Computational historiography: Data mining in a century of classics journals

Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Mimno, David ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979819322     PISSN: 15564673     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2160165.2160168     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. BLEI, D., NG, A., AND JORDAN, M. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993-1022.
2. BLEI, D. M. AND LAFFERTY, J. D. 2007. A correlated topic model of science. Ann. Appl. Statist. 1, 1, 17-35.
3. BLOCK, S. ANDNEWMAN,D. 2011. What, where, when and sometimes why: Data mining twenty years of women's history abstracts. J. Women's History.
4. BORNER, K., CHEN, C., AND BOYACK, K. W. 2003. Visualizing knowledge domains. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 179-255. (Pubitemid 36121885)
5. DEERWESTER, S., DUMAIS, S. T., FURNAS, G. W., LANDAUER, T. K., AND HARSHMAN, R. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 41, 6, 391-407.
6. GARFIELD, E., PUDOVKIN, A., AND ISTOMIN, V. 2003. Why do we need algorithmic historiography? J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54, 5, 400-412.
7. HALL, D., JURAFSKY, D., AND MANNING, C. D. 2008. Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP'08). 363-371.
8. HOFMANN, T. 1999. Probilistic latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'99).
9. Journal of Roman Studies. 1985. Editor's note. J. Roman Stud. 75, ix.
10. KLAVANS, R. AND BOYACK, K. W. 2006. Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57, 2, 251-263.
11. KLAVANS, R. AND BOYACK, K. W. 2009. Toward a consensus map of science. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60, 3, 455-476.
12. MIMNO, D.,WALLACH, H., NARADOWSKY, J., SMITH, D. A., AND MCCALLUM, A. 2009. Polylingual topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP'09).
13. MORETTI, F. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. Verso.
14. NEWMAN, D. AND BLOCK, S. 2006. Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth century newspaper. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57, 6, 753-767.
15. PONTE, J. M. AND CROFT, W. B. 1998. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.
16. SMALL, H. 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 50, 9, 799-813.
17. SMITH, R. R. R. 1990. Late roman philosopher portraits from aphrodisias. The J. Roman Stud. 80, 127-155.
18. YAO, L.,MIMNO, D., AND MCCALLUM, A. 2009. Efficient methods for topic model inference on streaming document collections. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'09).
19. ZHAI, C. AND LAFFERTY, J. 2001. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.