988).
16. American Indian Law Center, Inc. Model Tribal Research Code: With Materials for Tribal Regulation for Research and Checklist for Indian Health Boards. 3rd ed. Albuquerque, NM: American Indian Law Center, Inc.; 1999:2-3.
17. Manson SM, Garroutte E, Goins RT, et al. Access, relevance, and control in the research process: lessons from Indian country. J Aging Health. 2004;16(5 suppl):58S-77S.
18. Struthers R, Lauderdale J, Nichols LA, et al. Respecting tribal traditions in research and publications: voices of five Native American nurse scholars. J Transcult Nurs. 2005;16(3): 193-201.
19. Christopher S, Watts V, McCormick AK, et al. Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1398-1406.
20. Acton KJ, Burrows NR, Moore K, et al. Trends in diabetes prevalence among American Indian and Alaska Native children, adolescents, and young adults. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(9):1485-1490.
21. Copeland KC, Zeitler P, Geffner M, et al. Characteristics of adolescents and youth with recent-onset type 2 diabetes: the TODAY cohort at baseline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96(1):159-167.
22. Cochran PA,Marshall CA, Garcia-Downing C, et al. Indigenous ways of knowing: implications for participatory research and community. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(1):22-27.
23. Mohammed SA, Walters KL, LaMarr J, et al. Finding middle ground: negotiating university and tribal community interests in community-based participatory research. Nurs Inq. 2012;19(2): 116-127.