Multiple criteria: The mandate and the challenge

Roeper Review

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1997, Pages A4-A6

  Frasier, Mary M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978906679     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199709553868     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baldwin, A. Y. (1985). Programs for the gifted and talented: Issues concerning minority populations. In F. D. Horowitz & M. M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 223-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Bernal, E. M. (1990). The identification blues and how to cure them. CAG Communicator, 20(3), 1, 27.
3. Callahan, C. M., Tomlinson, C. A., & Pizzat, P. M. (Eds.), (n.d.). Contexts for promise: Noteworthy practices and innovations in the identification of gifted students. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
4. Cowan, R. S., & Gollmar, S. M. (1994). Breaking traditional barriers: A new paradigm for gifted programs (Interim Report No. 1). Lawrenceville, GA: Gwinnett County Public Schools.
5. Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Treffinger, D. (1992). Bringing out the giftedness in your child: Nurturing every child's unique strengths, talents, and potential. New York: John Wiley.
6. Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J., III. (1991). On discovering the hidden treasures of gifted and talented African American children. Roeper Review, 13(1), 27-33.
7. Frasier, M. M. (1991). Instruction manual: Using the Frasier Talent Assessment Profile (F-TAP). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.
8. Frasier, M. M. (1994). A manual for implementing the Frasier Talent Assessment Profile (F-TAP): A multiple criteria model for the identification and education of gifted students. Athens, GA: Georgia Southern Press.
9. Frasier, M. M.(1995). Multiple criteria: What? why? how?. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, The Torrance Center for Creative Studies.
10. Frasier, M. M., Garcia, J. H., & Passow, A. H. (1994) A Review of assessment issues in gifted education and their implications for identifying gifted minority students. Research Monograph 95203. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
11. Frasier, M. M., Hunsaker, S. L., Frank, E., Finley, V., & Lee, J. (1994). An exploratory study of the effectiveness of the Staff Development Model (SDM) and the Research- Based Assessment Plan (RAP) in improving the identification of gifted economically disadvantaged students. Technical Report, Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.
12. Frasier, M. M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Towards a new paradigm for identifying talent potential. Research Monograph 94112. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
13. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
14. Gardner, H. (1988). The waning of intelligence tests. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.). What is intelligence?: Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Hadaway, N., & Marek-Schroer, M. F. (1992). Multidimensional assessment of the gifted minority student. Roeper Review, 25(2), 73-77.
16. Hunsaker, S. L., Frasier, M. M., Finley, V., Frank, E., Martin, D., Garcia, J., & King, L. (1994). A report on the National Field Test of the Staff Development (SDM) and the Research-Based Assessment Plan (RAP) (Report No. 1). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
17. Hunsaker, S. L., Frasier, M. M., Frank, E., Finley, V., & Klekotka, P. (1994). Program performance of economically disadvantaged students placed in gifted programs through the research-based assessment plan: Technical report of the pilot project in its second year (Technical Report No. 1). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
18. Jenkins-Friedman, R. (1982). Myth: Cosmetic use of multiple selection criteria! Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 24-26.
19. Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 41-50.
20. O'Connell Ross, P. (1993). National excellence: The case for developing America's talent Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents.
21. Patton, J. (1992). Assessment and identification of African-American learners with gifts and talents. Exceptional Children, 59(2), 150-159.
22. Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M. & Tomchin, E. M. (1996). Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(2), 81-92.
23. Richert, E. S., Alvino, X, & McDonnel, R. (1982). The national report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth. Sewell, NJ: Educational Improvement Center-South.
24. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(180-184; 261).
25. Renzulli, J. S. (1988). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26. Runco, M. A. (1997). Is every child gifted? Roeper Review, 19(4), 220-224.
27. Schmeichel, J. (1994). Comparing F-TAP to traditional identification in terms of student progress (Evaluation Report No. 1). Kalamazoo, MI: Kalamazoo Public Schools.
28. Stemberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269-315.
29. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A triarchic view of intelligence in cross-cultural perspective. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context (pp. 60-85). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Treffinger, D. J. (1982). Demythologizing gifted education: An editorial essay. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(1), 3-8.