The dream of a global knowledge network - A new approach

Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Doerr, Martin ^a   Iorizzo, Dolores ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cultural heritage; Global information access; Information integration; Interdisciplinary research; Knowledge networks; Ontology engineering; Research requirements

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; RESEARCH;

CULTURAL HERITAGES; GLOBAL INFORMATIONS; INFORMATION INTEGRATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 84979833333     PISSN: 15564673     EISSN: 15564711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1367080.1367085     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ABERER, K., CATARCI, T., CUDRE-MARUROUX, P., DILLON, T. S., GRIMM, S., HACID, M.-S., ILLARRAMENDI, A., JARRAR, M., KASHYAP, V., MECELLA, M., MENA, E., NEUHOLD, E. J., OUKSEL, A. M., RISSE, T., SCANNAPIECO, M., SALTOR, F., SANTIS, L., SPACCAPIETRA, S., STAAB, S., STUDER, R., AND TROYER, O. 2004. Emergent semantics systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantics of a Networked World (ICSNW'04). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3226, 14-43.
2. BAYARDO, R. J., BOHRER, W., BNEE, R., ET AL. 1997. InfoSleuth: Agent-based semantic integration of information in open and dynamic environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. vol. 26, 2, 195-206.
3. BERNERS-LEE, T. AND FISCHETTI, M. 1999. Weaving The Web: The Original Design And Ultimate Destiny Of The World Wide Web by its Inventor. Harper Collins, New York, NY.
4. BERNERS-LEE, T., HANDLER, J., AND LASSILA, O. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American. May.
5. BILENKO, M. AND MOONEY, R. J. 2003. Adaptive duplicate detection using learnable string similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'03). Washington DC, 39-48.
6. BRODER, A., KUMAR, R., MAGHOUL, F., RAGHAVAN, P., RAJAGOPALAN, S., STATA, R., TOMKINS, A., AND WIENER, J. 2000. Graph structure in the Web. Comput. Netw.: Int. J. Comput. Telecomm. Netw. 33, 1-6, 309-320.
7. CALI, A. 2003. Reasoning in data integration systems: Why LAV and GAV are siblings. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mothodologies for Intelligent System (ISMIS'03). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2871, 562-571.
8. CALVANESE, D., GIACOMO, G., LENZERINI, M., NARDI, D., AND ROSATI, R. 1998. Description logic framework for information integration. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'98). 2-13.
9. CARDOSO, J. AND SHETH, A. Eds. 2006. Semantic Web Services, Processes and Applications. Springer.
10. CIDOC, CRM. 2006. The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/.
11. CROFTS, N. 1999. Implementing the CIDOC CRM with a relational database. MCN Spectra. 24, 1.
12. CROFTS, N., DOERR, M., GILL, T., STEAD, S., AND STIFF M. 2005. Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model. http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/cidoc crm version 4.2.doc.
13. CYCORP, INC. 2006. What does Cyc know? http://www.cyc.com/cyc/technology/ whatiscyc dir/whatdoescycknow.
14. DIONISSIADOU, I. AND DOERR, M. 1994. Mapping of material culture to a semantic network, In Proceedings of the 1994 Joint Annual Meeting of the International Council of Museums Documentation Committee and Computer Network. Washington DC.
15. DEGEN, W., HELLER, B., HERRE, H., AND SMITH, B. 2001. GOL-Towards an Axiomatized Upper-Level Ontology. Electron. Comput. Sci.
16. DEWEY, M. 2003. Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index. 2Ed. 22. Vol. 1-4, OCLC Forest Press.
17. DODDS, L. 2004. An Introduction to FOAF. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/ 02/04/foaf.html.
18. DOERR, M. 2003. The CIDOC CRM-An ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine 24, 3.
19. DOERR, M., HUNTER, J., AND LAGOZE, C. 2003. Towards a core ontology for information integration. J. Digital Inform. 4, Article 169.
20. DOERR, M., PLEXOUSAKIS, D., KOPAKA, K., AND BEKIARI, C. 2004. Supporting chronological reasoning in archaeology. In Proceedings of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference (CAA'04). Prato, Italy, http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/publications/paperlink/caa2004 supporting chronological reasoning.pdf.
21. DOERR, M., SCHALLER, K., AND THEODORIDOU, M. 2004. Integration of complementary archaeological sources. In Proceedings of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference (CAA'04). Prato, Italy. http://www.ics. forth.gr/isl/publications/paperlink/doerr3 caa2004.pdf.
22. DOERR, M. AND LEBOEUF, P. 2006. Modelling intellectual processes: The FRBR-CRM harmonization. In Conference Proceedings of ICOM-CIDOC Annual Meeting. Gothenburg, Sweden. 10-14.
23. DOERR, M. AND KRITSOTAKI, A. 2006. Documenting events in metadata. In The e-volution of Information Communication Technology in Cultural Heritage, 56-61.
24. DCMI. 2006. Dublin Core metadata initiative, Making it easier to find information. http://dublincore.org/.
25. DWORMAN, G. O., KIMBOROUGH, S. O., AND PATCH, C. 2000. Pattern-directed search of archives and collections, J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 51, 1, (Special issue. When museum informatics meets the World Wide Web), 14-23.
26. FAUCONNIER, G. AND TURNER, M. 2002. The Way we Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Complexities. Basic Books, New York, NY.
27. P. LEBOEUF Ed. 2005. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Hype or Cure-All?. Haworth Press, Inc.
28. GARDIN, J.-CL. 1990. The structure of archaeological theories. In Studies in Modern Archaeology, vol. 3, 7-25.
29. GENEREUX, M. AND NICCOLUCCI, F. 2006. Extraction and mapping of CIDOC-CRM encodings from texts and other digital formats. In The e-volution of Information Communication Technology in Cultural Heritage, 56-61.
30. GRUBER, T. R. 1993. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Inter. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 43, 907-928.
31. GUARINO, N. 1998. Formal ontology and information systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference. Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Trento, Italy. IOS Press, 3-15
32. GUARINO, N. AND WELTY, C. 2001. Identity and subsumption. LADSEB-CNR Internal Report 01/2001.
33. HALSALL, P. 1997. Modern history sourcebook: The Yalta conference, http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1945YALTA.html.
34. KIM, S., LEWIS, P., AND MARTINEZ, K. 2004. SCULPTEUR D7.1, Semantic Network of Concepts and their Relationships. http://www.sculpteurweb.org/html/ events/D7.1 Public.zip.
35. LAGOZE, C., KRAFFT, D. B., PAYETTE, S., AND JESUROGAI, S. 2005. What Is a digital library anymore, anyway? D-Lib Magazine 11, 11.
36. LAKOFF, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
37. LEVESQUE, H. J. 1984. Foundations of a functional approach to knowledge representation. AI 23, 2, 155-212.
38. LEVY, A. Y., RAJARAMAN, A., AND ORDILLE, J. 1996. Querying heterogeneous information sources using source descriptions. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Very Large Databases. Bombay, India, 251-262.
39. LU, J. J., NERODE, A., AND SUBRAHMANIAN, V. S. 1996. Hybrid knowledge bases. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, Volume 8, Issue 5, 773-785, ISSN:1041-434.
40. MAGKANARAKI, A., ALEXAKI, S., CHRISTOPHIDES, V., AND PLEXOUSAKIS, D. 2002. Benchmarking RDF schemata for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'02). Sardinia, Italy, Vol. 2342/2002, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
41. MASOLO, C., BORGO, S., GANGEMI, A., GUARINO, N., AND OLTRAMARI, A. 2001. The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology. http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/documents/D18.pdf.
42. NUSSBAUMER, P. AND HASLHOFER, B. 2007. CIDOC CRM in action-Experiences and challenges. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 532-533.
43. PATEL, M., KOCH, T., DOERR, M., TSINARAKI, C., GIOLDASIS, N., GOLUB, K., AND TUDHOPE, D. 2005. Semantic Interoperability in Digital Library Systems, DELOS Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries.
44. PODNAR, I., LUU, T., RAJMAN, M., KLEMM, F., ABERER, K. 2006. A peer-to-peer architecture for information retrieval across digital library collections. In Proceedings of 10th European Conference (ECDL'06). Alicante, Spain, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 14-25.
45. RdfSemantics. 2004. W3C Recommendation 2004, version http://www.w3.org/ TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/.
46. P. HAYES, Ed. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.
47. REED, P.-A. 1995. CIDOC relational data model, A guide. http://www.willpowerinfo.myby.co.uk/cidoc/model/relational. model/datamodel.pdf.
48. ROUX, V. AND BLASCO P. 2004. Logicisme et format SCD: d'une épistémologie pratique à de nouvelles pratiques édito-riales Herme's. CNRS-éditions.
49. RODRIGUEZ, M. A., STEINBOCK, D. J., WATKINS, J. H., GERSHENSON, C., BOLLEN, J., GREY, V., AND DEGRAF, B. 2007. Smartocracy: Social networks for collective decision making. In Proceedings of IEEE Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS'07), 90.
50. RYAN, W. AND PITMAN, W. 1998. Noah's Flood: The New Scientific Discoveries About the Event That Changed History. Sinon & Schuster.
51. SCHORLEMMER, M. AND KALFOGLOU, Y. 2005. Progressive ontology alignment for meaning coordination: an information-theoretic foundation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS'05). Utrecht, Holland.
52. SINCLAIR, P., ADDIS, M., CHOI, F., DOERR, M., LEWIS, P., AND MARTINEZ, K. 2006. The use of CRM Core in multimedia annotation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Web Annotations for Multimedia (SWAMM'06). Edinburgh, Scotland.
53. SMITH, B. 2003. Ontology. In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, L. Floridi, Ed. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 155-166.
54. SOWA, J. F. 1992. Semantic networks. In Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, 2nd Ed. S. C. Shapiro, Ed. John Wiley, NewYork, NY, 1493-1511.
55. STOREY, V. C. 2005. Comparing relationships inconceptual modelling: Mappingtosemantic classifications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Engin. 17, 11.
56. STREITZ, N. A., HAAKE, J. M., HANNEMANN, J., LEMKE, A. C, SCHULER, W., SCHUTT, H. A., AND THURING, M. 1992. SEPIA: A cooperative hypermedia authoring environment. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (ECHT'92), D. Lucarella, J. Nanard, M. Nanard, and P. Paolini, Eds., ACM Press, 11-22.
57. TOULMIN, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
58. ® KNOWLEDGE SOURCES. 2000. February Release 2006AA Documentation. US, National Library of medicine, National Institutes of Health. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/archive/2006AA/umlsdoc.html.
59. VINCENT, K. P. 2005. Text mining methods for event recognition in stories. Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, Tech. Rep. kmi-05-02, http://kmi.open. ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-05-2.pdf
60. WEIBEL, S., IANNELLA, R., AND CATHRO, W. 1997. The 4th Dublin Core metadata workshop report. D-Lib Magazine.
61. WIEDERHOLD, G. 1992. Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Computer.
62. WIGGINS, D. 2001. Identity and Substance Renewed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
63. WITTGENSTEIN, L. 1984. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Tagebücher 1915-1916. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany.
64. WORDNET. 2006. WordNet a lexical database for the English language. http://w ordnet.princeton.edu/.