On the use of databases about research performance: comments on Karlovčec and Mladenić (2015) and others using the SICRIS database

Scientometrics

Volumn 109, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 2151-2157

  Rodela, Romina ^a,b  

^a SÖDERTÖRN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinarity; Measurements of interdisciplinarity; Policy tools; Research evaluation; Scientific collaborations; SICRIS

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978873794     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2073-4     Document Type: Letter

References (13)

1. Čadež, S., Dimovski, V., & Okorn, K. (2013). Raziskovalna produktivnost in ustvarjanje znanja v slovenskih ekonomsko-poslovnih šolah. Eonomic and Business Review, 15(2), 75–96.
2. Demšar, F., & Boh, T. (2008). Uvajanje načel transparentnost v delo javne uprave: Primer Javne agencije za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije. Družboslovne Razprave, XXIV(58), 89–105.
3. Ferligoj, A., Kronegger, L., Mali, F., Snijders, T. B., & Doreian, P. (2015). Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system. Scientometrics, 104, 985–1012.
4. Good, B., Vermeulen, N., Tiefenthaler, B., & Arnold, E. (2015). Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation, 24, 91–105.
5. Južnič, P., Pečlin, S., Žaucer, M., Mandelj, T., Pušnik, M., & Demšar, F. (2010). Scientometric indicators: Peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests. Scientometrics, 85, 429–441.
6. Karlovčec, M., & Mladenić, D. (2015). Interdisciplinarity of scientific fields and its evolution based on graph of project collaboration and co-authoring. Scientometrics, 102, 433–454.
7. Kojima, T., & Patrick Barron, J. (2016). Potentially dangerous mistakes in publication ethics: Unethical authorship. The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, 49, 469–471.
8. Kronegger, L., Ferligoj, A., & Doreian, P. (2011). On the dynamics of national scientific systems. Quality and Quantity, 45, 989–1015.
9. Kronegger, L., Mali, F., Ferligoj, A., & Doreian, P. (2012). Collaboration structures in Slovenian scientific communities. Scientometrics, 90, 631–647.
10. Lužar, B., Levnajić, Z., Povh, J., & Perc, M. (2014). Community structure and the evolution of interdisciplinarity in slovenia’s scientific collaboration network. PLoS One, 9, e94429.
11. Mali, F. (2013). Why an unbiased external evaluation system is important for the progress of social sciences: The case of a small social science community. Social Sciences, 2, 284.
12. Mataković, H., Pejić Bach, M., & Radočaj Novak, I. (2013). Scientific productivity in transition countries: Trends and obstacles. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 11(2), 174–189.
13. Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., et al. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 14–26.