Physicochemical analysis of initial adhesion and biofilm formation of Methanosarcina barkeri on polymer support material

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Volumn 143, Issue , 2016, Pages 518-525

  Nguyen, Vi ^a   Karunakaran, Esther ^a   Collins, Gavin ^b   Biggs, Catherine A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Biofilm formation; DLVO model; Initial adhesion; Methanosarcina barkeri; Physicochemical; Support material

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOFILMS; POLYMERS; POLYVINYL CHLORIDES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SEWAGE;

BIOFILM FORMATION; DLVO MODELS; INITIAL ADHESIONS; METHANOSARCINA BARKERI; PHYSICOCHEMICAL; SUPPORT MATERIALS;

ADHESION;

POLITEF; POLYETHYLENE; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; POLYPROPYLENE; POLYVINYLCHLORIDE; POLYVINYLIDENE FLUORIDE; SEWAGE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARCHAEAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; METHANOSARCINA BARKERI; MICROBIAL ADHESION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYNTHESIS; ZETA POTENTIAL; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEWAGE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOFILMS; BIOREACTORS; METHANOSARCINA BARKERI; POLYPROPYLENES; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; POLYVINYL CHLORIDE; SEWAGE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84977671488     PISSN: 09277765     EISSN: 18734367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.042     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. [1] Singh, S.P., Prerna, P., Review of recent advances in anaerobic packed-bed biogas reactors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 (2009), 1569–1575.
2. [2] Adu-Gyamfi, N., Ravella, S.R., Hobbs, P.J., Optimizing anaerobic digestion by selection of the immobilizing surface for enhanced methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 120 (2012), 248–255.
3. [3] Weiland, P., Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85 (2010), 849–860.
4. [4] Gong, W., Liang, H., Li, W., Wang, Z., Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier in anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure. Energy 36 (2011), 3572–3578.
5. [5] Yadvika, T.R., Sreekrishnan, S., Kohli, S., Rana, V., Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques—a review. Bioresour. Technol. 95 (2004), 1–10.
6. [6] Amani, T., Nosrati, M., Sreekrishnan, T.R., Anaerobic digestion from the viewpoint of microbiologicalchemical, and operational aspects—a review. Environ. Rev. 18 (2010), 255–278.
7. [7] Habouzit, F., Hamelin, J., Santa-Catalina, G., Steyer, J.-P., Bernet, N., Biofilm development during the start-up period of anaerobic biofilm reactors: the biofilm archaea community is highly dependent on the support material. Microb. Biotechnol. 7 (2014), 257–264.
8. [8] De Vrieze, J., Hennebel, T., Boon, N., Verstraete, W., Methanosarcina: the rediscovered methanogen for heavy duty biomethanation. Bioresour. Technol. 112 (2012), 1–9.
9. [9] Milkevych, V., Donose, B.C., Juste-Poinapen, N., Batstone, D.J., Mechanical and cell-to-cell adhesive properties of aggregated Methanosarcina. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 126 (2015), 303–312.
10. [10] Lohri, C.R., Rodić, L., Zurbrügg, C., Feasibility assessment tool for urban anaerobic digestion in developing countries. J. Environ. Manage. 126 (2013), 122–131.
11. [11] Ingallinella, A.M., Sanguinetti, G., Koottatep, T., Montanger, A., Strauss, M., The challenge of faecal sludge management in urban areas—strategies, regulations and treatment options. Water Sci. Technol. 46 (2002), 285–294.
12. [12] Abbassi-Guendouz, A., Trably, E., Hamelin, J., Dumas, C., Steyer, J.P., Delgenès, J.-P., et al. Microbial community signature of high-solid content methanogenic ecosystems. Bioresour. Technol. 133 (2013), 256–262.
13. [13] Calli, O., Mertoglu, B., Inanc, B., Yenigun, B., Community changes during start-up in methanogenic bioreactors exposed to increasing levels of ammonia. Environ. Technol. 26 (2005), 85–91.
14. [14] Ahammad, S.Z., Davenport, R.J., Read, L.F., Gomes, J., Sreekrishnan, T.R., Dolfing, J., Rational immobilization of methanogens in high cell density bioreactors. RSC Adv., 3, 2013, 774.
15. [15] Habouzit, F., Gévaudan, G., Hamelin, J., Steyer, J.-P., Bernet, N., Influence of support material properties on the potential selection of archaea during initial adhesion of a methanogenic consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 102 (2011), 4054–4060.
16. [16] Sharma, P.K., Hanumantha Rao, K., Adhesion of Paenibacillus polymyxa on chalcopyrite and pyrite: surface thermodynamics and extended DLVO theory. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 29 (2003), 21–38.
17. [17] Hermansson, M., The DLVO theory in microbial adhesion. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 14 (1999), 105–119.
18. [18] Bos, R., van der Mei, H.C., Busscher, H.J., Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions—its mechanisms and methods for study. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23 (1999), 179–230.
19. [19] Nomura, T., Yoshihara, A., Nagao, T., Tokumoto, H., Konishi, Y., Effect of the surface characteristics of Methanosarcina barkeri on immobilization to support materials. Adv. Powder Technol. 18 (2007), 489–501.
20. [20] van der Mei, H.C., Bos, R., Busscher, H.J., A reference guide to microbial cell surface hydrophobicity based on contact angles. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 11 (1998), 213–221.
21. [21] Busscher, H.J., Weerkamp, A.H., van der Mei, H.C., Antoon, W.J., Van Pelt, A.W., de Jong, H.P., et al. Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48 (1984), 980–983.
22. [22] Hwang, G., Ahn, I.-S., Mhin, B.J., Kim, J.-Y., Adhesion of nano-sized particles to the surface of bacteria: mechanistic study with the extended DLVO theory. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 97 (2012), 138–144.
23. [23] Henze, M., Comeau, Y., Wastewater characterization. Henze, M., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Ekama, G.A., Brdjanovic, D., (eds.) Biological Wastewater Treatment—Principles, Modelling and Design, 2008, IWA Publishing, London, UK, 33–52.
24. [24] Poortinga, A.T., Bos, R., Norde, W., Busscher, H.J., Electric double layer interactions in bacterial adhesion to surfaces. Surf. Sci. Rep. 47 (2002), 1–32.
25. [25] Mukherjee, J., Karunakaran, E., Biggs, C.A., Using a multi-facteted approach to determine the changes in bacterial cell surface properties influenced by a biofilm lifestyle. Biofouling 28 (2012), 1–14.
26. [26] Van Oss, C.J., Chaudhury, M.K., Good, R.J., Interfacial lifshitz-van der waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chem. Rev. 88 (1988), 927–941.
27. [27] Li, B., Logan, B.E., Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 36 (2004), 81–90.
28. [28] Merritt, J.H., Kadouri, D.E., O'Toole, G.A., Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol., 2005 (00 B:1B.1).
29. [29] Roosjen, A., Busscher, H.J., Norde, W., van der Mei, H.C., Bacterial factors influencing adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains to a poly(ethylene oxide) brush. Microbiology 152 (2006), 2673–2682.
30. [30] Verrier, D., Mortier, B., Albagnac, G., Initial adhesion of methanogenic bacteria to polymers. Biotechnol. Lett. 9 (1987), 735–740.
31. [31] Sanchez, J.M., Arijo, S., Munoz, M.A., Morinigo, M.A., Borrego, J.J., Microbial colonization of different support materials used to enhance the methanogenic process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41 (1994), 480–486.
32. [32] van Oss, C.J., Acid–base interfacial interactions in aqueous media. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 78 (1993), 1–49.
33. [33] Busscher, H., Werkamp, A.H., Specific and non-specific interactions in bacterial adhesion to solid substrata. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 46 (1987), 165–173.
34. [34] Hwang, G., Kang, S., El-Din, M.G., Liu, Y., Impact of conditioning films on the initial adhesion of Burkholderia cepacia. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 91 (2012), 181–188.
35. [35] Khan, M.M.T., Ista, L.K., Lopez, G.P., Schuler, A.J., Experimental and theoretical examination of surface energy and adhesion of nitrifying and heterotrophic bacteria using self-assembled monolayers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011), 1055–1060.
36. [36] Wang, H., Sodagari, M., Chen, Y., He, X., Newby, B.Z., Ju, L.-K., Initial bacterial attachment in slow flowing systems: effects of cell and substrate surface properties. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 87 (2011), 415–422.
37. [37] Cerca, N., Pier, G.B., Vilanova, M., Oliveira, R., Azeredo, J., Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Res. Microbiol. 156 (2005), 506–514.
38. [38] Boks, N.P., Norde, W., van der Mei, H.C., Busscher, H.J., Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiology 154 (2008), 3122–3133.
39. [39] Fernández, N., Díaz, E.E., Amils, R., Sanz, J.L., Analysis of microbial community during biofilm development in an anaerobic wastewater treatment reactor. Microb. Ecol. 56 (2008), 121–132.
40. [40] Langer, S., Schropp, D., Bengelsdorf, F.R., Othman, M., Kazda, M., Dynamics of biofilm formation during anaerobic digestion of organic waste. Anaerobe 29 (2014), 44–51.
41. [41] Cheung, H.Y., Sun, S.Q., Sreedhar, B., Ching, W.M., Tanner, P.A., Alterations in extracellular substances during the biofilm development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on aluminium plates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 89 (2000), 100–106.