Enhancing feasibility: Incorporating a socio-ecological systems framework into restoration planning

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 64, Issue , 2016, Pages 83-92

  Budiharta, Sugeng ^a,b   Meijaard, Erik ^a,c   Wells, Jessie A ^a   Abram, Nicola K ^a,c,d   Wilson, Kerrie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES   (Indonesia)

^c Borneo Futures Project   (Indonesia)

^d Living Landscape Alliance   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feasibility; Forest landscape restoration; Indonesia; Kalimantan; Social ecological systems; Spatial prioritisation; Tropical forest

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INDONESIA; LAND USE; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84977649046     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abram, N.K., Meijaard, E., Ancrenaz, M., Runting, R.K., Wells, J.A., Gaveau, D., Pellier, A.-S., Mengersen, K., Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosyst. Serv. 7 (2014), 116–127.
2. Baker, S., Eckerberg, K., Zachrisson, A., Political science and ecological restoration. Environ. Politics 23 (2013), 509–524.
3. Bakker, L., Can We Get Hak Ulayat?: Land and Community in Pasir and Nunukan, East Kalimantan. Ten Years After: Reformasi and New Social Movements in Indonesia, 1998–2008. 2008, University of California, Berkeley.
4. Ban, N.C., Mills, M., Tam, J., Hicks, C.C., Klain, S., Stoeckl, N., Bottrill, M.C., Levine, J., Pressey, R.L., Satterfield, T., Chan, K.M.A., A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11 (2013), 194–202.
5. Basurto, X., Gelcich, S., Ostrom, E., The social-ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries. Glob. Environ. Change 23 (2013), 1366–1380.
6. Baur, I., Adapting to socioeconomic developments by changing rules in the governance of common property pastures in the Swiss Alps. Ecol. Soc., 18(4), 2013, 60.
7. Belcher, B., Rujehan Imang, N., Achdiawan, R., Rattan, rubber, or oil palm: cultural and financial considerations for farmers in Kalimantan. Econ. Bot. 58 (2004), S77–S87.
8. Birch, J.C., Newton, A.C., Aquino, C.A., Cantarello, E., Echeverría, C., Kitzberger, T., Schiappacasse, I., Garavito, N.T., Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (2010), 21925–21930.
9. Blaser, J., Sarre, A., Poore, D., Johnson, S., Status of Tropical forest management. ITTO Technical Series No. 38, 2011, International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama.
10. Boedhihartono, A., Sayer, J., Forest landscape restoration: restoring what and for whom?. Stanturf, J., Lamb, D., Madsen, P., (eds.) Forest Landscape Restoration, 2012, Springer, Netherlands, 309–323.
11. Budiharta, S., Meijaard, E., Erskine, P.D., Rondinini, C., Pacifici, M., Wilson, K.A., Restoring degraded tropical forests for carbon and biodiversity. Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 2014, 114020.
12. Carlson, K.M., Curran, L.M., Ponette-González, A.G., Ratnasari, D., Ruspita Lisnawati, N., Purwanto, Y., Brauman, K.A., Raymond, P.A., Influence of watershed-climate interactions on stream temperature, sediment yield, and metabolism along a land use intensity gradient in Indonesian Borneo. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 119 (2014), 1110–1128.
13. Carwardine, J., Hawkins, C., Polglase, P., Possingham, H.P., Reeson, A., Renwick, A.R., Watts, M., Martin, T.G., Spatial priorities for restoring biodiverse carbon forests. Bioscience 65 (2015), 372–382.
14. Central Bureau of Statistics, National Census 2010. 2014 Available at http://sp2010.bps.go.id/ (accessed 12.11.14).
15. Cottam, G., Curtis, J.T., The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37 (1956), 451–460.
16. Cox, M., Applying a social-ecological system framework to the study of the Taos Valley Irrigation System. Hum. Ecol. 42 (2014), 311–324.
17. Crevello, S.M., Local Land Use on Borneo: Applications of Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Natural Resource Utilization Among the Benuaq Dayak of Kalimantan, Indonesia. PhD Thesis. 2003, The School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University, Louisiana.
18. Dewi, S., Belcher, B., Puntodewo, A., Village economic opportunity, forest dependence, and rural livelihoods in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Dev. 33 (2005), 1419–1434.
19. Egoh, B.N., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Schägner, J.P., Bidoglio, G., Exploring restoration options for habitats, species and ecosystem services in the European Union. J. Appl. Ecol. 51 (2014), 899–908.
20. FAO, State of The Worlds Forests. 2011, Food and Agriculture Organisation of The United Nation, Rome.
21. FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC, Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2). 2012, FAO, IIASA, Rome, Italy, Laxenburg, Austria Available at http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/External-World-soil-database/HTML/ (accessed 25.07.13).
22. Faisal, M., State Structural and Institutional Transformation and the New Dynamics of Business Power, Corruption and Clientelism in Indonesia. PhD Thesis. 2013, School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
23. Fearon, J.D., Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. J. Econ. Growth 8 (2003), 195–222.
24. Fitzherbert, E.B., Struebig, M.J., Morel, A., Danielsen, F., Brühl, C.A., Donald, P.F., Phalan, B., How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23 (2008), 538–545.
25. Gönner, C., Resource Management in a Dayak Benuaq Village: Strategies, Dynamics and Prospects. 2000, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn, Germany.
26. Gönner, C., Surfing on waves of opportunities resource use dynamics in a Dayak Benuaq community in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 24 (2010), 165–173.
27. Gaveau, D.L.A., Sloan, S., Molidena, E., Yaen, H., Sheil, D., Abram, N.K., Ancrenaz, M., Nasi, R., Quinones, M., Wielaard, N., Meijaard, E., Four decades of forest persistence, clearance and logging on Borneo. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e101654.
28. Gingold, B., Rosenbarger, A., Muliastra, Y.I.K.D., Stolle, F., Sudana, I.M., Manessa, M.D.M., Murdimanto, A., Tiangga, S.B., Madusari, C.C., Douard, P., How to Identify Degraded Land for Sustainable Palm Oil in Indonesia. Working Paper. 2012, World Resources Institute and Sekala, Washington D.C Available at http://www.wri.org/resources/maps/suitability-mapper (accessed 23.02.15).
29. Government of Indonesia, Government Regulation No. 35/2002: Reforestation Fund. 2002, Secretary of State of Indonesia, Jakarta.
30. Government of Indonesia, Government Regulation No. 78/2008: Forest Rehabilitation and Reclamation. 2008, Secretary of State of Indonesia, Jakarta.
31. García-Fernández, C., Casado, M.A., Forest recovery in managed agroforestry systems: the case of benzoin and rattan gardens in Indonesia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 214 (2005), 158–169.
32. Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., Ohlson, D., Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices. 2012, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK.
33. Guerrero, A.M., McAllister, R.R.J., Wilson, K.A., Achieving cross-scale collaboration for large scale conservation initiatives. Conserv. Lett. 8 (2014), 107–117.
34. Hansen, M.C., Potapov, P.V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S.A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S.V., Goetz, S.J., Loveland, T.R., Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C.O., Townshend, J.R.G., High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342 (2013), 850–853.
35. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G., Jarvis, A., Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25 (2005), 1965–1978.
36. ISRIC—World Soil Information, SoilGrids: an Automated System for Global Soil Mapping. 2013, ISRIC—World Soil Information Available at http://soilgrids1km.isric.org/ (accessed 02.03.15).
37. Irawan, S., Tacconi, L., Ring, I., Stakeholders' incentives for land-use change and REDD+: the case of Indonesia. Ecol. Econ. 87 (2013), 75–83.
38. Jarvis, A., Reuter, H.I., Nelson, A., Guevara, E., Hole-filled Seamless SRTM data V4. 2008, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) Available at http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org (accessed 04.02.15).
39. Jellinek, S., Rumpff, L., Driscoll, D.A., Parris, K.M., Wintle, B.A., Modelling the benefits of habitat restoration in socio-ecological systems. Biol. Conserv. 169 (2014), 60–67.
40. Kartodihardjo, H., Supriono, A., The Impact of Sectoral Development on Natural Forest Conversion and Degradation: The Case of Timber and Tree Crop Plantations in Indonesia. 2000, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
41. Lamb, D., Erskine, P.D., Parrotta, J.A., Restoration of degraded Tropical forest landscapes. Science 310 (2005), 1628–1632.
42. Lamb, D., Regreening the Bare Hills: Tropical forest restoration in the Asia-pacific region. 2010, Springer Verlag.
43. Law, E.A., Bryan, B.A., Meijaard, E., Mallawaarachchi, T., Struebig, M., Wilson, K.A., Ecosystem services from a degraded peatland of Central Kalimantan: implications for policy, planning, and management. Ecol. Appl. 25 (2014), 70–87.
44. Le, H.D., Smith, C., Herbohn, J., What drives the success of reforestation projects in tropical developing countries?: the case of the Philippines. Glob. Environ. Change 24 (2014), 334–348.
45. Levang, P., Dounias, E., Sitorus, S., Out of the forest, out of poverty?. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 15 (2005), 211–235.
46. McElwee, P., Reforesting Bare Hills in Vietnam: social and environmental consequences of the 5 million hectare reforestation program. AMBIO 38 (2009), 325–333.
47. Meijaard, E., Sheil, D., Oil-palm plantations in the context of biodiversity conservation. Levin, S.A., (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, second ed., 2013, Academic Press, Waltham, 600–612.
48. Meyfroidt, P., Lambin, E.F., Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36 (2011), 343–371.
49. Ministry of Agriculture, Land Suitability Criteria for Agricultural Commodities. 2012, Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Bogor, Indonesia Available at http://bbsdlp.litbang.pertanian.go.id/tamp_komoditas.php (accessed 04.03.15).
50. Ministry of Forestry, Regulation of the Ministry of Forestry P. 37/Menhut-II/2007 on Community Forestry. 2007, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta.
51. Ministry of Forestry, Indonesia's Forest Classification Map 2012. 2012, Forestry Planning Agency, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta, Indonesia.
52. Ministry of Forestry, Indonesia's Forest Concession Map 2011. 2012, Directorate General of Forest Utilization, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta, Indonesia.
53. Ministry of Forestry, Indonesia's Land Cover Map 2010. 2010, Forestry Planning Agency, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta, Indonesia.
54. Ministry of Forestry, Indonesia's Forestry Statistics 2013. 2014, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta, Indonesia.
55. Moilanen, A., Kujala, H., Leathwick, J., The Zonation framework and software for conservation prioritization. Moilanen, A.J., Wilson, K.A., Possingham, H.P., (eds.) Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools, 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 196–210.
56. Moon, K., Adams, V.M., Januchowski-Hartley, S.R., Polyakov, M., Mills, M., Biggs, D., Knight, A.T., Game, E.T., Raymond, C.M., A multidisciplinary conceptualization of conservation opportunity. Conserv. Biol. 28 (2014), 1484–1496.
57. Murniati, Nawir, A.A., Rumboko, L., Gumartini, T., The historical national overview and characteristics of rehabilitation initiatives. Nawir, A.A., Murniati, Rumboko, L., (eds.) Forest Rehabilitation In Indonesia: Where to After More Than Three Decades?, 2007, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia, 75–112.
58. Nagendra, H., Drivers of reforestation in human-dominated forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104 (2007), 15218–15223.
59. Nawir, A.A., Murniati, Rumboko, L., Forest Rehabilitation in Indonesia: Where to after Three Decades?. 2007, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
60. Nawir, A.A., Murniati, Rumboko, L., Hiyama, C., Gumartini, T., Portraits of rehabilitation projects in Indonesia. Nawir, A.A., Murniati, Rumboko, L., (eds.) Forest Rehabilitation in Indonesia: Where to After More Than Three Decades?, 2007, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia, 113–175.
61. Orsi, F., Geneletti, D., Identifying priority areas for Forest Landscape Restoration in Chiapas (Mexico): an operational approach combining ecological and socioeconomic criteria. Landscape Urban Plan. 94 (2010), 20–30.
62. Ostrom, E., Cox, M., Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environ. Conserv. 37 (2010), 451–463.
63. Ostrom, E., A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325 (2009), 419–422.
64. Paser Statistics Service, Paser District in Figures. 2014, Paser Statistics Service, Tana Paser, Indonesia.
65. Paser Statistics Service, Publications by Paser Statistics Service. 2014, Paser Statistics Service, Tana Paser, Indonesia.
66. Peluso, N.L., Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode 27 (1995), 383–406.
67. Poffenberger, M., People in the forest: community forestry experiences from Southeast Asia. Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Dev. 5 (2006), 57–69.
68. Putz, F.E., Zuidema, P.A., Synnott, T., Pena-Claros, M., Pinard, M.A., Sheil, D., Vanclay, J.K., Sist, P., Gourlet-Fleury, S., Griscom, B., Palmer, J., Zagt, R., Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: the attained and the attainable. Conserv. Lett. 5 (2012), 296–303.
69. Ritung, S., Wahyunto, Agus, F., Hidayat, H., Land Suitability Evaluation with a Case Map of Aceh Barat District. 2007, Indonesian Soil Research Institute and World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor, Indonesia.
70. Runting, R.K., Meijaard, E., Abram, N.K., Wells, J.A., Gaveau, D.L.A., Ancrenaz, M., Posssingham, H.P., Wich, S.A., Ardiansyah, F., Gumal, M.T., Ambu, L.N., Wilson, K.A., Alternative futures for Borneo show the value of integrating economic and conservation targets across borders. Nat. Commun. 6 (2015), 6819–6829.
71. Ruslandi, Venter, O., Putz, F.E., Overestimating conservation costs in Southeast Asia. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9 (2011), 542–544.
72. Saragih, B., Economic Value of Non-timber Forest Products Among Paser Indigenous People of East Kalimantan. Centre for Environmental Science (CML). 2011, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University. Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherland.
73. Sardjono, M.A., Devung, S., Imang, N., Local community dimension of indonesian forest policy and customary land tenure in East Kalimantan. Commoners and the changing commons: livelihoods, environmental security, and shared knowledge. The Fourteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Mt. Fuji, Japan, 2013.
74. Sodhi, N.S., Lee, T.M., Koh, L.P., Brook, B.W., A meta-analysis of the impact of anthropogenic forest disturbance on Southeast Asia's Biotas. Biotropica 41 (2009), 103–109.
75. Sumarga, E., Hein, L., Benefits and costs of oil palm expansion in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, under different policy scenarios. Reg. Environ. Change, 2015, 1–11.
76. Wells, J.A., Meijaard, E., Abram, N., Wich, S., Forests, Floods, People and Wildlife on Borneo. 2013, UNEP, Bangkok, Thailand.
77. Wilson, K.A., Lulow, M., Burger, J., McBride, M.F., The economics of restoration. Stanturf, J., Lamb, D., Madsen, P., (eds.) Forest Landscape Restoration, 2012, Springer, Netherlands, 215–231.