Urban permeability for birds: An approach combining mobbing-call experiments and circuit theory

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 19, Issue , 2016, Pages 167-175

  Shimazaki, Atsushi ^a   Yamaura, Yuichi ^a,b   Senzaki, Masayuki ^a   Yabuhara, Yuki ^a   Akasaka, Takumi ^a,c   Nakamura, Futoshi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c OBIHIRO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Corridor; Dispersal habitat; Field experiment; Isolated tree; Matrix; Moving cost

Indexed keywords

BIRD; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FIELD SURVEY; HABITAT CORRIDOR; ISOLATED POPULATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MATRIX; MOBBING; URBAN REGION;

HOKKAIDO; JAPAN; SAPPORO;

AVES;

EID: 84978998628     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J.P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., Matthysen, E., The application of least-cost modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc. Urban Plann. 64 (2003), 233–247, 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00242-6.
2. Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A., Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models. Landsc. Ecol. 17 (2002), 219–231, 10.1023/A:1020260326889.
3. Bélisle, M., Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86 (2005), 1988–1995, 10.1890/04-0923.
4. Baguette, M., Blanchet, S., Legrand, D., Stevens, V.M., Turlure, C., Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biol. Rev. 88 (2013), 310–326, 10.1111/brv.12000.
5. Beier, P., Spencer, W., Baldwin, R.F., McRae, B.H., Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conserv. Biol. 25 (2011), 879–892, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x.
6. Cline, B.B., Hunter, M.L., Different open canopy vegetation types affect matrix permeability for a dispersing forest amphibian. J. Appl. Ecol. 51 (2014), 319–329, 10.1111/1365-2664.12197.
7. Creegan, H.P., Osboren, H.P., Gap-crossing decisions of woodland songbirds in Scotland: an experimental approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 42 (2005), 678–687, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01057.x.
8. Dallimer, M., Rouquette, J.R., Skinner, A.M.J., Armsworth, P.R., Maltby, L.M., Warren, P.H., Gaston, K.J., Contrasting patterns in species richness of birds, butterflies and plants along riparian corridors in an urban landscape. Divers. Distrib. 18 (2012), 742–753, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00891.x.
9. Desrochers, A., Hannon, S.J., Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conserv. Biol. 11 (1997), 1204–1210, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96187.x.
10. Desrochers, A., Hannon, S.J., Bélisle, M., St. Clair, C.C., Movement of songbirds in fragmented forests: can we ‘scale up’ from behavior to explain occupancy patterns in the landscapes?. Adams, N.J., Slotow, R.H., (eds.) Proc 22nd Int Ornithol Congr, Durban, 1999, 2447–2464.
11. Gillies, C.S., St. Clair, C.C., Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 19774–19779, 10.1073/pnas.0803530105.
12. Gillies, C.S., Beyer, H.L., St. Clair, C.C., Fine-scale movement decisions of tropical forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Ecol. Appl. 21 (2011), 944–954, 10.1890/09-2090.1.
13. Graves, T., Chandler, R.B., Royle, J.A., Beier, P., Kendall, K.C., Estimating landscape resistance to dispersal. Landsc. Ecol. 29 (2014), 1201–1211, 10.1007/s10980-014-0056-5.
14. Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X., Briggs, J.M., Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319 (2008), 756–760, 10.1126/science.1150195.
15. Haddad, N.M., Tewksbury, J.J., Low-quality habitat corridors as movement conduits for two butterfly species. Ecol. Appl. 15 (2005), 250–257, 10.1890/03-5327.
16. Haddad, N.M., Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am. Nat. 153 (1999), 215–227, 10.1086/303163.
17. Hodgson, P., French, K., Major, R.E., Avian movement across abrupt ecological edges: differential responses to housing density in an urban matrix. Landsc. Urban Plann. 79 (2007), 266–272, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.012.
18. Johnson, C.J., Parker, K.L., Heard, D.C., Gillingham, M.P., Movement parameters of ungulates and scale-specific responses to the environment. J. Anim. Ecol. 71 (2002), 225–235, 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00595.x.
19. Kéry, M., Introduction to WinBUGS for Ecologists: Bayesian Approach to Regression, ANOVA, Mixed Models and Related Analyses. 2010, Academic Press, San Diego.
20. Lima, S.L., Zollner, P.A., Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (1996), 131–135, 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81094-9.
21. McRae B.H., Shah, V., (2009) Circuitscape user guide. Available from http://www.circuitscape.org. (accessed November 2013).
22. McRae, B.H., Dickson, B.G., Keitt, T.H., Shah, V.B., Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89 (2008), 2712–2724, 10.1890/07-1861.1.
23. Miller, J.R., Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:3 (2005), 430–434, 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013.
24. Myczko, Ł., Rosin, Z.M., Skórka, P., Tryjanowski, P., Urbanization level and woodland size are major drivers of woodpecker species richness and abundance. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e94218, 10.1371/journal.pone.0094218.
25. Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P.J., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T.H., Rouget, M., Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 (2006), 681–687, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003.
26. Namba, T., Yabuhara, Y., Yukinari, K., Kurosawa, R., Changes in the avifauna of the Hokkaido University campus, Sapporo, detected by a long-term census. Ornithol. Sci. 9 (2010), 37–48, 10.2326/osj.9.37.
27. Natuhara, Y., Imai, C., Prediction of species richness of breeding birds by landscape-level factors of urban woods in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Biodivers. Conserv. 8 (1999), 239–253, 10.1023/A:1008869410668.
28. Richard, Y., Armstrong, D.P., Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data. J. Appl. Ecol. 47 (2010), 603–610, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01806.x.
29. Rosenberg, D.K., Noon, B.R., Megahan, J.W., Meslow, E.C., Compensatory behavior of Ensatina eschscholtzii in biological corridors: a field experiment. Can. J. Zool. 76 (1998), 117–133, 10.1139/cjz-76-1-117.
30. Savard, J.-P.L., Clergeau, P., Mennechez, G., Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landsc. Urban Plann. 48 (2000), 131–142, 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2.
31. Soga, M., Koike, S., Mapping the potential extinction debt of butterflies in a modern city: implications for conservation priorities in urban landscapes. Anim. Conserv. 16 (2013), 1–11, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00572.x.
32. Soga, M., Yamaura, Y., Koike, S., Gaston, K.J., Woodland remnants as an urban wildlife refuge: a cross-taxonomic assessment. Biodivers. Conserv. 23 (2014), 649–659, 10.1007/s10531-014-0622-9.
33. St. Clair, C.C., Comparative permeability of roads, rivers, and meadows to songbirds in Banff National Park. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003), 1151–1160, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02156.x.
34. Tremblay, M.A., St. Clair, C.C., Factors affecting the permeability of transportation and riparian corridors to the movements of songbirds in an urban landscape. J. Appl. Ecol. 46 (2009), 1314–1322, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01717.x.
35. Zeller, K.A., McGarigal, K., Whiteley, A.R., Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc. Ecol. 27 (2012), 777–797, 10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0.