A roadmap towards integrated assessment and participatory strategies in support of decision-making processes. The case of urban waste management

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 142, Issue , 2017, Pages 157-172

  Hornsby, C ^a   Ripa, M ^b   Vassillo, C ^b   Ulgiati, S ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES PARTHENOPE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biomass fuels; Participatory decision making; Solid waste management; Stakeholder consultancy; Sustainability science; Sustainable transition

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FUELS; SOLID WASTES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BIOMASS FUELS; INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT; LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS; MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES; SOCIO-ECONOMIC BENEFITS; STAKEHOLDER CONSULTANCY; SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE; SUSTAINABLE TRANSITION;

WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84978903972     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.189     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Home page of Ajzen, I.: Research Interests. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/research.html.
2. Ajzen, I., December 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (2), 179-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
3. Commissione Parlamentare di Inchiesta sul ciclo dei rifiuti - sulle attività illecite adesso connesse. (Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry about the cycle of wastes and of illegal related activities). In: Barbieri, Roberto, Paglionica, Donato (Eds.), 2007. Relazione Territoriale Stralcio Sulla Campania [Extract of the Report related to the Campania area]. Rome, Italy.
4. Becker, M.H., 1974. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior. Charles B. Slack, Thorofare, NJ.
5. Bernhard, B., 11 Mar. 2004. "The End of the Karlsruhe Garbage Miracle [Das Karlsruhe Müllwunderist Am Ende],". Die Tageszeitung, Germany.
6. Chambers, R., 2008. PRA, PLA and pluralism: practice and theory. In: Reason, P., Bradbury, H. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage, pp. 297-318.
7. Clausen, A., Giani, H., Feil, A., Pretz, Th, 2013. Processing concept for the production of biomass fuel from mixed municipal solid waste. In: Cossu, R., He, P., Kjeldsen, P., Matsufuji, Y., Reinhard, D., Stegmann, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Sardinia, Italy, 30.09-4.10.2013. Cisa Publisher, Padova, Italy.
8. On-line article Environmental Justice Organisations Liabilities and Trade De Rosa, S.P., Nov 2013. "The "Raging River" Unites Struggles against Waste Disposal and Biocide in Campania". http://www.ejolt.org/2013/11/wasteconflicts-in-campania-and-the-common-struggle-against-biocide-join-hands/.
9. EU - COM, 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/pdf/com2011_571.
10. European Union [EU], 1999. Council directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. Official J. L 182.
11. European Environmental Bureau (EEB), 2014. Advancing Resource Efficiency in Europe. Indicators and Waste Policy Scenarios to Deliver a Resource Efficient and Sustainable Europe. http://www.eeb.org/EEB.
12. Online article in the Business week by Faris, S., April 2012. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-04-12/italians-rail-against-a-high-speed-train-project.
13. Finnveden, G., 1999. Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems. J. Clean. Prod. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 26, 173-187.
14. Fiorentino, G., Ripa, M., Protano, G., Hornsby, C., Ulgiati, S., 2015. Life cycle assessment of mixed municipal solid waste: multi-input versus multi-output perspective. Waste Manag. 46, 599-611.
15. Giampietro, M., 2003a. Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Agro-ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Giampietro, M., Ramos-Martin, J., 2005. Multi-scale integrated analysis of sustainability: a methodological tool to improve the quality of the narratives. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 5 (No. 3/4), 119-141.
17. Giampietro, M., 2003b. Complexity and scales: the challenge for integrated assessment. In: Rotmans, J., Rothman, D.S. (Eds.), Scaling Issues in Integrated Assessment. Swets&Zeitlinger B.V, Lissen, The Netherlands, pp. 293-327.
18. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., Ramos-Martin, J., 2009. Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): theoretical concepts and basic rationale. Energy 34 (3), 313-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.020.
19. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., Ramos-Martin, J., 2009. Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): theoretical concepts and basic rationale. Energy 34 (3), 313-322.
20. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., Sorman, A.H., 2012. The Metabolic Pattern of Society: where Economists Fall Short. Routledge, p. 408.
21. Online document Hall, D., Feb 2010. Waste Management in Europe: Framework, Trends and Issues. A Report Commissioned by the European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU). http://www.epsu.org/IMG/pdf/it_10_2010-02_Waste_trends-3.pdf.
22. Hochbaum, G., 1958. Public Participation in Medical Screening Programs: a Sociopsychological Study. (Public Health Service Publication No. 572). Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
23. Higgs, G., 2006. Integrating multi-criteria techniques with geographical information systems inwaste facility location to enhance public participation.Waste Manag. Res. 2006 (24), 105.
24. Huttenen, S., Manninen, K., Leskinen, P., 2014. Combining biogas LCA reviews with stakeholder interviews to analyse life cycle impacts at a practical level. J. Clean. Prod. 80, 5-16.
25. Janssen, R., 2001. On the use of Multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in The Netherlands. J. Multi-criteria Decis. Analysis 10, 101-109.
26. Kangas, J., Kangas, A., Leskinen, P., Pykalainen, J., 2001. MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 10, 257-271.
27. Lindsay, J.J., Strathman, A., 1997. Predictors of recycling behaviour: an application of a modified health belief model. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 27, 1799-1823.
28. Morrissey, A.J., Browne, J., 2004. Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Manag. 24, 297-308.
29. Munda, G.A., 2006. NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. 6 (No. 1-2), 65-78.
30. Norese, M.F., 2006. ELECTRE III as a support for participatory decision-making on the localisation of waste treatment plants. Land Use Policy 23, 76-85.
31. Green action for Health and Environmental Justice 415-248-5010; Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) 510-883-9490 Online document Incinerators in Disguise. Case Studies of Gasification, Pyrolysis, and Plasma in Europe, Asia, and the United States, April 2006. http://www.ace-wa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Incinerators-in-Disguise_-Case-Studies-of-Gasification-Pyrolysis-and-Plasma-in-Europe-Asia-and-the-United-States-.pdf.
32. Online Document EU Official Guidelines for Stakeholder Consultation, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/docs/scgl_pc_questionnaire_en.pdf.
33. Petts, J., 2004. Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions: evidence from waste management. J. Risk Res. 7, 115-133.
34. Petts, J., Homan, J., Pollard, S., 2003. Participatory Risk Assessment: Involving Lay Audiences in Environmental Decisions on Risk. R&D Technical Report E2-043/TR/01. Environment Agency, Bristol, p. 281.
35. Reason, P., Bradbury, H., 2008. The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage, CA., ISBN 978-1412920292.
36. Rogers, Everett, 16 August 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, fifth ed. Simon and Schuster, ISBN 978-0-7432-5823-4.
37. Rosenstock, I.M., 1974. The Health Belief Model and preventive health behavior. Health EducMonogr 2, 354-386.
38. Rwckwitz, A., 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5, 243-263.
39. Sechrest, L., et al., 1972. Problems of translation in cross-cultural psychology. J. Cross-cultural Psychol. 3 (1), 41-56.
40. Sharma, M., Romas, J.A., 2012. Theoretical Foundations of Health Education and Health Promotion. Jones and Bartlett Learning, London.
41. Shmelev, S.E., Powell, J.R., 2006. Ecological-economic modeling for strategic regional waste management systems. Ecol. Econ. 59, 119.
42. Smith, A., 2007. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and sociotechnical regimes. Technol. Analysis Strategic Manag. 19, 427-450.
43. Online documents UNEP, Objective Oriented Planning, Module 1,Improving Municipal Wastewater Management in Coastal Cities Stakeholder Engagement, http://www.pacificwater.org/userfiles/file/IWRM/Toolboxes/STAKEHOLDER%20Engagement/STAKEHOLDERS_ANALYSIS.pdf. Accessed 08.01 2015.
44. Vigileos, G., 2002. Analysis of Institutional Structures for Sustainable Solid Waste Management for the South West of England (PhD thesis). University of Gloucestershire, UK.
45. Vijver, F.J.R., et al., 2008. Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York.