A framework for self-experimentation in personalized health

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 440-448

  Karkar, Ravi ^a   Zia, Jasmine ^b   Vilardaga, Roger ^a   Mishra, Sonali R ^a   Fogarty, James ^a   Munson, Sean A ^a   Kientz, Julie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

human centered design; Individualized medicine; Irritable bowel syndrome; Self experimentation; Technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; IRRITABLE COLON; METHODOLOGY; MOBILE APPLICATION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; RESEARCH; SELF-EXPERIMENTATION; WELLBEING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

AUTOEXPERIMENTATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME; MALE; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; PRECISION MEDICINE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84979073193     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv150     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Jorgensen JT. New era of personalized medicine: a 10-year anniversary. Oncologist. 2009;14(5):557-558.
2. Swan M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6:492-525.
3. Lillie EO1, Patay B, Diamant J, Issell B, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Per Med. 2011;8(2):161-173.
4. Riley WT, Glasgow RE, Etheredge L, et al. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clin Transl Med. 2013;2(1):10.
5. Choe EK, Lee NB, Lee B, et al. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. Proc. the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM 2014;1143-1152.
6. Dunne E. The unrealized potential of mHealth. J Mobile Technol Med News.2014 http://www.journalmtm.com/2014/the-unrealized-potential-ofmhealth/. Accessed May 1, 2015.
7. Meldrum ML. A brief history of the randomized controlled trial: from Oranges and Lemons to the gold standard. Hematol/Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14 :745-760.
8. Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LP. Measurement, Design, and Analysis. An Integrated Approach. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1991.
9. Rizvi SL, Nock MK. Single-case experimental designs for the evaluation of treatments for self-injurious and suicidal behaviors. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2008;38(5):498-510.
10. Neuringer A. Self-experimentation: a call for change. Behaviorism. 1981;9(1):79-94.
11. Dallery J, Cassidy RN, Raiff BR. Single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technology-based health interventions. J Med Int Res. 2013;15(2):e22
12. Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock JH, Horner RH, et al. Single-case intervention research design standards. Rem Spec Educ. 2013;34:26-38.
13. Parker RI, Vannest KJ, Davis JL. Effect size in single-case research: a reviewof nine nonoverlap techniques. Behav Modif. 2011;35:303-322.
14. Shadish WR, Hedges LV, Pustejovsky JE. An SPSS Macro for a d-Statistic for Single-Case Designs. Workshop presented at the 2013 Spring Conference of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. Washington, D.C., USA. 2013.
15. Maggin DM, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ, et al. A generalized least squares regression approach for computing effect sizes in singlecase research Application examples. J School Psychol. 2011;49:301-321.
16. Moeyaert M, Ugille M, Ferron J, Beretvas S, Van Den Noortgate W. Threelevel analysis of single-case experimental data: empirical validation. J Exp Educ. 2013;82:1-21.
17. Kahng S, Chung K, Gutshall K, et al. Consistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010;43(1):35-45.
18. Hayes SC. Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. J Consult Clin Psych. 1981;49(2):193-211.
19. Edgington ES, Onghena P. Randomization Tests. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall; 2007.
20. Heyvaert M, Onghena P. Randomization tests for single-case experiments: state of the art, state of the science, and state of the application. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014;3(1):51-64.
21. Fisher RA. The Design of Experiments. Oxford, England: Oliver & Boyd; 1935.
22. Vilardaga R, Bricker JB, McDonell MG. The promise of mobile technologies and single case designs for the study of individuals in their natural environment. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014;3(2):148-153.
23. Onghena P, Edgington ES. Customization of pain treatments: single-case design and analysis. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(1):56-68.
24. Hintze JL, Nelson RD. Violin plots: a box plot-density trace synergism. Am Stat. 1998;52(2):181-184.
25. Jamieson AE, Fletcher PC, Schneider MA. Seeking control through the determination of diet: a qualitative investigation of women with irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Nurse Specialist. 2007;21(3):152-160.
26. Eswaran S, Tack J, Chey WD. Food: the forgotten factor in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2011;40(1):141-162.
27. Canavan C, West J, Card, T. The epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:71-80.
28. Elsenbruch S. Abdominal pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a review of putative psychological, neural and neuroimmune mechanisms. Brain, Behav Immun. 2011;25(3):386-394.
29. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Effect of gender on prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in the community: systemic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:991-1000.
30. Mitra D, Davis KL, Baran RW. All-cause healthcare charges among managed care patients with constipation and comorbid irritable bowel syndrome. Postgrad Med. 2011;123(3):122-132.
31. Ladabaum U, Boyd E, Zhao WK, et al. Diagnosis, comorbidities, and management of irritable bowel syndrome in patients in a large health maintenance organization. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2012;10(1):37-45.
32. Staudacher HM, Whelan K, Irving PM, et al. Comparison of symptom response following advice for a diet low in fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs) versus standard dietary advice in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. J Hum Nutr Dietetics. 2011;24(5):487-495.
33. Biesiekierski JR, Newnham ED, Irving PM, et al. Gluten causes gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects without celiac disease: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastro. 2011;106(3):508-514.
34. Halmos EP, Power VA, Shepherd SJ, et al. A diet low in FODMAPs reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(1): 67-75.
35. Biesiekierski JR, Peters SL, Newnham ED, et al. No effects of gluten in patients with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity after dietary reduction of fermentable, poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(2):320-328.
36. Barney P, Weisman P, Jarrett M, et al. Master Your IBS: An 8-Week Plan Proven to Control the Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Bethesda: American Gastroenterological Association; 2010.
37. Catsos P. IBS Free at Last! Second Edition: Change Your Carbs, Change Your Life with the Fodmap Elimination Diet. Portland: Pond Cove Press; 2012.
38. Shepherd S, Gibson P. The Complete Low-FODMAP Diet: A Revolutionary Plan for Managing IBS and Other Digestive Disorders. New York City: The Experiment; 2013.
39. Jhaveri M, Lee E. Performance of electronic diaries in diabetes clinical trials measured through overall satisfaction of site coordinators. J Diabetes Sci Tech. 2007;1(4):522-530.
40. Heinonen R, Luoto R, Lindfors P, et al. Usability and feasibility of mobile phone diaries in an experimental physical exercise study. Telemed e-Health. 2012;18(2):115-119.
41. Cordeiro F, Epstein DA, Thomaz E, Bales E, Jagannathan AK, Abowd GD, Fogarty J. Barriers and Negative Nudges: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2015, pp. 1159-1162.
42. Kueper T, Martinelli D, Konetzki W, et al. Identification of problem foods using food and symptom diaries. Surgery. 1995;112:415-420.
43. Maguire M. Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2001;55(4):587-634.
44. Truong KN, Hayes GR, Abowd GD. Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, ACM. 2006, pp. 12-21.
45. Haesen M, Meskens J, Luyten K, Coninx K. Draw me a storyboard: incorporating principles & techniques of comics. In: Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference, British Computer Society, 2010, pp. 133-142.
46. Dow S, Saponas TS, Li Y, Landay JA. External representations in ubiquitous computing design and the implications for design tools. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, ACM, 2006, pp. 241-250.
47. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K. Contextual design. Interactions. 1999;6 (1):32-42.
48. Hartson R, Pyla PS. The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Waltham, Massachusetts: Elsevier; 2012.