Enhancing domain-specific software architecture recovery

Proceedings - IEEE Workshop on Program Comprehension

Volumn 2003-May, Issue , 2003, Pages 266-273

  Ivkovic, I ^a   Godfrey, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; RECOVERY; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

APPLICATION DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; ARCHITECTURAL DOMAIN; ARCHITECTURE RECOVERY; DOMAIN SPECIFIC ARCHITECTURES; DOMAIN SPECIFIC SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES; LARGE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; LONG-LIVED SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84979070056     PISSN: 10928138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WPC.2003.1199211     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Bergey, D. Smith, N. Weiderman, and S. Woods. Options analysis for re-engineering (oar): Issues and conceptual approach. Technical Report CMU/SEI-99-TN-014, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1999.
2. P. Clements. From domain models to architectures. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Architecture 1994, Los Angeles, CA, 1994. USC Center for Software Engineering.
3. T. Connolly and C. Begg. Database Systems: A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation, and Management. Addison-Wesley, Essex, England, 2002.
4. I. B. M. Corporation. Db2 product family. Online, 2002. http://www.ibm.com/software/data/db2/.
5. S. Demeyer, T. Mens, and M. Wermelinger. Towards a software evolution benchmark. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE2001), Vienna, Austria, September 2001.
6. L. Ding and N. Medvidovic. Focus: A light-weight, incremental approach to software architecture recovery and evolution. In Proceedings of the 2001 Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2001), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, August 2001.
7. W. Eixelsberger. Recovery of a reference architecture: A case study. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software Architecture, Orlando, FL, November 1998.
8. R. R. Group. Rigi: A visual tool for understanding legacy systems. Online, 2000. http://www.rigi.csc.uvic.ca/.
9. R. C. Holt. Pbs: The portable bookshelf. Online, 2002. http://www.swag.uwaterloo.ca/pbs.
10. I. Ivkovic. Cp 317 - software engineering. Wilfrid Laurier University, Online, 2002. http://sauron.wlu.ca/physcomp/cp317/.
11. I. Ivkovic. Enhancing domain-specific software architecture recovery. Master's thesis, University of Waterloo, 2002.
12. L. Kean. Feature-oriented domain analysis. Software technology review, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/foda.html.
13. T. Mens. Proceedings of ecoop2002 workshop on benchmarks for empirical studies in object-oriented software evolution. Online, 2002. http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/dirk/ada-belgium/events/02/020610-ecoop-besoose.html.
14. S. R. Schach. Classical and Object-Oriented Software Engineering with UML and C++. WCB/McGraw-Hill, Reading, MA, 1998.
15. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996.
16. M. Shaw. The coming-of-age of software architecture research. ICSE 2001 Keynote Presentation, 2001.