Realist evaluation and randomised controlled trials for testing program theory in complex social systems

Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 270-285

  Hawkins, Andrew J ^a  

^a CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

complex social systems; propensity score matching; Randomised controlled trial (RCT); realist evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978483915     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389016652744     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M.Archer (1998) Realism and morphogenesis. In:. (eds) Critical Realism: Essential Readings. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge, pp.356–381.
2. B.AstburyF.Leeuw (2010) Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation31(3): 363–381.
3. D.Berry (2016) Emerging innovations in clinical trial design. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics99(1): 82–91.
4. R.Bhaskar (2008) A Realist Theory of Science. London, UK: Verso.
5. C.BonellA.FletcherM.Morton. (2012) Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Social Science & Medicine75(12): 2299–2306.
6. C.BonellA.FletcherM.Morton. (2013) Methods don’t make assumptions, researchers do: a response to Marchal et al. Social Science & Medicine94: 81–82.
7. T.CookD.Campbell (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8. A.J.Hawkins (2014) The case for experimental design in realist evaluation. Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts, Special Issue: Evaluation14: 46–59.
9. F.JamalA.FletcherN.Shackleton. (2015) The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example. Trials16(1): 466.
10. B.MarchalG.WesthorpG.Wong. (2013) Realist RCTs of complex interventions – an oxymoron. Social Science & Medicine94: 124–128.
11. R.Mayntz (2004) Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(2): 237–259.
12. S.E.Page (2010) Diversity and Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. R.Pawson (2010) Middle range theory and program theory evaluation: from provenance to practice. In: (eds) Mind the Gap: Perspectives on Policy Evaluation and the Social Sciences. Comparative Policy Evaluation, Volume 16. Piscataway, NJ; London, UK: Transaction Publishers, pp.171–202.
14. R.Pawson (2013) The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
15. R.PawsonN.Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
16. K.R.Popper (2002) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.
17. T.A.Schwandt (2015) Evaluation Foundations Revisited: Cultivating a Life of the Mind for Practice. Berkeley, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. N.Silver (2012) The Signal and the Noise: The Art and Science of Prediction. London, UK: Penguin.
19. D.Snowden (2005) Multi-ontology sense making: a new simplicity in decision making. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics13(1): 45–53.
20. G.Westhorp (2014) Realist Impact Evaluation: An Introduction. Overseas Development Institute Methods Laboratory Report. Available at: https://www.odi.org/publications/8716-methods-lab-realist-impact-evaluation-introduction (accessed 24 May 2016).