Network layer inter-operation of Device-to-Device communication technologies in Internet of Things (IoT)

Ad Hoc Networks

Volumn 57, Issue , 2017, Pages 52-62

  Bello, Oladayo ^a   Zeadally, Sherali ^b   Badra, Mohamad ^c  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c ZAYED UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Bluetooth; Device to Device; Internet of Things; Interoperability; IPv6; PLC; RFID; Zigbee

Indexed keywords

BLUETOOTH; ECOSYSTEMS; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; INTEROPERABILITY; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; NETWORK LAYERS; PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS; RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID); ZIGBEE;

DEVICE TO DEVICES; DEVICE-TO-DEVICE COMMUNICATIONS; DEVICETO-DEVICE (D2D) COMMUNICATION; DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS; INTERNET OF THING (IOT); INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); IPV6; RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 84977640990     PISSN: 15708705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. [1] IEEE Standards Association “Internet of Things Ecosystem Study” Available: http://standards.ieee.org/innovate/iot/study.html.
2. [2] Apcar, J., The Internet of Things, powered by IPv6. Available: iDA IPv6 Conference[Online], 2014 https://www.ida.gov.sg/∼/media/Images/Infocomm%20Landscape/Technology/IPv6/download/JeffApcar.pdf.
3. [3] Sorrell, S., IoT-Internet of Transformation. Available: Juniper Research [Online], 2015 http://www.juniperresearch.com/document-library.
4. [4] Andersson, M., Short-range Low Power Wireless Devices and Internet of Things (IoT). Wireless Congress 2013: Systems & Applications, Munich, Germany, 2013.
5. [5] Bello, O., Zeadally, S., Communication issues in the Internet of Things. Next Generation Wireless Technologies: 4 G and Beyond, 2013, Springer, London, 189–219.
6. [6] Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things. Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelfflé, S., (eds.) Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things, 2010, Cluster of the European Research Projects on the Internet of Things ISBN 9789279150883.
7. [7] Reiter, G., Wireless connectivity for the Internet of Things. One Size Does Not Fit All, 2014, Texas Instruments [Online] Available: http://www.ti.com/lit/wp/swry010.
8. [8] Chase, J., The Evolution of the Internet of Things. 2013, Texas Instruments. [Online] Available: http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/swrb028.
9. [9] Zeadally, S., Khan, S., Chilamkurti, N., Energy-efficient networking: past, present, and future. J. Supercomput., 62(3), 2012.
10. [10] Palattella, M.R, Accettura, N., Vilajosana, X., Watteyne, T., Grieco, L.A., Boggia, G., Dohler, M., Standardized protocol stack for the Internet of (Important) Things. Commun. Surv. Tut. IEEE, Third Quart. 15:3 (2013), 1389–1406.
11. [11] Caraguay, Á.L.V., Peral, A.B., López, L.I.B., Villalba, L.J.G., SDN: evolution and opportunities in the development IoT applications. Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw. [online], 2014, 2014 Article ID 735142.
12. [12] Legare, C., Reworking the TCP/IP stack for use on embedded IoT devices. Available: Presented at Embedded Systems Conference [Online], 2014 http://www.eetindia.co.in.
13. [13] Mazhelis, O., Waldburger, M., Machado, G.S., Stiller, B., Tyrväinen, P., Extending Monitoring and Accounting Infrastructure Towards Constrained Devices in Internet-of-Things Applications., 2013, University of Zurich [online] Technical Report, Available: https://www.merlin.uzh.ch/contributionDocument/download/5076.
14. [14] Francesca, P., Donato, B., Lorenzo, B., Andrea, B., Santina, T.M., Blefari, M.N., On the IP support in IEEE 802.15.4 LR-WPANs: self-configuring solutions for real application scenarios. Proc. 9th IFIP Annual Med-Hoc-Net, France, June 23–25, 2010, 1–10.
15. [15] Pope, J., Simon, R., The impact of packet fragmentation and reassembly in resource constrained wireless networks. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. [Online], CIT 21:2 (2013), 97–107 Available: http://cit.srce.unizg.hr/index.php/CIT/article/view/2195.
16. [16] Kang, N., Park, J., Kwon, H., Jung, S., ). ESSE: efficient secure session establishment for internet-integrated wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw. [Online], 2015.
17. [17] Bormann, C., Ersue, M., Keranen, A., Terminology for Constrained-Node Networks. RFC7228, ISSN 2070–1721, 2014.
18. [18] Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY). Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). IEEE 802.15.4-2006, 2006.
19. [19] Kim, E., Kaspar, D., Vasseur, J.P., Design and Application Spaces for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs). RFC6568, ISSN: 2070–1721, 2012.
20. [20] Venkatesh, N., Ensuring coexistence of IoT wireless protocol: using a convergence module to avoid contention. Accelerating the Internet of Things, 12th ed., 2015, Embedded Innovator, 32–35 Available: intel.com/embedded-innovator.
21. [21] R. Cepeda, “The IoT Generation will need 5G”Available: www.interdigital.com/post/5g-and-iot–two-sides-of-the-same-coin.
22. [22] Serrano, M., Barnaghi, P., Carrez, F., Cousin, P., Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Internet of Things: IoT Semantic Interoperability:Research Challenges, Best Practices, Recommendations and Next Steps. 2015, European Research Cluster on The Internet of Things.
23. [23] Jung, M., Weidinger, J., Reinisch, C., Kastner, W., Crettaz, C., Bocchi, Y., Crettol, O., A transparent IPv6 multi-protocol gateway to integrate building automation systems in the Internet of Things. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things, Besancon, France, 2012.
24. [24] Ashton, S., Zigbee's new IP specification for IPv6 6LoPAN wireless network designs. 2013, Silicon Labs [Online] Available: http://www.embedded.com/print/4419558.
25. [25] Silicon labs, “Bringing the IoT to Life,” Available: www.silabs.com/pages/Silabs-Search.aspx? q=bringing the IoT to life.
26. [26] Hui, J.W., Culler, D.E., IPv6 in low-power wireless networks. Proc of the IEEE, 98, 2010, 1865–1878.
27. [27] Mariager, P., Petersen, J., Shelby, Z., van de Logt, M., Barthel, D., Transmission of IPv6 Packets over DECT Ultra Low Energy. IETF Internet Draft, 2015 (Status: Informational), draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-03.txt.
28. [28] ETSI EN 300 175-5, Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT); Common Interface (CI); Part 5: Network (NWK) layer. 2015 Version 2.6.1 Available: https://portal.etsi.org.
29. [29] P1901.2a/D0.3, IEEE Approved Draft Standard for Low-Frequency (less than 500 kHz) Narrowband Power Line Communications for Smart Grid Applications - Amendment 1, 2015.
30. [30] Breaking Down Silos, The Value Of A Standards-Based Approach To Smart Metering And Smart Grid, 2013 Available: www.cisco.com or www.itron.com.
31. [31] Popa, D., Hui, J., 6LoPLC: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 1901.2 Narrowband Powerline Communication Networks. IETF Internet Draft, 2014 (Status: Informational), draft-popa-6lo-6loplc-ipv6-over-ieee19012-networks-00.txt.
32. [32] Pereira, P., “Building an Interoperable Grid with Industry Standard IPv6 Architecture. CIGRE Colloquium, India, 2013.
33. [33] Sheng, Q., Zeadally, S., Luo, Z., Chung, J., Maamar, Z., Ubiquitous RFID: where are we?. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Front., 12(5), 2010.
34. [34] Sheng, Q., Li, X., Zeadally, S., Enabling next-generation RFID applications: solutions and challenges. IEEE Computer, 41(9), 2008.
35. [35] Wu, Y., Sheng, Q., Shen, H., Zeadally, S., Modeling object flows from distributed and federated rfid data streams for efficient tracking and tracing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 24(10), 2013.
36. [36] Rahman, L.F., Reaz, M.B.I., Ali, M.A.A., Marufuzzaman, M., Alam, M.R., Beyond the WiFi: introducing RFID system using IPv6. Proc. Kaleidoscope: Beyond the Internet? Innovations for Future Networks and Services, ITU-T, Pune, 2010, 1–4.
37. [37] Bluetooth Specification Version 4.1, Vol 0, 03 December 2013.
38. [38] Savolainen, T., Bluetooth 4.0 update to 4.1 and what it means for IPv6 over bluetooth low-energy. Presentation at IETF 6lo WG meeting at IETF, 89, 2014 draft-ietf-6lo-btle-00.
39. [39] Nieminen, J., Savolainen, T., Isomaki, M., Patil, B., Shelby, Z., Gomez, C., Transmission of IPv6 Packets over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy. IETF Internet Draft, 2014 (Status: Informational), draft-ietf-6lo-btle-02.
40. [40] Thomas, N., Thomson, S., Jinmei, T., IPv6 Stateless Address Auto Configuration. RFC 4862, 2007.
41. [41] Bluetooth® Low Energy, Litepoint [Online], Available: www.litepoint.com/whitepaper/Bluetooth%20Low%20Energy_WhitePaper.pdf.
42. [42] Zigbee IP specification, 12-0572-10, ZigBee Alliance. Available:, 2013 www.zigbee.org/Specifications/ZigBeeIP/Download.aspx.
43. [43] ZigBee Wireless Sensor Applications for Health, Wellness and Fitness. 2009, Zigbee Alliance Available: www.zigbee.org.
44. [44] Yen, L.H., Tsai, W.T., Flexible address configurations for tree-based ZigBee/IEEE 802.15.4 wireless networks. Proc. 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Okinawa, Japan, 2008, 395–402.
45. [45] Thaler, D., 6LoWPAN Privacy Considerations. IEFT Internet-Draft, 2015 (Status: Informational), draft-thaler-6lo-privacy-considerations-00.txt.
46. [46] Bormann, C., 6LoWPAN Generic Compression of Headers and Header-like Payloads. IETF Internet-Draft, 2014 (Status: Standards Track), draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-01.txt.
47. [47] Hummen, R., Hiller, J., Wirtz, H., Henze, M., Shafagh, H., Wehrle, K., 6LoWPAN Fragmentation Attacks and Mitigation Mechanisms. Proc. of the sixth ACM conference on Security and privacy in wireless and mobile networks, New York, NY, USA, 2013, 55–66.
48. [48] Bormann, C., Adaptation Layer Fragmentation Indication. IEFT Internet-Draft, 2013 (Status: Standards Track), draft-bormann-intarea-alfi-04. txt.
49. [49] Das, S.K, Kant, K., Zhang, N., Handbook on Securing Cyber-Physical Critical Infrastructure. 2012, Elsevier.
50. [50] O. Bello and S. Zeadally, “Intelligent Device-to-Device communication in the Internet of Things (IoT)”, to appear in IEEE Systems Journal, 2016.
51. [51] Oteafy, S.M.A, Al-Turjman, F.M., Hassanein, H.S., Pruned adaptive routing in the heterogeneous Internet of Things. Proc IEEE GLOBECOM, 2012, 214–219.
52. [52] GSM Association. IoT Device Connection Efficiency Common Test Cases. CLP.09, Version 2.0, 01, 2015.
53. [53] Wu, J., Xiao, M., Huang, L., Homing spread: community home-based multi-copy routing in mobile social networks. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2013, 2319–2327.
54. [54] Minoli, D., Building the Internet of Things with IPv6 and MIPv6: The Evolving World of M2M Communications. 2013, Wiley publications.
55. [55] Cisco IOS Software Configuration Guide, Release 12.2SX, Cisco Systems.
56. [56] Younis, O., Fahmy, S., Constraint-Based Routing in the internet: basic principles and recent research. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut. 5:3 (2003), 2–13.
57. [57] Baccelli, E., Mehlis, C., Hahm, O., Information centric networking in the IoT: experiments with NDN in the wild. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on ICN, New York, USA, 2014, 77–86.
58. [58] Bokor, L., Huszak, A., Jeney, G., Novel results on SCTP multihoming performance in native IPv6 UMTS and WLAN environments. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Distrib. Syst. 5:1/2 (2010), 25–45.
59. [59] Siddiqui, F., Zeadally, S., SCTP multihoming support for handoffs across heterogeneous networks. Proc. 4th Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference, 2006, 8–16.
60. [60] Jara, A.J., Ladid, L., Skarmeta, A., The Internet of Everything through IPv6: an analysis of challenges, solutions and opportunities. J. Wireless Mob. Netw. Ubiquit. Comput. Dependable Appl. 4:3 (2013), 97–118.
61. [61] Heer, T., Garcia-Morchon, O., Hummen, R., Keoh, S.L., Kumar, S.S., Wehrle, K., Security challenges in the IP-based Internet of Things. J. Wireless Personal Comm. 61:3 (2011), 527–542.
62. [62] Muraleedharan, R., Osadciw, L.A., Increasing QoS and security in 4G networks using cognitive intelligence. Proc. IEEE Globecom Workshops, 2007, 1–6 ISSN: 2166-007.
63. [63] Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M., Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29:7 (2013), 1645–1660.
64. [64] Nef, M.-A., Perlepes, L., Karagiorgou, S., Stamoulis, G.I., Kikiras, P.K., Enabling QoS in the Internet of Things. Proc. Fifth International Conference on Communication Theory, Reliability, and Quality of Service, Chamonix/Mont Blanc, France, 2012, 33–38.
65. [65] Liu, N.X., Baras, J.S., Modelling multi-dimensional QoS: some fundamental constraints. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 17:3 (2004), 193–215.
66. [66] Li, L., Rong, M., Zhang, G., "An Internet of things QoS estimate approach based on multi-dimension QoS. Proc. 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Vancouver, BC, 2014, 998–1002.
67. [67] N. Sanadi, “Understanding W2CM: How an FPGA-based blade answers the call for next-generation user-plane testing”. [Online]. Available: http://www.exfo.com/solutions/bu1-simulation-load-testing/policy-charging-control.
68. [68] J. Algar, “Cisco: Video, Internet-of-Things, mobile are prime drivers of Internet use”. [Online]. Available: http://www.techtimes.com/articles/8271/20140611/cisco-video-mobile-big-internet-use.htm.