Erratum: 'A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions' [Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 11, (2016), (91)], DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0457-8;A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions

Implementation Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Pérez, Dennis ^a   Van der Stuyft, Patrick ^b,c   Zabala, Maríadel Carmen ^d   Castro, Marta ^a   Lefèvre, Pierre ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA TROPICAL PEDRO KOURÍ   (Cuba)

^b INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAVANA   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Adaptive interventions; Conceptual framework; Cuba; Fidelity; Implementation; Reinvention; Translating research

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CUBA; DENGUE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH;

CUBA; DENGUE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 84978953877     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0471-x     Document Type: Erratum

References (69)

1. Sorensen G, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Johnston D. The implications of the results of community intervention trials. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:379-416.
2. Glasgow R, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1261-7.
3. Rychetnik L, Bauman A, Laws R, King L, Rissel C, Nutbeam D, Colagiuri S, Caterson I. Translating research for evidence-based public health: key concepts and future directions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66:1187-92.
4. Nutbeam D, Bauman A. Evaluation in a nutshell: a practical guide to the evaluation of health promotion programs. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 2006.
5. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication 231); 2005.
6. Glasgow RE. eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:119-26.
7. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement, challenges and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65-76.
8. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Heal Educ Res. 2003;18:237-56.
9. Sundell K, Beelmann A, Hasson H, von Thiele Schwarz U. Novel programs, international adoptions, or contextual adaptations? Meta-analytical results from German and Swedish intervention research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1020540.
10. Hall GE, Hord SM. Implementing change: patterns, principles, potholes. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
11. Backer TE: Finding the balance: program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: a state-of-the-art review. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. 2002. Available at: http://www.csun.edu/sites/default/files/FindingBalance1.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2010.
12. von Thiele Schwarz U, Hasson H, Lindfors P: Applying a fidelity framework to understand adaptations in an occupational health intervention. Work 2014, 51. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141840
13. Dane A, Schneider B. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? Clin Psychol Rev. 1998;18:23-45.
14. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Hansen WB, Walsh J, Falco M. Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions. Health Edu Res. 2005;20:308-13.
15. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40.
16. Bellg A, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci D, Ory M, Ogedegbe G, Orwig D, Ernst D, Czajkowski S. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behaviour change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23:443-51.
17. Borrelli B, Sepinwall D, Ernst D, Bellg AJ, Czajkowski S, Breger R, DeFrancesco C, Levesque C, Sharp DL, Ogedegbe G, Resnick B, Orwig D. A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:852-60.
18. Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:52-63.
19. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KL. A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev Sci. 2004;5:185-96.
20. Nahum-Shani I, Qian M, Almirall D, Pelham WE, Gnagy B, Fabiano G, Waxmonsky J, Yu J, Murphy S: Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions. Psychol Methods 2012,17: doi: 10.1037/a0029372
21. Rifkin SB. Paradigms lost: toward a new understanding of community participation in health programmes. Acta Trop. 1996;61:79-92.
22. Pérez D, Lefèvre P, Romero MI, Sánchez L, de Vos P, Van der Stuyft P. Augmenting frameworks for appraising practices of community-based health interventions. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24:335-41.
23. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
24. Rebchook MG, Kegeles SM, Huebner D, the TRIP Research Team. Translating research into practice: the dissemination and initial implementation of an evidence-based HIV prevention program. AIDS Educ Prev. 2006;18:119-36.
25. Bauman LJ, Stein RE, Ireys HT. Reinventing fidelity: the transfer of social technology among settings. Am J Community Psychol. 1991;19:619-39.
26. Rice RE, Rogers EM. Reinvention in the innovation process. Sci Commun. 1980;1:449-514.
27. Goodman RM, Steckler AB. A framework for assessing program institutionalization. Knowledge Soc Int J Knowledge Tranfer. 1989;2:52-66.
28. Goodman RM, Steckler AB. A model for institutionalization of health promotion programs. Fam Commu Health. 1989;11:63-78.
29. Shediac-Rizkallah MC, Bone LR. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Edu Res. 1998;13:87-108.
30. Pluye P, Potvin L, Denis JL. Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability. Eval Program Plann. 2004;27:121-33.
31. Pluye P, Potvin L, Denis JL, Pelletier J, Mannoni C. Program sustainability begins with the first events. Eval Program Plann. 2005;28:123-37.
32. Lara M, Bryant-Stephens T, Damitz M, Findley S, González Gavillán J, Mitchell H, Ohadike YU, Persky VW, Ramos Valencia G, Rojas Smith L, Rosenthal M, Thyne S, Uyeda K, Viswanathan M, Woodell C. Balancing "fidelity" and community context in the adaptation of asthma evidence-based interventions in the "real world". Health Promot Pract. 2011. doi: 10.1177/1524839911414888. http://hpp.sagepub.com/content/12/6_suppl_1/63S.full.pdf+html.
33. Pérez D: Procesos de implementación de estrategias participativas en el control de aedes aegypti. Propuestas para su evaluación y transformación. Thesis Dissertation, Cuba: Havana University; 2011
34. Arthur MS, Blitz C. Bridging the gap between research and practice in drug abuse prevention through needs assessment and strategic community planning. J Community Psychol. 2000;28:241-56.
35. Backer TE. The failure of success: challenges of disseminating effective substance abuse prevention programs. J Community Psychol. 2000;28:363-73.
36. Berman P. Thinking about programmed and adaptive implementation: matching strategies to situations. In: Ingram H, Mann D, editors. Why policies succeed or fail. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1980.
37. Berman P, McLaughlin MW. Implementation of educational innovation. Educ Forum. 1976;40:345-70.
38. Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res Policy. 1988;17:251-67.
39. Stirman SW, Miller CJ, Toder K, Calloway A. Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2013;8:65.
40. Dissemination Working Group. Common elements of developing and implementing program models. Calgary: FYI Consulting Ltd; 1999.
41. Winter SG, Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ Sci. 2001;12:730-43.
42. Hernandez M, Hodges S. Building upon the theory of change for systems of care. J Emot Behav Disord. 2003;11:19-26.
43. Gubler DJ. Dengue, urbanization and globalization: the unholy trinity of the 21st century. Trop Med Health. 2011;39 Suppl 4:3-11.
44. Stoddard ST, Forshey BM, Morrison AC, Paz-Soldan VA, Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Astete H, Reiner RC Jr, Vilcarromero S, Elder JP, Halsey ES, Kochel TJ, Kitron U, Scott TW. House-to-house human movement drives dengue virus transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;15:994-9.
45. Guzmán MG, Rodríguez-Roche R, Kourí G. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Tropicale. 2006;11:1-2.
46. WHO. Dengue and severe dengue [factsheet no. 117]. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2012. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/. Accessed 26 Jan 2015.
47. Parks W, Lloyd L: Planning social mobilization and communication for dengue fever prevention and control: a step-by-step guide. WHO/CDS/WMC/2004.2; 2004.
48. Parks W, Lloyd L, Nathan M, Hosein E, Odugleh A, Clark G, Gluber DJ. International experiences in social mobilization and communication for dengue prevention and control. Dengue Bulletin. 2004;28(Suppl):1-7.
49. San Martín JL, Prado M. Percepción de riesgo y estrategias de comunicación social sobre el dengue en las Américas. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2004;15:135-9.
50. Toledo ME, Baly A, Vanlerberghe V, Rodriguez M, Benitez JR, Duvergel J, Van der Stuyft P. The unbearable lightness of technocratic efforts at dengue control. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:728-36.
51. Toledo ME, Vanlerberghe V, Baly A, Ceballos E, Valdes L, Searret M, Boelaert M, Van der Stuyft P. Towards active community participation in dengue vector control: results from action research in Santiago de Cuba, Cuba. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:56-63.
52. Sánchez L, Pérez D, Alfonso L, Castro M, Sánchez LM, Van der Stuyft P, Kourí G. Estrategia de educación popular para promover la participación comunitaria en la prevención del dengue. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2008;24:61-9.
53. Sánchez L, Pérez D, Cruz G, Castro M, Kouri G, Shkedy Z, Vanlerberghe V, Van der Stuyft P. Intersectoral coordination, community empowerment and dengue prevention: six years of controlled interventions in Playa Municipality, Havana, Cuba. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:1356-64.
54. Vanlerberghe V, Toledo ME, Rodriguez M, Gomez D, Baly A, Benitez JR, Van der Stuyft P. Community involvement in dengue vector control: cluster randomized trial. BMJ. 2009;338:b1959. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1959.
55. Castro M, Sánchez L, Pérez D, Carbonell N, Lefèvre P, Vanlerberghe V, Van der Stuyft P. A community empowerment strategy embedded in a routine dengue vector control programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trans R Soc TropMed Hyg. 2012;106:315-21.
56. Nam VS, Nguyen TY, Tran VP, Truong UN, Le QM, Le VL, Le TN, Bektas A, Briscombe A, Aaskov JG, Ryan PA, Kay BH. Elimination of dengue by community programs using Mesocyclops (Copepoda) against Aedes aegypti in central Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72:67-73.
57. Kay B, Nam VS. New strategy against Aedes aegypti in Vietnam. Lancet. 2005;365:613-7.
58. Kay BH, Tuyet Hanh TT, Le NH, Quy TM, Nam VS, Hang PV, Yen NT, Hill PS, Vos T, Ryan PA. Sustainability and cost of a community-based strategy against Aedes aegypti in northern and central Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:822-30.
59. Rifkin SB. Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: a review of the literature. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29:98-106.
60. Pérez D: Disclosing implementation, replication and diffusion processes of an empowerment strategy for dengue prevention and control. Thesis Dissertation. Ghent: Ghent University; 2015
61. Pérez D, Lefèvre P, Castro M, Sánchez L, Toledo ME, Vanlerbergue V, Van der Stuyft P. Process-oriented fidelity research assists in evaluation, adjustment and scaling up of community-based interventions. Health Policy Plan. 2010;26:413-22.
62. Creswell J, Clarck VP. Design and conducting mixed methods research. Washington DC: Sage Publications; 2011.
63. Hasson H. Study protocol: systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implement Sci. 2010;5:67.
64. Hasson H et al. Fidelity and moderating factors in complex interventions: a case study of a continuum of care program for frail elderly people in health and social care. Implement Sci. 2012;7:23.
65. Gagliardi AR, Straus SE, Shojania KG, Urbach DR. Multiple interacting factors influence adherence, and outcomes associated with surgical safety checklists: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2014;26:9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108585. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178177/pdf/pone.0108585.pdf.
66. Freire P. La educación liberadora. Madrid: Akal; 1981.
67. Arai L, Roen K, Roberts H, Popay J. It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Southampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors. Injury Prevention. 2005;11:148-51.
68. Roen K, Arai L, Roberts H, Popay J. Extending systematic reviews to include evidence on implementation: methodological work on a review of community-based initiatives to prevent injuries. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:1060-71.
69. Pérez D, Lefèvre P, Castro M, Toledo ME, Zamora G, Bonet M, Van der Stuyft P. Diffusion of community empowerment strategies for Aedes aegypti control in Cuba: a muddling through experience. Soc Sci Med. 2013;84:44-52.