Naturalism and ACI: Augmenting zoo enclosures with digital technology

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 16-19-November-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Carter, Marcus ^a   Webber, Sarah ^a   Sherwen, Sally ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b Wildlife and Conservation and Science   (Australia)

Author keywords

Animal computer interaction; Naturalism; Zoo exhibits

Indexed keywords

ENCLOSURES;

ANIMAL-COMPUTER INTERACTIONS; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; NATURALISM; WELLBEING; ZOO EXHIBITS;

ANIMALS;

EID: 84979737396     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2832932.2837011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. James P. Bacon and Mark Hallett. 1981. Exhibit systems for reptiles and amphibians at the San Diego Zoo: dioramas and graphics. International Zoo Yearbook 21, 1: 14-21. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.1981.tb01936.x
2. Roy Ballantyne, Jan Packer, Karen Hughes, and Lynn Dierking. 2007. Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research 13, 3: 367-383. http://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430604
3. Andrea W. Clay, Bonnie M. Perdue, Diann E. Gaalema, Francine L. Dolins, and Mollie A. Bloomsmith. 2011. The use of technology to enhance zoological parks. Zoo Biology 30, 5: 487-497. http://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20353
4. Jon C. Coe. 1985. Design and perception: Making the zoo experience real. Zoo Biology 4, 2: 197-208. http://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430040211
5. Jon C. Coe. 1997. Entertaining Zoo Visitors and Zoo Animals: An Integrated Approach. AZA Convention Proceedings, American Zoo and Aquarium Association, 156-162.
6. Eduardo J. Fernandez, Michael A. Tamborski, Sarah R. Pickens, and William Timberlake. 2009. Animal-visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120, 1-2: 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.06.002
7. David Fraser. 2009. Assessing animal welfare: different philosophies, different scientific approaches. Zoo Biology 28, 6: 507-518. http://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20253
8. Fiona French, Clara Mancini, and Helen Sharp. 2015. Designing Interactive Toys for Elephants. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15). ACM, 523-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810327
9. Priscilla F. Jimenez Pazmino, Brenda Lopez Silva, Brian Slattery, and Leilah Lyons. 2013. Teachable Mo[Bil]Ment: Capitalizing on Teachable Moments with Mobile Technology in Zoos. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 643-648. http://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468470
10. Debra Kutska. 2009. Variation in visitor perceptions of a polar bear enclosure based on the presence of natural vs. un-natural enrichment items. Zoo Biology 28, 4: 292-306. http://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20226
11. Jerry F. Luebke and Jennifer Matiasek. 2013. An exploratory study of zoo visitors' exhibit experiences and reactions. Zoo Biology 32, 4: 407-416. http://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21071
12. Clara Mancini. 2011. Animal-computer Interaction: A Manifesto. Interactions 18, 4: 69-73. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978822.1978836
13. Bonnie M Perdue, Andrea W Clay, Diann E Gaalema, Terry L Maple, and Tara S Stoinski. 2012. Technology at the zoo: the influence of a touchscreen computer on orangutans and zoo visitors. Zoo Biology 31, 1: 27-39. http://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20378
14. Bonnie M. Perdue, Tara S. Stoinski, and Terry L. Maple. 2012. Using Technology to Educate Zoo Visitors About Conservation. Visitor Studies 15, 1: 16-27. http://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2012.660839
15. Joyce Shettel-Neuber. 1988. Second- and Third-Generation Zoo Exhibits - A Comparison of Visitor, Staff, and Animal Responses. Environment and Behavior 20, 4: 452-473. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013916588204005
16. Jake S. Veasey, Natalie K. Waran, and Robert J. Young. 1996. On Comparing the Behaviour of Zoo Housed Animals with Wild Conspecifics as a Welfare Indicator, Using the Giraffe (Glraffa Camelopardalis) as a Model. Animal Welfare 5, 2: 139-153.
17. Hanna Wirman. 2013. Orangutan play on and beyond a touchscreen. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Electronic Art, ISEA.
18. Hanna Wirman. 2014. Games for / with strangers - Captive orangutan (pongo pygmaeus) touch screen play. Antennae: The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture, 30: 104-112. Retrieved from http://www.antennae.org.uk/30-home-continued/4587670814
19. World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2005. Building a Future for Wildlife: The World Zoo and Aquarium Conservation Strategy. Retrieved July 1, 2015 from http://www.waza.org/files/webcontent/1.public-site/5.conservation/conservation-strategies/building-a-future-for-wildlife/wzacs-en.pdf