On the role of operations research practice in strategic environmental impact assessment

International Transactions in Operational Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 445-456

  Clímaco, João ^a,b   Craveirinha, José ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b INESC COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Ethics; Multicriteria decision support; Strategic environmental impact assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977568245     PISSN: 09696016     EISSN: 14753995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00726.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. ANSEA. 2002. Towards an Analytical Strategic Environmental Assessment. Tau Consultora Ambiental, Madrid.
2. Castoriadis, C., 2000. Pour un individu autonome. Manière de Voir – Le Monde Diplomatique 52, 14–17.
3. Clímaco, J., 2004. A critical reflection on optimal decision. European Journal of Operational Research 153, 506–517.
4. Damart, S., Roy, B., 2007. Limitations of cost–benefit analysis to support public debate: the case of public transportation decision-making in France. Cahier du LAMSADE 252.
5. Dryzek, J.S., 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Habermas, J., 1974. The public sphere: An encyclopedic article. New German Critique 3, 49–55.
7. Laboratorio Nacional de Engenharia Civil (LNEC). 2008. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica do Estudo para Análise Comparada das Alternativas de Localização do Novo Aeroporto de Lisboa na Zona da Ota e na Zona do Campo de Tiro de Alcochete. LNEC, Report 21/2008-DT.
8. Lourenço, R.P., 2007. Sistemas de Apoio à Participação Pùblica – um modelo de escrita em colaboração, Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Economy, University of Coimbra (in Portuguese).
9. Munda, G., 2008. Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
10. Pfeffer, J.P., 1992. Managing with Power. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
11. Roy, B., 1999. Decision-aiding today: What should we expect? In Gal, T., et al. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making – Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 1–35.
12. Sadler, B., Verheem, R., 1996. Strategic Environmental Assessment: status, challenges and future directions. Report no. 53, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague, the Netherlands.
13. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Resource Manual to Support Application of the Protocol on SEA, ChapterA5: overview of basic tools for SEA. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available at http://www.unece.org/env/eia/sea_manual/ (accessed 30 November 2009).