A combined approach to women's health is associated with a greater likelihood of repeat mammography in a population of financially disadvantaged women

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Gregory Mercado, Karen Y ^a,b   Will, Julie ^b   True, Susan ^c   Royalty, Janet ^b   Thomas Starcher, E ^d   Khavjou, Olga ^e   Helsel, William ^f   Kammerer, William ^f   Howe, William ^f  

^a Phoenix Health Facilitation Center   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^c Division of Cancer Prevention and Control   (United States)

^d McKing Consulting Corp   (United States)

^e RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^f INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POVERTY; PUBLIC HEALTH; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POVERTY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84978388596     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Henson RM, Wyatt SW, Lee NC. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: a comprehensive public health response to two major health issues for women. J Public Health Manag Pract 1996;2(2):36-47.
2. Cardiovascular disease prevention for women attending breast and cervical cancer screening programs: the WISEWOMAN projects. The WISEWOMAN Workgroup. Prev Med 1999;28(5):496-502.
3. Glasgow RE, Orleans CT, Wagner EH. Does the chronic care model serve also as a template for improving prevention? Milbank Q 2001;79(4):579-612, iv-v.
4. Clark MA, Rakowski W, Bonacore LB. Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment. Ann Behav Med 2003;26(3):201-11.
5. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Hall HI, Briss PA. Nonadherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: what are the linkages to chronic disease risk? Prev Chronic Dis 2004;1(1). www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/jan/03_0015.htm. Accessed August 26, 2006.
6. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. [Published erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55(4):259]. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55(1):10-30.
7. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54(1):41-52.
8. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005. www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/breast-cancer/brcanrr.htm. Accessed December 13, 2005.
9. Bobo JK, Shapiro JA, Schulman J, Wolters CL. On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13(4):620-30.
10. Grady KE, Lemkau JP, McVay JM, Reisine ST. The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women. Prev Med 1992;21(6):766-80.
11. Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11(1):59-71.