Association between contextual dependence and replicability in psychology may be spurious

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 34, 2016, Pages E4933-E4934

  Inbar, Yoel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; CONTEXTUAL DEPENDENCE; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; REPLICATION STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERSONALITY; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84978756567     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1608676113     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Open Science Collaboration (2015) PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716.
2. Van Bavel JJ, Mende-Siedlecki P, Brady WJ, Reinero DA (2016) Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(23):6454-6459.