Climate model biases in jet streams, blocking and storm tracks resulting from missing orographic drag

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 43, Issue 13, 2016, Pages 7231-7240

  Pithan, Felix ^a   Shepherd, Theodore G ^a   Zappa, Giuseppe ^a   Sandu, Irina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

extratropical circulation; model biases; orographic drag

Indexed keywords

DRAG; STORMS;

ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; COUPLED MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT; EXTRATROPICAL CIRCULATION; IMPORTANT FEATURES; LARGE-SCALE CIRCULATION; MODEL BIAS; OROGRAPHIC BLOCKING; SOUTHERN ANNULAR MODE;

CLIMATE MODELS;

ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; CLIMATE MODELING; DRAG; EXTRATROPICAL ENVIRONMENT; JET STREAM; OROGRAPHIC EFFECT; PARAMETERIZATION; SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE; STORM TRACK;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; ATLANTIC OCEAN (NORTH);

EID: 84978284917     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: 19448007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2016GL069551     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anstey, J. A., P. Davini, L. J. Gray, T. J. Woollings, N. Butchart, C. Cagnazzo, B. Christiansen, S. C. Hardiman, S. M. Osprey, and S. Yang (2013), Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 3956–3971, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50231.
2. Berckmans, J., T. Woollings, M.-E. Demory, P.-L. Vidale, and M. Roberts (2013), Atmospheric blocking in a high resolution climate model: Influences of mean state, orography and eddy forcing, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 14(1), 34–40.
3. Bony, S., et al. (2015), Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity, Nat. Geosci., 8(4), 261–268.
4. Boville, B. A. (1991), Sensitivity of simulated climate to model resolution, J. Clim., 4(5), 469–485.
5. Bracegirdle, T. J., E. Shuckburgh, J.-B. Sallee, Z. Wang, A. J. Meijers, N. Bruneau, T. Phillips, and L. J. Wilcox (2013), Assessment of surface winds over the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Ocean sectors of the Southern Ocean in CMIP5 models: Historical bias, forcing response, and state dependence, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 547–562, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50153.
6. Brayshaw, D. J., B. Hoskins, and M. Blackburn (2009), The basic ingredients of the North Atlantic storm track. Part I: Land-sea contrast and orography, J. Atmos. Sci., 66(9), 2539–2558.
7. Chen, G., and P. Zurita-Gotor (2008), The tropospheric jet response to prescribed zonal forcing in an idealized atmospheric model, J. Atmos. Sci., 65(7), 2254–2271.
8. Chen, G., I. M. Held, and W. A. Robinson (2007), Sensitivity of the latitude of the surface westerlies to surface friction, J. Atmos. Sci., 64(8), 2899–2915.
9. Dee, D., et al. (2011), The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137(656), 553–597.
10. Gerber, E. P., S. Voronin, and L. M. Polvani (2008a), Testing the annular mode autocorrelation time scale in simple atmospheric general circulation models, Mon. Weather Rev., 136(4), 1523–1536.
11. Gerber, E. P., L. M. Polvani, and D. Ancukiewicz (2008b), Annular mode time scales in the intergovernmental panel on climate change fourth assessment report models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22707, doi:10.1029/2008GL035712.
12. Gregory, D., G. Shutts, and J. Mitchell (1998), A new gravity-wave-drag scheme incorporating anisotropic orography and low-level wave breaking: Impact upon the climate of the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 124(546), 463–493.
13. Held, I. M. (1983), Stationary and quasi-stationary eddies in the extratropical troposphere: Theory, in Large-scale Dynamical Processes in the Atmosphere, edited by B. Hoskins and R. Pearce, pp. 127–168, Academic Press, New York.
14. Hodges, K. (1995), Feature tracking on the unit sphere, Mon. Weather Rev., 123(12), 3458–3465.
15. Hodges, K. (1996), Spherical nonparametric estimators applied to the UGAMP model integration for AMIP, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 2914–2932.
16. Hodges, K. (1999), Adaptive constraints for feature tracking, Mon. Weather Rev., 127(6), 1362–1373.
17. Jung, T., et al. (2012), High-resolution global climate simulations with the ECMWF model in Project Athena: Experimental design, model climate, and seasonal forecast skill, J. Clim., 25(9), 3155–3172.
18. Kidston, J., and E. Gerber (2010), Intermodel variability of the poleward shift of the austral jet stream in the CMIP3 integrations linked to biases in 20th century climatology, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09708, doi:10.1029/2010GL042873.
19. Lott, F. (1999), Alleviation of stationary biases in a GCM through a mountain drag parameterization scheme and a simple representation of mountain lift forces, Mon. Weather Rev., 127(5), 788–801.
20. Lott, F., and M. J. Miller (1997), A new subgrid-scale orographic drag parametrization: Its formulation and testing, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 123(537), 101–127.
21. Manabe, S., J. Smagorinsky, J. L. Holloway Jr., and H. M. Stone (1970), Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrologic cycle: III. Effects of increased horizontal computational resolution, Mon. Weather Rev., 98(3), 175–212.
22. Manzini, E., et al. (2014), Northern winter climate change: Assessment of uncertainty in CMIP5 projections related to stratosphere-troposphere coupling, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 7979–7998, doi:10.1002/2013JD021403.
23. McFarlane, N. (1987), The effect of orographically excited gravity wave drag on the general circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 44(14), 1775–1800.
24. Palmer, T., G. Shutts, and R. Swinbank (1986), Alleviation of a systematic westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity wave drag parametrization, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 112(474), 1001–1039.
25. Ring, M. J., and R. A. Plumb (2007), Forced annular mode patterns in a simple atmospheric general circulation model, J. Atmos. Sci., 64(10), 3611–3626.
26. Ring, M. J., and R. A. Plumb (2008), The response of a simplified GCM to axisymmetric forcings: Applicability of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, J. Atmos. Sci., 65(12), 3880–3898.
27. Sandu, I., P. Bechtold, A. Beljaars, A. Bozzo, F. Pithan, T. G. Shepherd, and A. Zadra (2016), Impacts of parameterized orographic drag on the Northern Hemisphere winter circulation, J. Adv. Mod. Earth Syst., 8(1), 196–211, doi:10.1002/2015MS000564.
28. Scaife, A. A., T. Woollings, J. Knight, G. Martin, and T. Hinton (2010), Atmospheric blocking and mean biases in climate models, J. Clim., 23(23), 6143–6152, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3728.1.
29. Scaife, A. A., et al. (2012), Climate change projections and stratosphere-troposphere interaction, Clim. Dyn., 38(9-10), 2089–2097.
30. Scherrer, S. C., M. Croci-Maspoli, C. Schwierz, and C. Appenzeller (2006), Two-dimensional indices of atmospheric blocking and their statistical relationship with winter climate patterns in the Euro-Atlantic region, Int. J. Climatol., 26(2), 233–250.
31. Scinocca, J., and N. McFarlane (2000), The parametrization of drag induced by stratified flow over anisotropic orography, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 126(568), 2353–2393.
32. Shepherd, T. G. (2014), Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in climate change projections, Nat. Geosci., 7(10), 703–708.
33. Simpson, I. R., and L. M. Polvani (2016), Revisiting the relationship between jet position, forced response and annular mode variability in the southern mid-latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2896–2903, doi:10.1002/2016GL067989.
34. Tibaldi, S., and F. Molteni (1990), On the operational predictability of blocking, Tellus A, 42(3), 343–365.
35. van Niekerk, A., T. G. Shepherd, S. B. Vosper, and S. Webster (2016), Sensitivity of resolved and parameterized surface drag to changes in resolution and parameterization, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., doi:10.1002/qj.2821.
36. Vosper, S. (2015), Mountain waves and wakes generated by south georgia: implications for drag parametrization, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 141(692), 2813–2827.
37. Wallace, J. M. (2000), North Atlantic oscillation or annular mode: Two paradigms—One phenomenon, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 126(564), 791–805.
38. Zadra, A., M. Roch, S. Laroche, and M. Charron (2003), The subgrid-scale orographic blocking parametrization of the GEM model, Atmos. Ocean, 41(2), 155–170.
39. Zappa, G., L. C. Shaffrey, and K. I. Hodges (2013), The ability of CMIP5 models to simulate North Atlantic extratropical cyclones, J. Clim., 26(15), 5379–5396.
40. Zappa, G., G. Masato, L. Shaffrey, T. Woollings, and K. Hodges (2014), Linking northern hemisphere blocking and storm track biases in the CMIP5 climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 135–139, doi:10.1002/2013GL058480.