Test-retest reliability of visual-evoked potential habituation

Cephalalgia

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 831-839

  Rauschel, Veronika ^a   Ruscheweyh, Ruth ^a   Krafczyk, Siegbert ^a   Straube, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

cortical excitability; habituation; Migraine; test retest reliability; visual evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE EXCITABILITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; VISUAL THRESHOLD; MIGRAINE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84979573633     PISSN: 03331024     EISSN: 14682982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0333102415613613     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Rasmussen BK,. Epidemiology and socio-economic impact of headache. Cephalalgia 1999; 19 (Suppl 25): 20-23.
2. Levav I, Rutz W,. The WHO World Health Report 2001 new understanding-new hope. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 2002; 39: 50-56.
3. Harriott AM, Schwedt TJ,. Migraine is associated with altered processing of sensory stimuli. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014; 18: 458-458.
4. Kropp P, Gerber WD,. Prediction of migraine attacks using a slow cortical potential, the contingent negative variation. Neurosci Lett 1998; 257: 73-76.
5. Wang W, Schoenen J,. Interictal potentiation of passive "oddball" auditory event-related potentials in migraine. Cephalalgia 1998; 18: 261-265. discussion 241.
6. Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J,. Habituation and migraine. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009; 92: 249-259.
7. Cucchiara B, Datta R, Aguirre GK, et al. Measurement of visual sensitivity in migraine: Validation of two scales and correlation with visual cortex activation. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 585-592.
8. Afra J, Cecchini AP, De Pasqua V, et al. Visual evoked potentials during long periods of pattern-reversal stimulation in migraine. Brain 1998; 121: 233-241.
9. Afra J, Ambrosini A, Genicot R, et al. Influence of colors on habituation of visual evoked potentials in patients with migraine with aura and in healthy volunteers. Headache 2000; 40: 36-40.
10. Coppola G, Cremers J, Gerard P, et al. Effects of light deprivation on visual evoked potentials in migraine without aura. BMC Neurol 2011; 11: 91-91.
11. Coppola G, Parisi V, Di Lorenzo C, et al. Lateral inhibition in visual cortex of migraine patients between attacks. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 20-20.
12. Bednar M, Kubova Z, Kremlacek J,. Lack of visual evoked potentials amplitude decrement during prolonged reversal and motion stimulation in migraineurs. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 1223-1230.
13. 2 laser-evoked potential study. Headache 2012; 52: 792-807.
14. Di Clemente L, Puledda F, Biasiotta A, et al. Topiramate modulates habituation in migraine: Evidences from nociceptive responses elicited by laser evoked potentials. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 25-25.
15. Andrasik F,. Biofeedback in headache: An overview of approaches and evidence. Cleve Clin J Med 2010; 77 (Suppl 3): S72-S76.
16. Nestoriuc Y, Martin A, Rief W, et al. Biofeedback treatment for headache disorders: A comprehensive efficacy review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2008; 33: 125-140.
17. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 629-808.
18. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner K, et al. Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 107-114. discussion 74.
19. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Whyte J, et al. An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology 1999; 53: 988-994.
20. Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, Palmer JE, et al. Suppression of perception in migraine: Evidence for reduced inhibition in the visual cortex. Neurology 2001; 56: 178-183.
21. Rauschel V, Ruscheweyh R, Eggert T, et al. Magnetic suppression of perceptual accuracy is not reduced in episodic migraine without aura. J Headache Pain 2014; 15: 83-83.
22. Maizey L, Allen CP, Dervinis M, et al. Comparative incidence rates of mild adverse effects to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124: 536-544.
23. Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C, et al. Visual evoked potentials standard (2004). Doc Ophthalmol 2004; 108: 115-123.
24. Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, et al. Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 2003; 106: 105-115.
25. American Electroencephalographic Society. Guideline thirteen: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. American Electroencephalographic Society. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 11: 111-113.
26. Schellberg D, Gasser T, Köhler W,. The intra-individual reproducibility of flash-evoked potentials in a sample of children. Int J Psychophysiol 1987; 5: 135-143.
27. Sarnthein J, Andersson M, Zimmermann MB, et al. High test-retest reliability of checkerboard reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) over 8 months. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 1835-1840.
28. Hacke W,. Visual evoked potentials from the viewpoint of test theory [article in German]. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb 1985; 16: 158-161.
29. Judit A, Sandor PS, Schoenen J,. Habituation of visual and intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials tends to normalize just before and during the migraine attack. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 714-719.
30. Siniatchkin M, Averkina N, Andrasik F, et al. Neurophysiological reactivity before a migraine attack. Neurosci Lett 2006; 400: 121-124.
31. Kropp P, Kiewitt A, Göbel H, et al. Reliability and stability of contingent negative variation. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2000; 25: 33-41.
32. Rankin CH, Abrams T, Barry RJ, et al. Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009; 92: 135-138.
33. Bohotin V, Fumal A, Vandenheede M, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in migraine. Brain 2002; 125: 912-922.
34. Diener HC, Scholz E, Dichgans J, et al. Central effects of drugs used in migraine prophylaxis evaluated by visual evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 1989; 25: 125-130.
35. Ozkul Y, Bozlar S,. Effects of fluoxetine on habituation of pattern reversal visually evoked potentials in migraine prophylaxis. Headache 2002; 42: 582-587.
36. Viganò A, D'Elia TS, Sava SL, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the visual cortex: A proof-of-concept study based on interictal electrophysiological abnormalities in migraine. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 23-23.
37. Haan J, Hollander J, Ferrari MD,. Migraine in the elderly: A review. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 97-106.