Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, are the 72 hours still the rule? A randomized trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 264, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 717-722

  Roulin, Didier ^a   Saadi, Alend ^a   Di Mare, Luca ^a   Demartines, Nicolas ^a   Halkic, Nermin ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

72 hours symptoms; acute cholecystitis; early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy; randomized trial

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN PLUS CLAVULANIC ACID;

ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; ANALGESIA; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BILIARY PERITONITIS; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLELITHIASIS; CHRONIC CHOLECYSTITIS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY INTERVENTION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THERAPY DELAY; TREATMENT DURATION; AGED; CHOLECYSTITIS, ACUTE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOSPITAL COST; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLECYSTITIS, ACUTE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84978757675     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001886     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:15-26.
2. Hadad SM, Vaidya JS, Baker L, et al. Delay from symptom onset increases the conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.World J Surg. 2007;31:1298-1301.
3. Degrate L, Ciravegna AL, Luperto M, et al. Acute cholecystitis: The golden 72-h period is not a strict limit to perform early cholecystectomy. Results from 316 consecutive patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398: 1129-1136.
4. Gomes RM, Mehta NT, Varik V, et al. No 72-hour pathological boundary for safe early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A clinicopathological study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26:340-345.
5. Zhu B, Zhang Z, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions. World J Surg. 2012;36:2654-2658.
6. Wu XD, Tian X, Liu MM, et al. Meta-analysis comparing early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2015;102: 1302-1313.
7. Miura F, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013; 20:47-54.
8. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:834-840.
9. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:35-46.
10. Vuilleumier H, Halkic N. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: Implementation and audit of 136 consecutive cases in a university hospital. World J Surg. 2004;28:737-740.
11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213.
12. Thompson SG, Barber JA. How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?. BMJ. 2000;320:1197-1200.
13. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G-Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149-1160.
14. Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010;97: 141-150.
15. Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, et al. Acute cholecystitis: Early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg. 2013;258:385-393.
16. Banz V, Gsponer T, Candinas D, et al. Population-based analysis of 4113 patients with acute cholecystitis: Defining the optimal time-point for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254:964-970.
17. de Mestral C, Laupacis A, Rotstein OD, et al. Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A population-based retrospective cohort study of variation in practice. CMAJ Open. 2013;1:E62-E67.
18. Zafar SN, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B, et al. Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg. 2015; 150:129-136.
19. Lee AY, Carter JJ, Hochberg MS, et al. The timing of surgery for cholecystitis: A review of 202 consecutive patients at a large municipal hospital. Am J Surg. 2008;195:467-470.
20. Wu JX, Nguyen AT, de Virgilio C, et al. Can it wait until morning?. A comparison of nighttime versus daytime cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 2014;208:911-918; discussion 917-918.