Stabilizing constructs through collaboration across different research fields as a way to foster the integrative approach of the research domain criteria (RDoC) project

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn 10, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Sullivan, Jacqueline A ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Construct; DSM; Experimental paradigm; Integration; RDoC; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENTIST; STROOP TEST;

EID: 84978199974     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00309     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
2. Bernard, J. A., and Mittal, V. A. (2015). Updating the research domain criteria: the utility of a motor dimension. Psychol. Med. 45, 2685-2689. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715000872
3. Bilder, R., Howe, A., and Sabb, F. (2013). Multilevel models from biology to psychology: mission impossible? J. Abnorm. Psychol. 122, 917-927. doi: 10.1037/a0032263
4. Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
5. Casey, B. J., Oliveri, M. E., and Insel, T. (2014). A neurodevelopmental perspective on the research domain criteria (RDoC) framework. Biol. Psychiatry 76, 350-353. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.006
6. Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress.
7. Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Cuthbert, B., and Insel, T. (2013). Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars ofRDoC. BMC Med. 11:126. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-126
9. Cuthbert, B., and Kozak, M. (2013). Constructing constructs for psychopathology: the NIMH research domain criteria. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 122, 928-937. doi: 10.1037/a0034028
10. Fodor, J. (1968). Psychological Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychology. NewYork, NY: Random House.
11. Lilienfeld, S. (2014). The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): an analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges. Behav. Res. Ther. 62, 129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.019
12. Lilienfeld, S., and Treadway, M. (2016). Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD Versus RDoC. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 12, 435-463. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093122
13. Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
14. Poldrack, R. (2010). "Subtraction and Beyond: The Logic of Experimental Designs for Neuroimaging," in Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping, eds S. Hanson and M. Bunzl (Cambridge: MIT Press), 147-159.
15. Sanislow, C. A., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Kozak, M., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., et al. (2010). Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 119, 631-639. doi: 10.1037/a0020909
16. Simmons, J., and Quinn, K. (2014). The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: implications for genetics research. Mamm. Genome 25, 23-31. doi: 10.1007/s00335-013-9476-9
17. Sullivan, J. (2009). The multiplicity of experimental protocols: a challenge to reductionist and nonreductionist models of the unity of science. Synthese 167, 511-539. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9389-4
18. Sullivan, J. (2010). Reconsidering spatial memory and the morris water maze. Synthese 177, 261-283. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9849-5
19. Sullivan, J. (2014a). "Is the next frontier in neuroscience a decade of the mind," in Brain Theory, ed C. Wolfe (New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan), 45-67.
20. Sullivan, J. (2014b). "Stabilizing mental disorders: prospects and problems," in Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds, eds H. Kincaid and J. Sullivan (Boston, MA: MIT Press), 257-281.
21. WHO (2016). Mental Disorders [Fact Sheet]. Available online at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs396/en/
22. Whooley, O. (2014). Nosological reflections: the failure of DSM-5, the emergence of RDoC, and the decontextualization of mental distress. Soc. Ment. Health 4, 92-110. doi: 10.1177/2156869313519114