A Context Model for Architectural Decision Support

Proceedings - 2016 1st International Workshop on Decision Making in Software ARCHitecture, MARCH 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 9-15

  Carlson, Jan ^a   Papatheocharous, Efi ^a,c   Petersen, Kai ^b  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Sweden)

^c BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Architectural decision support; Context modelling

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

ARCHITECTURAL DECISION; ARCHITECTURAL DECISION MAKINGS; CONTEXT INFORMATION; CONTEXT MODELLING; CONTEXT REPRESENTATION; DECISION MAKING SUPPORT; DECISION SITUATION; DEVELOPMENT METHOD;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84979516903     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/MARCH.2016.6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. P. Brezillon, "Modeling and using context: Past, present and future, " Laboratoire dInformatique de Paris 6, France, Tech. Rep. LIP6 2002/010, 2002.
2. K. Petersen and C. Wohlin, "Context in industrial software engineering research, " in Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM, 2009, pp. 401-404.
3. C. Wohlin, D. Smite, U. Franke, K. Wnuk, D. Badampudi, and A. Cicchetti, "Decision-making for selecting software assets-origin of our software components and services?" 2016, under submission.
4. E. Papatheocharous, K. Petersen, A. Cicchetti, S. Sentilles, S. M. A. Shah, and T. Gorschek, "Decision support for choosing architectural assets in the development of software-intensive systems: The GRADE taxonomy, " in Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops, 2015, pp. 48:1-48:7.
5. S. Ghaisas, P. Rose, M. Daneva, K. Sikkel, and R. J. Wieringa, "Generalizing by similarity: Lessons learnt from industrial case studies, " in 1st International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry, CESI 2013. IEEE Computer Society, May 2013, pp. 37-42.
6. T. Dyba, D. I. K. Sj?erg, and D. S. Cruzes, "What works for whom, where, when, and why?: on the role of context in empirical software engineering, " in 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 12, Lund, Sweden-September 19-20, 2012, 2012, pp. 19-28.
7. P. Clarke and R. V. OConnor, "The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework, " Information and Software Technology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 433-447, 2012.
8. B. Cartaxo, A. Almeida, E. Barreiros, J. Saraiva, W. Ferreira, and S. Soares, "Mechanisms to characterize context of empirical studies in software engineering, " in Experimental Software Engineering Latin American Workshop (ESELAW 2015), 2015, pp. 1-14.
9. S. Betz and C. Wohlin, "Alignment of business, architecture, process, and organisation in a software development context, " in 2012 ACMIEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 12, Lund, Sweden-September 19-20, 2012, 2012, pp. 239-242.
10. M. E. Conway, "How do committees invent, " Datamation, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 28-31, 1968.
11. S. Betz, D. Mite, S. Fricker, A. Moss, W. Afzal, M. Svahnberg, C. Wohlin, J. Borstler, and T. Gorschek, "An evolutionary perspective on socio-Technical congruence: The rubber band effect, " in Replication in Empirical Software Engineering Research (RESER), 2013 3rd International Workshop on. IEEE, 2013, pp. 15-24.
12. S. Mujtaba, R. Feldt, and K. Petersen, "Analyzing strategy and processes for product customization in large-scale industrial settings, " in 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2011, Oulu, Finland, August 30-September 2, 2011, 2011, pp. 369-373.
13. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2003.
14. I. Ozkaya, P. Kruchten, R. L. Nord, and N. Brown, "Managing technical debt in software development: report on the 2nd international workshop on managing technical debt, held at icse 2011, " ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 33-35, 2011.
15. R. L. Nord and J. E. Tomayko, "Software architecture-centric methods and agile development, " IEEE Software, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 47-53, 2006.
16. M. A. Babar, "An exploratory study of architectural practices and challenges in using agile software development approaches, " in Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture 2009 and European Conference on Software Architecture 2009, WICSA/ECSA 2009, Cambridge, UK, 14-17 September 2009, 2009, pp. 81-90.
17. D. Bruneo, T. Fritz, S. Keidar-Barner, P. Leitner, F. Longo, C. Marquezan, A. Metzger, K. Pohl, A. Puliafito, D. Raz et al., "Cloudwave: Where adaptive cloud management meets devops, " in Computers and Communication (ISCC), 2014 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1-6.
18. D. Tofan, M. Galster, and P. Avgeriou, "Difficulty of architectural decisions-A survey with professional architects, " in Software Architecture. Springer, 2013, pp. 192-199.
19. P. Berander and P. Jnsson, "Hierarchical cumulative voting (HCV)-prioritization of requirements in hierarchies, " International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 819-850, 2006.