Salutogenesis: Contextualising place and space in the policies and politics of recovery from drug dependence

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 33, Issue , 2016, Pages 21-26

  Parkin, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drug policy (UK); Drug treatment; Enabling environments; Recovery capital; Recovery potential; Salutogenesis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; NOTE; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; SALUTOGENESIS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIOLOGY; SUBSTANCE USE; UNITED KINGDOM; SENSE OF COHERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; SENSE OF COHERENCE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84978180028     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: 18734758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.10.002     Document Type: Note

References (57)

1. ACMD, What recovery outcomes does the evidence tell us we can expect?. Second report of the recovery committee, 2013, Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, London.
2. Antonovsky, A., Health, stress and coping. 1979, Jossey-Bass, Washington.
3. Antonovsky, A., Unravelling the mystery of health. 1987, Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco.
4. Antonovsky, A., The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International 11:1 (1996), 11–18.
5. Ashton, M., The new abstentionists. Druglink Special Insert(Dec–Jan Issue), 2008, 1–16.
6. Berridge, V., The rise, fall, and revival of recovery in drug policy. Lancet 379:9810 (2012), 22–23.
7. Best, D., Laudet, A.B., The potential of recovery capital. 2010 RSA Peterborough Recovery Capital Project, Royal Society for the Arts. https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/a4-recovery-capital-230710-v5.pdf Accessed 01 November 2015< https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/a4-recovery-capital-230710-v5.pdf%20Accessed%2001%20November%202015>.
8. Bourdieu, P., Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. 1984, Kegan Paul, London, Routledge.
9. Bourgois, P., Disciplining addictions: The bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 24 (2000), 165–195.
10. Bourgois, P., Schonberg, J., Righteous dopefiend. 2009, University of California Press, Berkeley.
11. Briggs, D., Crack cocaine users: High society and low life in South London. 2011, Routledge, London.
12. Brorson, H.H., Arnevika, E., Rand-Hendriksenc, A., Duckerta, K.F., Drop-out from addiction treatment: A systematic review of risk factors. Clinical Psychology Review 33:8 (2013), 1010–1024.
13. Callaghan, R.C., Cunningham, J.A., Gender differences in detoxification: Predictors of completion and re-admission. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 23:4 (2002), 399–407.
14. Carlson, R.G., Shooting galleries, dope houses and injection doctors: Examining the social ecology of HIV risk behaviours among drug injectors in Dayton, Ohio. Human Organization 59:3 (2000), 325–333.
15. de Certeau, M., The practice of everyday life. 1984, University of California Press, Berkeley.
16. Conahan, J., MacIntyre, D., Responding to the needs of homeless substance abusers: A social business model. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 6:8 (2012), 153–166.
17. Duke, K., Herring, R., Thickett, A., Thom, B., Substitution treatment in the era of “Recovery”: An analysis of stakeholder roles and policy windows in Britain. Substance Use and Misuse 48 (2013), 966–976.
18. Ferres, M., Townshend, T.G., The social, health and wellbeing benefits of allotments: Five societies in Newcastle. Electronic working paper 47, 2012, Newcastle University http://www.ncl.ac.uk/guru/documents/EWP47.pdf (accessed 15 July 2015).
19. Fitzpatrick, K., LaGory, M., Unhealthy Places: The ecology of risk in the urban landscape. 2000, Routledge, London, New York.
20. Fraser, S., The chronotope of the queue: Methadone maintenance treatment and the production of time, space and subjects. International Journal of Drug Policy 17:13 (2006), 192–202.
21. Granfield, R., Cloud, W., Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. 1999, New York University Press, New York, NY.
22. HM Government, Drugs: Protecting families and communities. The 2008–2018 drug strategy. 2008, Home Office, London.
23. HM Government, Drug strategy 2010 reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery. Supporting people to live a drug free life. 2010, Stationery Office, HM Government.
24. Harvey, D., Justice, nature and the geography of difference. 1996, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
25. Linton, S.L., Jennings, J.M., Latkin, C.A., Kirk, G.D., Mehta, S.H., The association between neighborhood residential rehabilitation and injection drug use in Baltimore, Maryland, 2000–2011. Health & Place 28 (2014), 142–149.
26. Lee, A.C., Maheswaran, R.J., The health benefits of urban green spaces: A review of the evidence. Public Health 33:2 (2011), 212–222.
27. Lefebvre, H., The production of space. 1991, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
28. Lindstrom, B., Erikkson, M., Contextualizing salutogenesis and Antonovsky in public health development. Health Promotion International 21:3 (2006), 238–244.
29. McKeganey, N., Controversies in drugs policy and practice. 2011, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
30. McKeganey, N., Barnard, M., AIDS, drugs and sexual risk: Lives in the balance. 1992, Open University Press, Buckingham.
31. McKeganey, N., Neale, J., Parkin, S., Mills, C., Communities and drugs: Beyond the rhetoric of community action. Probation Journal 51:4 (2004), 343–361.
32. Measham, F., Aldridge, J., Parker, H., Dancing on drugs: Risk health and hedonism in the British Club Scene. 2000, Free Association Books, London.
33. Monaghan, M., The recent evolution of UK drug strategies: From maintenance to behaviour change. People, Place and Policy Online 6 (2012), 29–40.
34. Mueser, K.T., Drake, R.E., Turner, W., McGovern, M., Comorbid substance use and psychiatric disorders. Miller, W.R., Carroll, K.M., (eds.) Rethinking substance abuse, 2006, Guilford Press, New York, NY, p115–p133.
35. Neale, J., Drug users in society. 2002, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
36. Neale, J., Nettleton, S., Pickering, L., Gender sameness and difference in recovery from heroin dependence: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (2014), 3–12.
37. Neale, J., Nettleton, S., Pickering, L., Does recovery-oriented treatment prompt heroin users prematurely into detoxification and abstinence programmes? A qualitative study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 127:1–3 (2013), 163–169.
38. O'Malley, P., Consuming risks: Harm minimization and the government of ‘drug-users’. Smandych, R., (eds.) Governable places: Readings on governmentality and crime control, 1999, Ashgate Dartmouth, Aldershot.
39. Parker, H., Aldridge, J., Measham, F., Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. 1998, Routledge, London.
40. Parkin, S., Habitus and drug-using environments: Health, place and lived-experience. 2013, Ashgate Publications Ltd, Farnham.
41. Parkin, S., An applied visual sociology: Picturing harm reduction. 2014, Ashgate Publications Ltd, Farnham.
42. Parkin, S., Coomber, T., ‘Informal sorter houses’: A qualitative insight of the ‘shooting gallery’ phenomenon in the UK. Health and Place 15 (2009), 981–989.
43. Radcliffe, P., Stevens, A., Are drug treatment services only for ‘thieving junkie scumbags’? Drug users and the management of stigmatised identities. Social Science and Medicine 67 (2008), 1065–1073.
44. Rhodes, T., The ‘risk environment’: a framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy 13 (2002), 85–94.
45. Rubin, H.R., Owens, A.J., Golden, G., Status report: An investigation to determine whether the built environment affects patients’ medical outcomes. 1998, The Center for Health Design, Martinez, CA.
46. Sandberg, S., Pedersen, W., Street capital: Black cannabis dealers in a white welfare state. 2011, University of Bristol, Policy Press.
47. Stimson, G., Blair declares war: The unhealthy state of British drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy 11 (2000), 259–264.
48. Taylor, A., Women drug users: An ethnography of a female injecting community. 1993, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
49. Taylor, A., Fleming, A., Rutherford, J., Goldberg, D., Examining the injecting practices of Injecting Drug Users in Scotland. 2004, Effective Interventions Unit, Scottish office, Edinburgh.
50. Thompson, C.W., Landscape quality and quality of life. Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health, 2010, Routledge, London.
51. Thornton, S., Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. 1995, Polity Press, London.
52. Ulrich, R.S., Effects of healthcare environmental design on medical outcomes. 2000, International Academy for Design and Health http://www.capch.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Roger-Ulrich-WCDH2000.pdf (accessed 11 July 2015).
53. Wang, Z., Pukszta, Michael, Petzoldt, Natalie R., Cayton, Jennifer Hendrich, Cancer treatment environments: From pre-design research to post-occupancy evaluation. World Health Design(July), 2011, 68–74.
54. White, W., Cloud, W., Recovery capital: A primer for addiction professionals. Counselor 9:5 (2008), 22–27.
55. White, W., Graham, L., Grassroots recovery: pockets of growth in barren ground. Addiction Today, 2011 http://www.addictiontoday.org/articles/current-affairs/grassroots-recovery-william-white-laura-graham/ (accessed 10 July 2015).
56. Wilkinson, S., Mistral, W., Golding, J., What is most and least useful in residential rehabilitation? A qualitative study of service users and professionals. Journal of Substance Use 13:6 (2008), 404–414.
57. Williams, L., Changing lives, changing drug journeys: Drug taking decisions from adolescence to adulthood. 2013, Routledge, Abingdon, 3996.