Urban Dynamics Analysis Using Spatial Metrics Geosimulation

GeoJournal Library

Volumn 100, Issue , 2011, Pages 153-167

  Zhao, Yaolong ^a   Murayama, Yuji ^b  

^a SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Land use pattern; Spatial metrics; Urban dynamics; Urban modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978280995     PISSN: 09245499     EISSN: 22150072     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0671-2_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Alberti, M., & Waddell, P. (2000). An integrated urban development and ecological simulation model. Integrated Assessment, 1, 215–227.
2. Antrop, M. (2000). Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15, 257–270.
3. Barnsley, M. J., Moller-Jensen, L., & Barr, S.L. (2001). Inferring urban land use by spatial and structural pattern recognition. In J. P. Donnay, M. J. Barnsley, & P. A. Longley (Eds.), Remote sensing and urban analysis (pp. 115–144). London: Taylor and Francis.
4. Batty, M. (1989). Urban modeling and planning: Reflections, retrodictions and prescriptions. In B. Macmillan (Ed.), Remodeling geography (pp. 147–169). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5. Batty, M. (1994). A chronicle of scientific planning: The Anglo-American modeling experience. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 7–12.
6. Batty, M., & Howes, D. (2001). Predicting temporal patterns in urban development from remote imagery. In J. P. Donnay, M. J. Barnsley, & P. A. Longley (Eds.), Remote sensing and urban analysis (pp. 185–204). London: Taylor and Francis.
7. Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B, 24, 247– 261.
8. Clarke, K. C., Parks, B. O., & Crane, M. P. (2002). Geographic information systems and environmental modeling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Dunn, C. P., Sharpe, D. M., Guntensbergen, G. R., Stearns, F., & Yang, Z. (1991). Methods for analyzing temporal changes in landscape pattern. In M. G. Turner & R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity (pp. 173–198). New York: Springer.
10. Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L. A., & Bockstael, N. E. (1997). Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 23, 251–264.
11. Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T. A., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience, 50, 571–584.
12. Herold, M., Couclelis, H., & Clarke, K. C. (2005). The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 369–399.
13. Herold, M., Goldstein, N. C., & Clarke, K. C. (2003). The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 286–302.
14. Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., et al. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261–269.
15. Lin, G. C. S., & Ho, S. P. S. (2003). China’s land resources and land-use change: Insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy, 20, 87–107.
16. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E. (2002). Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts
17. McKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127, 247–260.
18. Mendelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
19. Milne, B. T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In M. G. Turner & R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity (pp. 199–235). New York: Springer.
20. Parker, D. C., Evans, T. P., & Meretsky, V. (2001). Measuring emergent properties of agent-based landuse/landcover models using spatial metrics. Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the international society for computational economics, Yale University.
21. Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics, 32, 333–365.
22. Qi, Y., & Wu, J. G. (1996). Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology, 11, 39–49.
23. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1964). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
24. Torrens, P. M. (2006). Simulating sprawl. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 248–275.
25. Treitz, P., & Rogan, J. (2004). Remote sensing for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change-an introduction. Progress in Planning, 61, 269–279.
26. Turner, M. G., O’Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., & Milne, B. T. (1989). Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3, 153–162.
27. White, R., Engelen, G., & Uljee, I. (1997). The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modeling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B, 24, 323–343.
28. Wu, J., Jelinski, E. J., Luck, M., & Tueller, P. T. (2000). Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: Scale variance and pattern metrics. Geographic Information Sciences, 6, 6–19.
29. Zhao, Y., & Murayama, Y. (2005). Effect characteristics of spatial resolution on the analysis of urban land-use pattern: a case study of CBD in Tokyo using spatial autocorrelation index. In Y. Murayama, & G. Du (Eds.), Cities in global perspective: Diversity and transition (pp. 585– 594). Tokyo: IGU Urban Commission.
30. Zhao, Y., & Murayama, Y. (2006). Effect of spatial scale on urban land-use pattern analysis in different classification systems: An empirical study in the CBD of Tokyo. Theory and Applications of GIS, 14, 29–42.