Analyzing discourse communities with distributional semantic models

Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Web Science Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages

  Brigadir, Igor ^a   Greene, Derek ^a   Cunningham, Pádraig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS; GEOMETRICAL SPACE; LANGUAGE PATTERNS; NOVEL PATTERNS; POLITICAL CONTEXT; POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES; WORD SEMANTICS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84978145865     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2786451.2786470     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. L. Akoglu. Quantifying political polarity based on bipartite opinion networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2014.
2. L. Anthony. Antconc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit. In Proceedings of IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning, 2005.
3. P. Baker, C. Gabrielatos, M. Khosravinik, M. Krzyżanowski, T. McEnery, and R. Wodak. A useful methodological synergy? combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the uk press. Discourse & Society, 19(3):273-306, 2008.
4. P. Baker, T. McEnery, and C. Gabrielatos. Using collocation analysis to reveal the construction of minority groups: The case of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in the uk press. In Corpus Linguistics, 2007.
5. M. Baroni, G. Dinu, and G. Kruszewski. Don't count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014, June 22-27, 2014, Baltimore, MD, USA, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 238-247, 2014.
6. P. Basile, A. Caputo, and G. Semeraro. Analysing word meaning over time by exploiting temporal random indexing. In CLIC 2014, The Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 38-42, 2014.
7. S. Boulianne. Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5):524-538, 2015.
8. C. Chen, W. L. Buntine, N. Ding, L. Xie, and L. Du. Differential topic models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 37(2):230-242, 2015.
9. K. W. Church and P. Hanks. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1):22-29, 1990.
10. M. Conover, J. Ratkiewicz, M. R. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. Political polarization on twitter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 2011.
11. N. Fairclough. Critical Discourse Analysis: Papers in the Critical Study of Language. Language in social life series. Longman, 1995.
12. J. Firth. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Philological Society, Oxford, 1957.
13. Palmer, F. (ed. 1968) Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, Longman, Harlow.
14. S. Ghosh, M. B. Zafar, P. Bhattacharya, N. Sharma, N. Ganguly, and K. Gummadi. On sampling the wisdom of crowds: Random vs. expert sampling of the twitter stream. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, CIKM '13, pages 1739-1744, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
15. D. Greene, D. O'Callaghan, and P. Cunningham. How many topics? stability analysis for topic models. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases - European Conference, ECML PKDD '14, Nancy, France, pages 498-513, 2014.
16. K. Gulordava and M. Baroni. A distributional similarity approach to the detection of semantic change in the google books ngram corpus. In Proceedings of the GEMS 2011 Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, EMNLP '11, pages 67-71. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011.
17. F. Hill, R. Reichart, and A. Korhonen. SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimation. ArXiv e-prints, Aug. 2014.
18. A. Jungherr. Twitter in politics: a comprehensive literature review. Available at SSRN 2402443, 2014.
19. P. Juola. The time course of language change. Computers and the Humanities, 37(1):77-96, 2003.
20. D. Kreiss. Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns' use of twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society, 2014.
21. V. Kulkarni, R. Al-Rfou, B. Perozzi, and S. Skiena. Statistically significant detection of linguistic change. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '15, pages 625-635, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
22. O. Levy and Y. Goldberg. Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2014, December 8-13 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pages 2177-2185, 2014.
23. H. Lietz, C. Wagner, A. Bleier, and M. Strohmaier. When politicians talk: Assessing online conversational practices of political parties on twitter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2014.
24. W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 3(8):234-281, 1988.
25. T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR, abs/1301.3781, 2013.
26. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. S. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013. Proceedings of a meeting held December 5-8, 2013, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States., pages 3111-3119, 2013.
27. M. J. Paul, C. Zhai, and R. Girju. Summarizing contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '10, pages 66-76, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010.
28. J. Porter. Audience and rhetoric: an archaeological composition of the discourse community. Prentice Hall studies in writing and culture. Prentice Hall, 1992.
29. J. Sinclair. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991.
30. R. Sulo, T. Berger-Wolf, and R. Grossman. Meaningful selection of temporal resolution for dynamic networks. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Mining and Learning with Graphs, MLG '10, pages 127-136, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
31. A. Thanopoulos, N. Fakotakis, and G. Kokkinakis. Comparative evaluation of collocation extraction metrics. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002, May 29-31, 2002, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 2002.
32. Z. Tufekci. Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2014.
33. T. A. Van Dijk. Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 18:352, 2003.
34. R. Wodak. The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, pages 63-94, 2001.
35. M. Zappavigna. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. Bloomsbury Academic. 2012.