Validity and reliability of dermoscopic criteria used to differentiate nevi from melanoma aweb-based international dermoscopy society study

JAMA Dermatology

Volumn 152, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 798-806

  Carrera, Cristina ^a,b   Marchetti, Michael A ^a   Dusza, Stephen W ^a   Argenziano, Giuseppe ^c   Braun, Ralph P ^d   Halpern, Allan C ^a   Jaimes, Natalia ^e   Kittler, Harald J ^f   Malvehy, Josep ^b   Menzies, Scott W ^g,h   Pellacani, Giovanni ⁱ   Puig, Susana ^b   Rabinovitz, Harold S ^j   Scope, Alon ^k   Peter Soyer, H ^l,m   Stolz, Wilhelm ⁿ   Hofmann Wellenhof, Rainer ^o   Zalaudek, Iris ^o   Marghoob, Ashfaq A ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSIDAD PONTIFICIA BOLIVARIANA   (Colombia)

^f Universitatsklinik fur Dermatologie   (Austria)

^g ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^j Skin Cancer and Associates   (United States)

^k TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^l UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^m TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

ⁿ Clinic for Dermatology   (Germany)

^o MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3 POINT CHECKLIST; 7 POINT CHECKLIST; ABCD RULE; ARTICLE; CHAOS AND CLUES; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; COLOR ARCHITECTURE SYMMETRY AND HOMOGENEITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MELANOMA; MENZIES METHOD; NEVUS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDITY; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INTERNET; RANDOMIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKIN TUMOR; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; DERMOSCOPY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; MELANOMA; NEVUS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SKIN NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84979701672     PISSN: 21686068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0624     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3(3):159-165.
2. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Sammarco E, Delfino M. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions: comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134 (12):1563-1570.
3. Stolz W, Riemann A, Cognetta AB, et al. ABCD rule of dermoscopy: A new practical method for early recognition of malignant melanoma. Eur J Dermatol. 1994;4(7):521-527.
4. Soyer HP, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: A new screening method for early detection of melanoma. Dermatology. 2004;208(1):27-31.
5. Henning JS, Dusza SW, Wang SQ, et al. The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy. J AmAcad Dermatol. 2007;56(1):45-52.
6. Menzies SW, Ingvar C, Crotty KA, McCarthy WH. Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(10): 1178-1182.
7. Rosendahl C, Cameron A, McColl I, Wilkinson D. Dermatoscopy in routine practice: chaos and clues. Aust FamPhysician. 2012;41(7):482-487.
8. Dolianitis C, Kelly J, Wolfe R, Simpson P. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(8): 1008-1014.
9. Pizzichetta MA, Talamini R, Marghoob AA, et al. Negative pigment network: An additional dermoscopic feature for the diagnosis of melanoma. J AmAcad Dermatol. 2013;68(4):552-559.
10. Balagula Y, Braun RP, Rabinovitz HS, et al. The significance of crystalline/chrysalis structures in the diagnosis of melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions. J AmAcadDermatol. 2012;67(2):194.e1-194.e8.
11. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J AmAcad Dermatol. 2003;48(5):679-693.
12. Carli P, Quercioli E, Sestini S, et al. Pattern analysis, not simplified algorithms, is the most reliablemethod for teaching dermoscopy for melanoma diagnosis to residents in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(5):981-984.
13. Rosendahl C, Tschandl P, Cameron A, Kittler H. Diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic pigmented lesions. J AmAcad Dermatol. 2011;64(6):1068-1073.
14. Argenziano G, Puig S, Zalaudek I, et al. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(12):1877-1882.
15. Menzies SW, Emery J, Staples M, et al. Impact of dermoscopy and short-Term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging for the management of pigmented lesions in primary care: A sequential intervention trial. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(6):1270-1277.
16. International Society for Digital Imaging of the Skin. http://isdis.net/isic-project/. Accessed October 7, 2015.
17. International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC). Melanoma Project. ISIC Archive. https://isic-Archive.com/. Accessed October 7, 2015.
18. Kurvers RH, Krause J, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Wolf M. Detection accuracy of collective intelligence assessments for skin cancer diagnosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(12):1346-1353.
19. Katalinic A, Waldmann A, Weinstock MA, et al. Does skin cancer screening save lives? an observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening. Cancer. 2012;118(21):5395-5402.