Water-related ecosystem services in Western Siberian lowland basins—Analysing and mapping spatial and seasonal effects on regulating services based on ecohydrological modelling results

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 71, Issue , 2016, Pages 55-65

  Schmalz, B ^a   Kruse, M ^a   Kiesel, J ^a   Muller F ^a   Fohrer, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Erosion regulation; Indicators; Quantification; Regional mapping; Siberia; SWAT model; Water flow regulation

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; EROSION; FLOW OF WATER; HYDRAULICS; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS); MAPPING; WATERSHEDS;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; QUANTIFICATION; SIBERIA; SWAT MODEL; WATER FLOWS;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ECOHYDROLOGY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; EROSION CONTROL; FLOW REGULATION; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND MANAGEMENT; LOWLAND ENVIRONMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIVER BASIN; SEASONAL VARIATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

SIBERIA;

EID: 84978246801     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.050     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arnold, J.G., Fohrer, N., SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol. Processes 19 (2005), 563–572.
2. Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., Williams, J.R., Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part I: model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34:1 (1998), 73–89.
3. Beven, K., How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 5:1 (2001), 1–12.
4. Boyanova, K., Nedkov, S., Burkhard, B., Quantification and mapping of flood regulating ecosystem services in different watersheds—case studies in Bulgaria and arizona, USA. Bandrova, T., Konecny, M., Zlatanova, S., (eds.) Thematic Cartography for the Society. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 2014, Springer, 237–255, 10.1007/978-3-319-08180-9_18.
5. Burkhard, B., de Groot, R., Costanza, R., Seppelt, R., Jørgensen, S.E., Potschin, M., Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 1–6.
6. Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., Müller, F., Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands—concepts for spatial localization, indication and quantification. Landscape online 34 (2014), 1–32, 10.3097/LO.201434.
7. CICES (Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services) 2016. Version 4.3. Available under: http://cices.eu/.
8. Chaubey, I., Cotter, A.S., Costello, T.A., Soerens, T.S., Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrol. Processes 19 (2005), 621–628.
9. Cotter, A.S., Chaubey, I., Costello, T.A., Soerens, T.S., Nelson, M.A., Water quality model output uncertainty as affected by spatial resolution of input data. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 39:4 (2003), 977–986.
10. Crossman, N., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 8:1–2 (2012), 1–4.
11. DIN 19708 (DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.), 2005. Bodenbeschaffenheit – Ermittlung der Erosionsgefährdung von Böden durch Wasser mit Hilfe der ABAG (Soil quality – Predicting soil erosion by water by means of ABAG). Zuständiges nationales Arbeitsgremium: NA 119-01-02-03 UA – Standortbeurteilung. In German.
12. ESA, 2010. GlobCover 2009 (Global Land Cover Map), V2.3, 300 m resolution.
13. El-Sadek, A., İrvem, A., Evaluating the impact of land use uncertainty on the simulated streamflow and sediment yield of the Seyhan River basin using the SWAT model. Turk. J. Agric. For. 38 (2014), 515–530.
14. FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISS-CAS/JRC, 2009. Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.1), spatial resolution 1:1 000 000. FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
15. Frank, S., Fürst, C., Witt, A., Koschke, L., Makeschin, F., Making use of the ecosystem services concept in regional planning–trade-offs from reducing water erosion. Landscape Ecol., 2014, 10.1007/s10980-014-9992-3.
16. Gassman, P.W., Reyes, M.R., Green, C.H., Arnold, J.G., The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans. ASABE 50:4 (2007), 1211–1250.
17. Gassman, P.W., Sadeghi, A.M., Srinivasan, R., Applications of the SWAT model special section: overview and insights. J. Environ. Qual. 43:1 (2014), 1–8.
18. Geza, M., McCray, J.E., Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. J. Environ. Manage. 88 (2008), 393–406.
19. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Raffaelli, D.G., Frid, C.L.J., (eds.) Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, 2010, Cambridge University Press, 110–139.
20. Hauck, J., Schweppe-Kraft, B., Albert, C., Görg, C., Jax, K., Jensen, R., Fürst, C., Maes, J., Ring, I., Hönigová, E., Burkhard, B., Mehring, M., Tiefenbach, M., Grunewald, K., Schwarzer, M., Meurer, J., Sommerhäuser, M., Priess, J., Schmidt, J., Grêt-Regamey, A., The promise of the ecosystem services concept for planning and decision-making. GAIA 22:4 (2013), 232–236.
21. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G., Jarvis, A., Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25 (2005), 1965–1978.
22. Hydrological Yearbooks, 1961–1988. Discharge data for the rivers Pyshma (1961–1988), Vagai (1967–1988) and Loktinka (1962–1970).
23. Jarvis, A., Reuter, H.I., Nelson, A., Guevara, E., 2008. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4, available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90 m Database.
24. Kalinin, V., Larin, S., Romanova, I., 1998. Small rivers in anthropogenic influence conditions. TSU, 219 p. (in Russian).
25. Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B., Müller, F., Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecol. Indic. 28 (2013), 54–78.
26. Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B., Müller, F., Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosyst. Serv. 4 (2013), 47–59.
27. Karabulut, A., Egoh, B.N., Lanzanova, D., Grizzetti, B., Bidoglio, G., Pagliero, L., Bouraoui, F., Aloe, A., Reynaud, A., Maes, J., Vandecasteele, I., Mubareka, S., Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem–water–food–energy nexus in the Danube river basin. Ecosyst. Serv. 17 (2016), 278–292.
28. Kiesel, J., Pfannerstill, M., Schmalz, B., Khoroshavin, V., Sheludkov, A., Veshkurseva, T., Fohrer, N., Modelling of hydrological processes in snowmelt-governed permafrost-free catchments of the Western Siberian Lowlands. Hydrology Research, submitted 06/2016. (submitted for publication).
29. Kiesel, J., HRUvis. Python script for visualising the spatial distribution of SWAT parameters on HRU level. 2012, Kalbach-Heubach, Germany unpublished.
30. Kolychalow, O., 2012. Manual reclassification of land use maps classified by Völker & Bicsan, 2011, unpublished.
31. Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Lorenz, M., Witt, A., Frank, S., Makeschin, F., The integration of crop rotation and tillage practices in the assessment of ecosystem services provision at the regional scale. Ecol. Indic. 32 (2013), 157–171.
32. Kroll, F., Müller, F., Haase, D., Fohrer, N., Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 29 (2012), 521–535.
33. Lautenbach, S., Maes, J., Kattwinkel, M., Seppelt, R., Strauch, M., Scholz, M., Schulz-Zunkel, C., Volk, M., Weinert, J., Dormann, C.F., Mapping water quality-related ecosystem services: concepts and applications for nitrogen retention and pesticide risk reduction International Journal of Biodiversity Science. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 8:1–2 (2012), 35–49.
34. Le Maitre, D.C., Kotzee, I.M., O'Farrell, P.J., Impact of land-cover change on the water flow regulation ecosystem service: invasive alien plants, fire and their policy implications. Land Use Policy 36 (2014), 171–181.
35. Lin, S., Jing, C., Chaplot, V., Yu, X., Zhang, Z., Moore, N., Wu, J., Effect of DEM resolution on SWAT outputs of runoff, sediment and nutrients. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 7 (2010), 4411–4435.
36. METI and NASA, 2011. ASTER GDEM (Global Digital Elevation Model), Version 2, spatial resolution: 30 m.
37. Min.Eco.&Nat.Res. (Committee on Geodesy and Cartography of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Russian Federation), 1992. Soil Map of the southern part of Tyumen region 1:300 000.
38. Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., Van Liew, M.W., Bingner, R.L., Harmel, R.D., Veith, T.L., Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 50 (2007), 885–900.
39. Mukundan, R., Radcliffe, D.E., Risse, L.M., Spatial resolution of soil data and channel erosion effects on SWAT model predictions of flow and sediment. J. Soil Water Conserv. 65:2 (2010), 92–104.
40. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), 2014. National climatic data center. Climate data Tyumen station. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ (accessed 07.07.14.).
41. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J.R., 2010. Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Input/Output File Documentation–Version 2009. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory–Agricultural Research Service. Blackland Research Center–Texas AgriLife Research. Texas Water Resources Institute TR-365.
42. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., 2011. Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Theoretical Documentation–Version 2009. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory–Agricultural Research Service. Blackland Research Center–Texas AgriLife Research. Texas Water Resources Institute TR-4062014).
43. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2001. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture–vol. 3: Methods and Results. Glossary, 389–391.
44. Onaindia, M., Fernández de Manuel, B., Madariaga, I., Rodríguez-Loinaz, G., Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. For. Ecol. Manage. 289 (2013), 1–9.
45. Pfannerstill, M., Guse, B., Fohrer, N., A multi-storage groundwater concept for the SWAT model to emphasize nonlinear groundwater dynamics in lowland basins. Hydrol. Processes 28:22 (2014), 5599–5612.
46. Schmalz, B., Kandziora, M., Chetverikova, N., Müller, F., Fohrer, N., Water-related ecosystem services—The Kielstau Basin case study. Chicharo, L., Müller, F., Fohrer, N., (eds.) Ecosystem Services and River Basin Ecohydrology, 2015, Springer, 215–232 ISBN 978–94-017–9845-7.
47. Schmalz, B., Kuemmerlen, M., Kiesel, J., Cai, Q., Jähnig, S.C., Fohrer, N., Impacts of land use changes on hydrological components and macroinvertebrate distributions in the Poyang lake area. Ecohydrology 8:6 (2015), 1119–1136, 10.1002/eco.1569.
48. TyumenStat, 1990–2013. Agriculture Russian Federal Statistics Service. http://www.tumstat.gks.ru (accessed 08.09.14.).
49. Universität Münster (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster), 2014. SASCHA Homepage: http://www.uni-muenster.de/SASCHA/en/index.html (accessed 07.07.14.).
50. Völker, A., Bicsan, A., 2011. Supervised Classification of LANDSAT5 images (acqusition date: May 2009; 30 m per pixel). EFTAS GmbH, Münster/Germany.
51. Vigerstol, K.L., Aukema, J.E., A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. J. Environ. Manage. 92 (2011), 2403–2409.
52. Volk, M., Modelling ecosystem services Challenges and promising future directions. Sustainability Water Qual. Ecol. 1–2 (2014), 3–9, 10.1016/j.swaqe.2014.05.003.
53. Umweltziele und Indikatoren. Wiggering, H., Müller, F., (eds.), 2004, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York p. 670.
54. Williams, J.R., Flood routing with variable travel time or variable storage coefficients. Trans. ASAE 12:1 (1969), 100–103.
55. Williams, J.R., Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resour. Bull. 11 (1975), 965–974.
56. Ye, X., Zhang, Q., Viney, N.R., The effect of soil data resolution on hydrological processes modelling in a large humid watershed. Hydrol. Processes 25 (2011), 130–140.