Patient's satisfaction after 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: An Italian multicentric study

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-3

  Gentile, Giorgio ^a,b   Franceschelli, Alessandro ^a   Massenio, Paolo ^c   Tuccio, Agostino ^d   Cocci, Andrea ^d   Divenuto, Lucia ^e   Romagnoli, Daniele ^b   Natali, Alessandro ^d   Vitarelli, Antonio ^e   Cormio, Luigi ^c   Colombo, Fulvio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Erectyle dysfunction; Patient satisfaction.

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFLATABLE PENIS PROSTHESIS; ITALY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEYRONIE DISEASE; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PENIS PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ITALY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENILE PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84977764350     PISSN: 11243562     EISSN: 22824197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2016.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lue TF, Giuliano F, Montorsi F, et al. Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men. J Sex Med. 2004; 1:6-23.
2. Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I, et al. EAU Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation, Eur Urol. 2010; 57:804-814.
3. Montague DK. Penile prosthesis implantation in the era of medical treatment for erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2011; 38:217-25.
4. Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthesis infection, J Urol. 1996; 156:402-404.
5. Altof SE, Corty EW, Levine SB, et al. EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for ED. Urology. 1999; 53:793.
6. Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece prosthesis, J Urol. 2007; 177:262-266.
7. Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study, J Urol. 2001; 166:932-937.
8. Mulhall JP, Ahmed A, Branch J, Parker M. Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2003; 169:1429-1433.
9. Bettocchi C, Palumbo F, Spilotros M, et al. Patient and partner satisfaction after AMS inflatable penile prosthesis implant. J Sex Med. 2010; 7:304-309.
10. Villareal HG, Jones L. Outcomes and satisfaction with the inflatable penile prosthesis in the elderly male. Adv Urol. 2012; 240963.
11. Al-Najar A, Naumann CM, Kaufmann S, et al. Should being aged over 70 years hinder penile prosthesis implantation? BJU Int. 2009; 104:834-837.
12. Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece prosthesis. J Urol. 2007; 177:262-6.