The Effect of Sex and Feminist Orientation on Perceptions in Sexually Harrassing Communication

Women's Studies in Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 25-44

  Berryman Fink, Cynthia ^a   Riley, Kimberly Vanover ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978666501     PISSN: 07491409     EISSN: 2152999X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07491409.1997.10162399     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G., 1991. Multiple regression:Testing and interpreting interactions, Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
2. Armor, D. J., 1971. “ Theta reliability and factor scaling ”. In Sociological methodology, Edited by:Costner, H. L., 71–50. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
3. Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., and Cutler, B. D., 1990. Perceptions of sexual harassment:A re-examination of gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 124:409–416.
4. Barr, P. A., 1993. Perceptions of sexual harassment. Sociological Inquiry, 63:460–470.
5. Beauvais, K., 1986. Workshops to combat sexual harassment:A case study of changing attitudes. Signs, 12:130–145.
6. Berryman-Fink, C., and Verderber, K. S., 1985. Attributions of the term feminism:A factor analytic development of a measuring instrument. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9:51–64.
7. Bingham, S. B., 1994. “ Introduction:Framing sexual harassment—Defining a discursive focus of study ”. In Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice, Edited by:Bingham, S. G., 1–14. Westport, CT:Praeger.
8. Booth-Butterfreld, M., 1986. Recognizing and communicating in harassment-prone organizational climates. Women's Studies in Communication, 9:41–55.
9. Booth-Butterfield, M., 1989. Perceptions of harassing communication as a function of locus of control, work force participation, and gender. Communication Quarterly, 37:262–275.
10. Clair, R. P., 1994. “ Hegemony and harassment:A discursive practice ”. In Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice, Edited by:Bingham, S. G., 59–70. Westport, CT:Praeger.
11. Coles, F., 1986. Forced to quit:Sexual harassment complaints and agency response. Sex Roles, 14:81–95.
12. Collins, E., and Blodgett, T., 1981. Sexual harassment:Some see it, some won't. Harvard Business Review, 59:76–96.
13. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 1980. Interpretive guidelines on sexual harassment. Federal Register, 45:74677
14. Fitzgerald, L. F., and Ormerod. 1991. Perceptions of sexual harassment:The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 75:281–294.
15. Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., Friedman, P. G., and Kreps, G. L., 1991. Investigating communication:An introduction to research methods, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
16. Gill, M. M., 1993. “ Academic sexual harassment:Perceptions of behaviors ”. In Sexual harassment:Communication implications, Edited by:Kreps, G. L., 149–169. Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press.
17. Grauerholz, E., 1994. “ Gender socialization and communication:The inscription of sexual harassment in social life ”. In Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice, Edited by:Bingham, S. G., 33–44. Westport, CT:Praeger.
18. Gutek, B. A., 1985. Sex and the workplace, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
19. Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., and Konrad, A. M., 1990. Predicting social-sexual behavior at work:A contact hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 33:560–577.
20. Gutek, B. A., Morasch, B., and Cohen, A. G., 1983. Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22:30–48.
21. Jaschik, M. L., and Fretz, B. R., 1991. Women's perceptions of labeling of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 25:19–23.
22. Jensen, I. W., and Gutek, B. A., 1982. Attributions and assignment of responsibility in sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38:121–136.
23. Kenig, S., and Ryan, J., 1986. Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles, 15:535–549.
24. Konrad, A. M., and Gutek, B. A., 1986. Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31:422–438.
25. Kremer, J. M. D., and Marks, J., 1992. Sexual harassment:The response of management and trade unions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65:5–15.
26. Lee, L. A., and Heppner, P. P., 1991. The development and evaluation of a sexual harassment inventory. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69:512–517.
27. Lott, B., Reilly, M. E., and Howard, D. R., 1982. Sexual assault and harassment:A campus community case study. Signs, 8:296–319.
28. Marks, M. A., and Nelson, E. S., 1993. Sexual harassment on campus:Effects of professor gender on perceptions of sexually harassing behavior. Sex Roles, 28:207–217.
29. Padgett, S., and Padgett, J., 1986. Cognitive structures of sexual harassment. Journal of College Student Personnel, 27:34–39.
30. Popovich, P. M., Gehlauf, D. N., Jolton, J. A., Somers, J. M., and Godinho, R. M., 1992. Perceptions of sexual harassment as a function of sex of rater and incident form and consequence. Sex Roles, 27:609–625.
31. Powell, G., 1986. Effects of sex role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 14:9–19.
32. Pryor, J. B., 1985. The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 5/6:273–286.
33. Reilly, M., Lott, B., and Gallogly, S., 1986. Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles, 15:333–358.
34. Schneider, B. E., 1982. Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers. Journal of Social Issues, 38:75–98.
35. Sheffey, S., and Tindale, R. S., 1992. Perceptions of sexual harassment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22:1502–1520.
36. Simon, H. A., 1991. Ellison v Brady:A “reasonable woman” standard for sexual harassment. Employee Relations Law Journal, 17:71–80.
37. Smith, E. R., Feree, M. M., and Miller, F. D., 1975. A short scale of attitudes toward feminism. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6:51–56.
38. Terpstra, D. E., and Baker, D. D., 1986. Psychological and demographic correlates of perceptions of sexual harassment. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 112:459–478.
39. Terpstra, D. E., and Baker, D. D., 1987. A hierarchy of sexual harassment. Journal of Psychology, 121:599–605.
40. Terpstra, D. E., and Baker, D. D., 1989. The identification and classification of reactions to sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10:1–14.
41. Thacker, R. A., and Gohmann, S. F., 1993. Male/female differences in perceptions and effects of hostile environment sexual harassment:Reasonable assumptions?. Public Personnel Management, 22:461–472.
42. Wood, J. T., 1994. “ Saying it makes it so:The discursive construction of sexual harassment ”. In Conceptualizing sexual harassment as discursive practice, Edited by:Bingham, S. G., 17–32. Westport, CT:Praeger.