From expert knowledge to formal ontologies for semantic interpretation of the urban environment from satellite images

International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 55-65

  De Beuvrona, François De Bertrand ^a   Marc Zweckera, Stella ^a   Puissant, Anne ^a   Zanni Merka, Cecilia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Ontology; OWL; Satellite imagery; Semantic interpretation; SWRL; Urban environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978489885     PISSN: 13272314     EISSN: 18758827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/KES-130264     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. F. Dell’Acqua, P. Gamba and D. Polli, Very high resolution spaceborne synthetic aperture radar and urban areas: Looking into details of a complex envionment, in: Urban Remote Sensing:Monitoring, Synthesis and Modeling in the Urban Environment, (First Edition), Wileys Sons, 2011, pp. 63-73.
2. G. Forestier, A. Puissant, C. Wemmert and A. Gançarski, Knowledge-based region labeling for remote sensing image interpretation, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 36(5) (2012), 470-480.
3. A. Smeulders, M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta and R. Jain, Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(12) (2000), 1349-1380.
4. M. Herold, J. Scepan, A. Muller and S. Gunter, Objectoriented mapping and analysis of urban landuse/cover using ikonos data, in: Proceedings of 22nd Earsel symposium geoinformation for European-wide integration, Prague, 2002, pp. 531-538.
5. U. Benz, P. Hofmann, G. Willhauck, I. Lingenfelder and M. Heynen, Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for gis-ready information, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 58 (2004), 239-258.
6. E. Baltasavias, Object extraction and revision by image analysis using existing geodata and knowledge: Current status and steps towards operational systems, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 58 (2004), 129-151.
7. L. Provencher and J.M. Dubois, Précis de télédétection, Méthodes de photointerprétation et d’interprétation d’image, Vol. 4, Presses de l’Université du Québec, 2007, pp. 468.
8. B. Cuenca Grau, I. Horrocks, B. Motik, B. Parsia, P. Patel-Schneider and U. Sattler, OWL 2: The next step for OWL, Web Semant 6(4) (2008), 309-322, DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2008.05.001.
9. I. Horrocks, P.F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof and M. Dean, SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, May 2004, Available from http:// www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/.
10. R. Clouard, A. Renouf and M. Revenu, An ontology-based model for representing image processing application objectives, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 24(8) (2010), 1181-1208.
11. T.R. Gruber, Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing, in: Proc of International Workshop on Formal Ontology, 1993.
12. R. Studer, V.R. Benjamins and D. Fensel, Knowledge engineering:Principles and methods, IEEE Transactions on Data and Knowledge Engineering 25(162) (1998), 161-197.
13. N. Maillot and M. Thonnat, Ontology based complex object recognition, Image and Vision Computing 26(1) (2008), 102-113, ISSN: 0262-8856, 10.1016/j.imavis.2005.07.027.
14. J. Teller, A. Keita, C. Roussey and R. Laurini, Urban ontologies for an improved communication in urban civil engineering projects, Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography (2007), DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.8322.
15. T.H. Kolbe, Representing and exchanging 3d city models with citygml, in: 3D Geo-Information Sciences, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, J. Lee and S. Zlatanova, eds, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 15-31.
16. F. Fonseca, M. Egenhofer, P. Agouris and G. Camara, Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems, Transactions in GIS 6(3) (2002), 231-257.
17. H.T. Uitermark, P.J.M. Oosterom, N.J.I. Mars and M. Molenaar, Ontology-based geographic data set integration, in: International Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Database Management, STDBM, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, September, 1999.
18. J.M. Almendros-Jimenez, J.A. Piedra and M. Canton, An ontology-based modelling of an ocean satellite image retrieval system, in: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2010, pp. 2237-2240.
19. I.R. Farah, W. Messaoudi, K. Saheb Ettaba and B. Solaiman, Satellite image retrieval based on ontology merging, Graphics, Vision and Image Processing (GVIP) 8(2) (2008), 45-53.
20. N. Maillot and M. Thonnat, Ontology-based complex object recognition, Image and Vision Computing 26(1) (2008), 102-113.
21. S. Coradeschi and A. Saffiotti, An introduction to the anchoring problem, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 43(2-3)(2003), 85-96.
22. T. Berk, L. Brownston and A. Kaufman, A new color-naming system for graphics languages, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2(3) (1982), 37-44.
23. M. Fernández López, A. Gomez-Pérez, J.P. Sierra and A.P. Sierra, Building a chemical ontology using methodonlogy and ontology design environment, IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(1)(1999), 37-46.
24. G. Schreiber, H. Hakkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. Van de Velde and B. Wielinga, Knowledge engineering and management, The CommonKADS methodology, MIT Press, 2000.
25. T.D.B. Tran, A. Puissant, D. Badariotti and C. Weber, Optimizing spatial resolution of imagery for urban form detection-the case of france and vietnam, remote sensing, Special Issue ‘Urban Remote Sensing’ 3 (2011), 2128-2147, doi:10.3390/rs3102128.
26. Stanford Center For Biomedical Informatics Research, http:// protege.stanford.edu/.
27. D.A. Randell, Z. Cui and A.G. Cohn, A spatial logic based on regions and connection, in: 3rd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992, pp. 165-176.
28. F. Hogenboom, B. Borgman, F. Frasincar and U. Kaymak, Spatial knowledge representation on the semantic web, in:Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC’10, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2010, pp. 252-259.
29. B. Glimm, I. Horrocks and B. Motik, Optimized description logic reasoning via core blocking, in: Proc of the 5th Int Joint Conf on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2010), volume 6173 of LNCS, Springer, Edinburgh, UK, 2010, pp. 457-471.
30. F. Fonseca, M. Egenhofer, P. Agouris and G. Camara, Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems, Transactions in GIS 6(3) (2002).
31. PRONTO: An extension of Pellet that enables probabilistic knowledge representation and reasoning in OWL ontologies, http://pellet.owldl.com/pronto.
32. PR-OWL: An extension to the OWL language to represent probabilistic ontologies, http://www.pr-owl.org/.