Foraging under competition: evolutionarily stable patch-leaving strategies with random arrival times. 1.Scramble competition

Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games

Volumn 9, Issue , 2007, Pages 327-348

  Hamelin, Frédéric ^a   Bernhard, Pierre ^a   Nain, Philippe ^b   Wajnberg, Éric ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Handling time; Intake rate; Interarrival time; Patch quality; Scramble competition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979459143     PISSN: 24740179     EISSN: 24740187     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4553-3_16     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Bernstein C., Kacelnik A., Krebs J.R.: Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment II: the influence of travel costs and structure of the environment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 60:205-225, 1991.
2. Brown J.S.: Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22:37-47, 1988.
3. Brown J.S., Rosenzweig M.L.: Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 123:151-171, 1986.
4. Charnov E.L.: Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9:129-136, 1976.
5. Clark C.W., Mangel M.: The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theoretical Population Biology. 30:45-75, 1986.
6. Clark C.W., Mangel M.: Dynamic state variable models in Ecology, methods and applications. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 2000.
7. Corless R.M., Gonnet G.H., Hare D.E.G., Jeffrey D.J., Knuth D.E.: On the Lambert W function. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 5:329-359, 1996.
8. Giraldeau, L.-A., Beauchamp, G.: Food exploitation: searching for the optimal joining policy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14:102-106, 1999.
9. Hamelin F., Bernhard P., Shaiju A.J., Wajnberg E.: Foraging under competition: evolutionarily stable patch-leaving strategies with random arrival times. 2. Interference competition. Annals of Dynamic Games, this volume, Birkhauser, pp. 349-366, 2007.
10. Holling C.S.: Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. The Canadian Entomologist, 91:385-398, 1959.
11. Houston A.I., McNamara J.M.: Models of adaptive behavior: an approach based on state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999.
12. Kacelnik A., Krebs J.R., Bernstein C.: The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7:50-55, 1992.
13. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B., editors: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 1997.
14. Maynard Smith J.: Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982.
15. McNamara J.M., Houston A.I., Collins E.J.: Optimality models in Behavioral Biology. SIAM Review. 43: 413-466, 2001.
16. Parker G.A., Stuart R.A.: Animal behaviour as a strategy optimizer: evolution of resource assessment strategies and optimal emigration thresholds. The American Naturalist, 110:1055-1076, 1976.
17. Ruxton G.D., Fraser C., and Broom M.: An evolutionarily stable joining policy for group foragers. Behavioral Ecology, 16:856-864, 2005.
18. Sjerps M., Haccou P.: Effects of competition on optimal patch leaving: a war of attrition. Theoretical Population Biology, 3:300-318, 1994.
19. Spiegel M.R.: Shaum’s outline of theory and problems of Laplace transforms, Shaum’s Outline Series, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA, 1965.
20. Stephens D.W., Krebs J.R.: Foraging theory. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 1986.
21. Sutherland W.J.: From individual behavior to population ecology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1996.
22. Trezenga T.: Building on the ideal free distribution. Advances in Ecological Research, 26:253-302, 1995.