Implementer-initiated adaptation of evidence-based interventions: Kids remember the blue wig

Health Education Research

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 405-415

  Gibbs, D A ^a   Krieger, K E ^a   Cutbush, S L ^a   Clinton Sherrod, A M ^a   Miller, S ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGY;

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84979609971     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyw017     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Blakely CH, Mayer JP, Gottschalk RG et al. The fidelityadaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs. Am J Commun Psychol 1987; 15: 253-68
2. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Commun Psychol 2008; 41: 327-50
3. 1vretveit J, Leviton L, Parry G. Increasing the generalisability of improvement research with an improvement replication programme. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20: i87-i91
4. Stirman SW, Miller CJ, ToderKet al.Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci 2013; 8: 65
5. Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ.Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument. J School Psychol 2006; 44: 427-45
6. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Hansen WB et al. Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 308-13
7. Hansen WB, Pankratz MM, Dusenbury L et al. Styles of adaptation: The impact of frequency and valence of adaptation on preventing substance use. Health Educ Res 2013; 113: 345-63
8. Bauman L, Stein RK, Ireys H. Reinventing fidelity: The transfer of social technology among settings. Am J Commun Psychol 1991; 19: 619-39
9. Elliott DS, Mihalic S. Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prev Sci 2004; 5: 47-53
10. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, FalcoMet al.Areview of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 237-56
11. Ennett ST, Haws S, Ringwalt CL et al. Evidence-based practice in school substance use prevention: fidelity of implementation under real-world conditions. Health Educ Res 2011; 26: 361-71
12. Miller-Day M, Pettigrew J, Hecht ML et al. How prevention curricula are taught under real-world conditions: Types of and reasons for teacher curriculum adaptations. Health Educ Res 2013; 113: 324-44
13. Mowbray CT, Holter MC, Gregory BT et al. Fidelity criteria: development, measurement, and validation. Am J Eval 2003; 24: 315-40
14. Bishop DC, Pankratz MM, Hansen WB et al. Measuring fidelity and adaptation: reliability of a instrument for school-based prevention programs. Eval Health Prof 2014; 37: 231-57
15. Moore J, Bumbarger B, Cooper B. Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. J Prim Prev 2013; 34: 147-61
16. Castro FG, Barrera M Jr., Martinez CR Jr. The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prev Sci 2004; 5: 41-5
17. Lattimore D, Griffin SF, Wilcox S et al. Understanding the challenges encountered and adaptations made by community organizations in translation of evidence-based behavior change physical activity interventions: A qualitative study Am J Health Promot 2010; 24: 427-34
18. Aarons GA, Miller EA, Green AE et al. Adaptation happens: A qualitative case study of implementation of the incredible years evidence-based parent training programme in a residential substance abuse treatment programme. J Child Serv 2012; 7: 233-45
19. Hill L, Maucione K, Hood BK. A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prev Sci 2007; 8: 25-34
20. Start Strong: Building Healthy Teen Relationships Available at: http://startstrong.futureswithoutviolence.org/Accessed: 10 November 2014
21. Miller S, Williams J, Cutbush S et al. Evaluation of the start strong initiative: preventing teen dating violence and promoting healthy relationships among middle school students J Adolesc Health 2015; 56:S14-S9
22. Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation. Safe Dates n.d. Available at: http://www.hazelden.org/web/public/safedates.page Accessed: 10 November 2014
23. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Arriaga XB et al. An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 45-50
24. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Greene WF et al. The Safe Dates program: 1-year follow-up results. Am J Public Health 2000; 90: 1619
25. Gaiser TJ. Online focus groups. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G (eds). The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Los Angeles: Sage; 2008, 290-306
26. Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983
27. Backer T. Finding the Balance: Program Fidelity and Adaptation in Substance Abuse Prevention: A State-of-The-Art Review. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. 2001
28. Lee S, Altschul I, Mowbray C. Using planned adaptation to implement evidence-based programs with new populations Am J Commun Psychol 2008; 41: 290-303
29. McKleroy VS, Galbraith JS, Cummings B et al Adapting evidence-based behavioral interventions for new settings and target populations. AIDS Educ Prev 2006; 18: 59-73
30. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. The ADAPT-ITT model. A novel method of adapting evidence-basedHIV Interventions JAIDS 2008; 47: S40. S6
31. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA et al. Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, Florida, University of South Florida: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005
32. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation Am J Commun Psychol 2008; 41: 171-81
33. Century J, Rudnick M, Freeman C. A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. Am J Eval 2010; 31: 199-218
34. Rohrbach L, Dent C, Skara S et al. Fidelity of implementation in project towards no drug abuse (TND): A comparison of classroom teachers and program specialists. Prev Sci 2007; 8: 125-32
35. Morrison DM, Hoppe MJ, Gillmore MR et al. Replicating an intervention: The tension between fidelity and adaptation AIDS Educ Prev 2009; 21: 128
36. Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidencebased practice, wheres the practice-based evidence? Family Practice 2008; 25: i20-i4
37. McDonald PW, Viehbeck S. From evidence-based practice making to practice-based evidence making: creating communities of (research) and practice. Health Promot Practice 2007; 8: 140-4