Damage control strategy for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis

Techniques in Coloproctology

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 577-583

  Sohn, M ^a   Agha, A ^a   Heitland, W ^b   Gundling, F ^a   Steiner, P ^c   Iesalnieks, I ^a  

^a Chirurgische Klinik Munchen Bogenhausen   (Germany)

^b Ctr for Minimally Invasive Surgery   (Germany)

^c Städtisches Klinikum München Harlaching ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Damage control surgery; Perforated diverticular disease; Peritonitis

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; COLON PERFORATION; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAMAGE CONTROL SURGERY; DIVERTICULITIS; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; HARTMANN PROCEDURE; HUMAN; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; PERITONITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPTIC SHOCK; SEX DIFFERENCE; STOMA; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; VACUUM ASSISTED CLOSURE; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANASTOMOSIS; COLOSTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; DESCENDING COLON; DIVERTICULITIS, COLONIC; ILEOSTOMY; INTESTINAL PERFORATION; MIDDLE AGED; RECTUM; SECOND LOOK SURGERY; SIGMOID; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; COLECTOMY; COLON, DESCENDING; COLON, SIGMOID; COLOSTOMY; DIVERTICULITIS, COLONIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; INTESTINAL PERFORATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; PERITONITIS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SECOND-LOOK SURGERY;

EID: 84979692013     PISSN: 11236337     EISSN: 1128045X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1506-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Holmer C, Kreis ME (2014) Diverticular disease—choice of surgical procedure. Chirurg 85:308–313
2. Aydin HN, Remzi FH, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2005) Hartmann’s reversal is associated with high postoperative adverse events. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2117–2126
3. Vermeulen J, Coene PPLO, Van Hout NM et al (2009) Restoration of bowel continuity after surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis: should Hartmann’s procedure be considered a one-stage procedure? Colorectal Dis 11:619–624
4. Oberkofler CE, Rickenbacher A, Raptis DA et al (2012) A multicenter randomized clinical trial of primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis. Ann Surg 256:819–826 (discussion 826–827)
5. Vermeulen J, Lange JF (2010) Treatment of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: past, present, and future. World J Surg 34:587–593
6. Kafka-Ritsch R, Birkfellner F, Perathoner A et al (2012) Damage control surgery with abdominal vacuum and delayed bowel reconstruction in patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III/IV. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1915–1922
7. Perathoner A, Klaus A, Mühlmann G, Oberwalder M, Margreiter R, Kafka-Ritsch R (2010) Damage control with abdominal vacuum therapy (VAC) to manage perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis—a proof of concept. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:767–774
8. Cirocchi R, Arezzo A, Vettoretto N et al (2014) Role of damage control surgery in the treatment of Hinchey III and IV sigmoid diverticulitis: a tailored strategy. Medicine 93:e184
9. Langenfeld SJ (2013) Mandatory exploration is not necessary for patients with acute diverticulitis and free intraperitoneal air. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:1376
10. Rogy M, Függer R, Schemper M, Koss G, Schulz F (1990) The value of 2 distinct prognosis scores in patients with peritonitis. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index versus the Apache II score. Chirurg 61:297–300
11. Függer R, Rogy M, Herbst F, Schemper M, Schulz F (1988) Validation study of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Chirurg 59:598–601
12. Demmel N, Muth G, Maag K, Osterholzer G (1994) Prognostic scores in peritonitis: the Mannheim Peritonitis Index or APACHE II? Langenbecks Arch Chir 379:347–352
13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
14. Binda GA, Karas JR, Serventi A, Study Group on Diverticulitis et al (2012) Primary anastomosis vs nonrestorative resection for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis: a prematurely terminated randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 14:1403–1410
15. Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Desiderio J et al (2013) Treatment of Hinchey stage III-IV diverticulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:447–457
16. O’Sullivan GC, Murphy D, O’Brien MG, Ireland A (1996) Laparoscopic management of generalized peritonitis due to perforated colonic diverticula. Am J Surg 171:432–434
17. Myers E, Hurley M, O’Sullivan GC, Kavanagh D, Wilson I, Winter DC (2008) Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 95:97–101
18. Toorenvliet BR, Swank H, Schoones JW, Hamming JF, Bemelman WA (2010) Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 12:862–867
19. Angenete E, Thornell A, Burcharth J et al (2014) Laparoscopic lavage is feasible and safe for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: the first results from the randomized controlled trial DILALA. Ann Surg 263:117–122
20. Swank HA, Vermeulen J, Lange JF, Dutch Diverticular Disease (3D) Collaborative Study Group et al (2010) The ladies trial: laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or resection for purulent peritonitis and Hartmann’s procedure or resection with primary anastomosis for purulent or faecal peritonitis in perforated diverticulitis (NTR2037). BMC Surg 10:29
21. Vennix S, Musters GD, Mulder IM, Ladies trial colloborators et al (2015) Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 386:1269–1277
22. Schultz JK, Yaqub S, Wallon C, SCANDIV Study Group et al (2015) Laparoscopic lavage vs primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis: the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1364–1375