End-to-end vs. Hop-by-hop transport under intermittent connectivity (invited paper)

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Communication Systems, Autonomics 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Heimlicher, Simon ^a   Karaliopoulos, Merkouris ^a   Levy, Hanoch ^a,b   May, Martin ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

BUILDING BLOCKES; DELIVERY RATIO; END-TO-END CONNECTIVITY; END-TO-END TRANSPORT; INTERMITTENT CONNECTIVITY; PARAMETER RANGE; TRANSPORT CONTROL; WIRELESS SCENARIOS;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

EID: 84979648964     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.4108/ICST.AUTONOMICS2007.2225     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, S. Biswas, G. Judd, and R. Morris. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. In ACM SIGCOMM’04, New York, NY, USA, Aug. 2004.
2. A. DeSimone, M. C. Chuah, and O.-C. Yue. Throughput performance of transport-layer protocols over wireless LANs. In IEEE GLOBECOM’93, Houston, TX, USA, Nov. 1993.
3. H. Elaarag. Improving TCP Performance over Mobile Networks. ACM Computer Surveys, 34(3), 2002.
4. S. Floyd, T. Henderson, and A. Gurtov. The NewReno Modification to TCP’s Fast Recovery Algorithm. RFC 3782 (Proposed Standard), Apr. 2004.
5. I.I. Gichman and A.V. Skorokhod. The Theory of Stochastic Processes II. Springer, May 2004
6. I. Gitman. Comparison of Hop-by-hop and End-to-end Acknowledgment Schemes in Computer Communication Networks. IEEE Trans. on Comm., 24(11), 1976.
7. S. Heimlicher, P. Nuggehalli, and M. May. End-to-end vs. Hop-by-hop Transport. In ACM SIGMETRICS’07 Student Workshop, San Diego, CA, June 2007. To app.
8. S. Heimlicher, R. Baumann, M. May, and B. Plattner. The Transport Layer Revisited. In IEEE COMSWARE’07, Bangalore, India, Jan. 2007.
9. IEEE. Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications. In IEEE Std 802.11-1999, 1999.
10. T. Issariyakul and E. Hossain. Analysis of end-to-end performance in a multi-hop wireless network for different hop-level ARQ policies. In IEEE GLOBECOM’04, volume 5, Nov. 2004.
11. V. Jacobson and M. Karels. Congestion Avoidance and Control. In ACM SIGCOMM’88, Aug. 1988.
12. D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In Mobile Computing, volume 353. Kluwer, 1996.
13. P. Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L.-S. Peh, and D. Rubenstein. Energy-Efficient Computing for Wildlife Tracking: Design Tradeoffs and Early Experiences with ZebraNet. In ASPLOS-X, San Jose, CA, USA, Oct. 2002.
14. J. C. Kuo and W. Liao. Hop count distribution of multihop paths in wireless networks with arbitrary node density: Modeling and its applications. IEEE Trans. on Vehic. Techn., 56, July 2007.
15. V. Lenders, J. Wagner, and M. May. Analyzing the Impact of Mobility in Ad Hoc Networks. In ACM REALMAN, Florence, Italy, May 2006.
16. P. P. Mishra, H. Kanakia, and S. K. Tripathi. On hop-by-hop rate-based congestion control. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Netw., 4(2), Apr. 1996.
17. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. RFC 3561 (Experimental), July 2003.
18. C. E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In ACM SIGCOMM’94, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
19. C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In IEEE WMCSA’99. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
20. J. Postel. Internet Protocol. RFC 791 (Standard), Sept. 1981.
21. J. Postel. Transmission Control Protocol. RFC 793 (Standard), Sept. 1981.