Access and Retrieval of Recent Journal Articles: A Comparative Study of Chemists and Geoscientists

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Volumn 2004, Issue 40, 2004, Pages

  Hallmark, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979178071     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10921206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.29173/istl1987     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. American Chemical Society. 2003. ACS Journal Editors' Policy on Preprints. [Online]. Available http://pubs.acs.org/cen/preprint.html [October 10, 2003].
2. Davis, Philip M. 2002. Patterns in electronic journal usage: challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries 63(6):484-97.
3. Davis, Philip M. 2003. An IP-Level analysis of Usage Statistics for Electronic Journals in Chemistry: Making Inferences About User Behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(11):1062-8.
4. Flaxbart, David. 2001 (published 2003). Conversations with Chemists: Information Seeking Behavior of Chemistry Faculty in the Electronic Age. Science and Technology Libraries 21(3/4):5-26.
5. Frazier, Kenneth. 2001. "The Librarians' Dilemma: Contemplating the Costs of the "Big Deal," D-Lib Magazine 7(3) (March 2001) [Online]. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html [October 5, 2003].
6. Joseph, Lura. 2002. Information Seeking and Communication Behavior of Petroleum Geologists. Science and Technology Libraries 21(3/4):46-62.
7. Hallmark, Julie. 1994, Scientists' access and retrieval of references cited in their recent journal articles, College and Research Libraries 55(3): 199-209.
8. Hallmark, Julie. 1998, Geoscientists' Access and Retrieval of Journal Articles in an Electronic World. In Charlotte Derksen and Connie Manson, editors, Accreting the Continent's Collections: Geoscience Information Society Proceedings 29, p. 67-74.
9. Holoviak, Judy; Seitter, Keith L. 1997, Transcending the limitations of the printed page. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 3(1). [Online]. Available: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/ [March 25, 2004].
10. Morton, Carol Cruzan. 1997, Online access is profoundly changing scientific publishing, The Scientist, v. 11 (no. 7), p. 13-14. http://www.the-scientist.com/ [August 3, 2004].
11. Resh, Vincent H. 1998. Science and communication: an author/editor/user's perspective on the transition from paper to electronic publishing. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 23. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/98-summer/article3.html [March 25, 2004].
12. Sathe, Nila A., Grady, Jenifer L., and Giuse, Nunzia B. 2002. Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. Journal of the Medical Library Association 90(2):235-43.