Unconventional gas developments and the politics of risk and knowledge in Australia

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 20, Issue , 2016, Pages 82-90

  Espig, Martin ^a   de Rijke, Kim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anthropology of energy; Coal seam gas; Expert lay discrepancy; Fracking; Risk society; Unsettled science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977562839     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. [1] Adam, B., van Loon, L., Introduction: repositioning risk—the challenges for social theory. Adam, B., Beck, U., van Loon, L., (eds.) The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues in Social Theory, 2000, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi, 1–31.
2. [2] Aitken, M., Wind power planning controversies and the construction of ‘expert’ and ‘lay’ knowledges. Sci. Cult. 18:1 (2009), 47–64.
3. [3] Arnoldi, J., Risk: An Introduction. 2009, Polity Press, Cambridge & Maiden.
4. [4] Barnes, J., Uncertainty in the signal: modelling Egypt's water futures. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 22:S1 (2016), 46–66.
5. [5] Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. 1992, SAGE Publications, London, Newbury Park & New Delhi.
6. [6] Beck, U., World Risk Society. 1999, Polity Press, Cambridge & Malden.
7. [7] Beck, U., World at Risk. 2009, Polity Press, Cambridge & Malden.
8. [8] Biersack, A., The Mount Kare python and his gold: totemism and ecology in the Papua New Guinea Highlands. Am. Anthropol. 101 (1999), 68–87.
9. [9] Cartwright, E., Eco-risk and the case of fracking. Strauss, S., Rupp, S., Love, T., (eds.) Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, 2013, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, 201–212.
10. [10] Commonwealth of Australia, Review of the Socioeconomic Impacts of Coal Seam Gas in Queensland. 2015, Office of the Chief Economist; Department of Industry, Innovation and Science; Australian Government, Canberra.
11. [11] Cook, P., Beck, V., Brereton, D., Clark, R., Fisher, B., Kentish, S., Toomey, J., Williams, J., Engineering Energy: Unconventional Gas Production—A Study of Shale Gas in Australia. 2013, Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA), Melbourne.
12. [12] GISERA, Coal Seam Gas Developments—Predicting Impacts. 2014, Gas Industry Social & Environmental Research Alliance (GISERA), Australia.
13. [13] de Rijke, K., Coal seam gas and social impact assessment: an anthropological contribution to current debates and practices. J. Econ. Soc. Policy, 15(3), 2013 Article 3.
14. [14] de Rijke, K., Hydraulically fractured: unconventional gas and anthropology. Anthropol. Today 29:2 (2013), 13–17.
15. [15] de Rijke, K., The agri-gas fields of Australia: black soil, food, and unconventional gas. Cult. Agric. Food Environ. 35:1 (2013), 41–53.
16. [16] de Rijke, K., Munro, P., Melo Zurita, M., The Great Artesian Basin: a contested resource environment of subterranean water and coal seam gas in Australia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 29:6 (2016), 696–710.
17. [17] Dilley, R., Kirsch, G., (eds.) Regimes of Ignorance: Anthropological Perspectives on the Production and Reproduction of Non-Knowledge, 2015, Berghahn Books, New York & Oxford.
18. [18] Douglas, M., Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Danger and Taboo. 1966, Routledge, London.
19. [19] Douglas, M., Wildavsky, A., Risk and Culture. 1982, University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles.
20. [20] Ericson, R.V., Haggerty, K.D., Policing the Risk Society. 1997, University of Toronto Press, Toronto & Buffalo.
21. [21] Espig, M., de Rijke, K., Navigating coal seam gas fields: ethnographic challenges in Queensland, Australia. Pract. Anthropol., 38(3), 2016 forthcoming, summer.
22. [22] Evensen, D., Policy decisions on shale gas development (‘fracking’): the insufficiency of science and necessity of moral thought. Environ. Values 24 (2015), 511–534.
23. [23] Evensen, D., Jacquet, J.B., Clarke, C.E., Stedman, R.C., What's the ‘fracking’ problem? One word can not say it all. Extr. Ind. Soc. 1:2 (2014), 130–136.
24. [24] Everingham, J., Collins, N., Rodriguez, D., Cavaye, J., Vink, S., Rifkin, W., Baumgartl, T., Energy Resources from the Food Bowl: An Uneasy Coexistence. Identifying and Managing Cumulative Impacts of Mining and Agriculture. 2013, CSRM, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
25. [25] Everingham, J.A., Devenin, V., Collins, N., The beast doesn't stop: the resource boom and changes in the social space of the Darling Downs. Rural Soc. 24:1 (2015), 42–64.
26. [26] Franklin, S., Science as culture, cultures of science. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 24 (1995), 163–184.
27. [27] Giddens, A., Runaway World: How Globalisation is Reshaping Our Lives. 2002, Profile Books, London.
28. [28] Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. Gross, M., McGoey, L., (eds.), 2015, Routledge, Abingdon & New York.
29. [29] Hudgins, A., Fracking's future in a coal mining past: subjectivity undermined. Cult. Agric. Food Environ. 35:1 (2013), 54–59.
30. [30] International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2013 Factsheet: How Will Global Energy Markets Evolve to 2035?. 2013, International Energy Agency, Paris.
31. [31] Irwin, A., Sociology and the Environment. 2001, Routledge, London & New York.
32. [32] Knoblauch, H., Focused ethnography. Forum: Qual. Soc. Res., 6(3), 2005 Art. 44.
33. [33] Latour, B., Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. 1987, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
34. [34] Ledesma, D., Henderson, J., Palmer, N., The Future of Australian LNG Exports. 2014, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford.
35. [35] Lloyd, D.J., Luke, H., Boyd, W.E., Community perspectives of natural resource extraction: coal-seam gas mining and social identity in Eastern Australia. Coolabah 10 (2013), 144–164.
36. [36] Lockie, S., Social nature: the environmental challenge to mainstream social theory. White, R., (eds.) Controversies in Environmental Sociology, 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 26–42.
37. [37] Luke, H., den Exter, K.A., Boyd, W.E., Lloyd, D.J., Roche, B., Developing the lismore CSG poll—a university/local government collaboration. J. Econ. Soc. Policy, 15(3), 2013 Art. 6.
38. [38] Lyons, K., ‘Partner or Perish’? The convergence of public and private interests pose new questions for controversial university science research. Chain Reaction(June), 2014 Magazine of Friends of the Earth Australia.
39. [39] Lyons, K., Richards, C., Mining the integrity out of Australian universities?. Arena(124), 2013, 7–9.
40. [40] Lysaght, T., Kerridge, I., Rhetoric, power and legitimacy: a critical analysis of the public policy disputes surrounding stem cell research in Australia (2005–6). Public Underst. Sci. 21:2 (2012), 195–210.
41. [41] Mair, J., Kelly, A.H., High, C., Introduction: making ignorance and ethnographic object. High, C., Kelly, A.H., Mair, J., (eds.) The Anthropology of Ignorance: An Ethnographic Approach, 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, New York & Basingstoke, 1–32.
42. [42] Makki, M., Coal Seam Gas Development and Community Conflict: A Comparative Study of Community Responses to Coal Seam Gas Development in Chinchilla and Tara, Queensland. Doctoral Thesis. 2015, University of Queensland, School of Communication and Arts.
43. [43] Marchand, T.H.J., Making knowledge: explorations of the indissoluble relation between minds, bodies, and environment. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 16:s1 (2010), 1–21.
44. [44] Marcus, G.E., Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 24:1 (1995), 95–117.
45. [45] McCarthy, E.D., Knowledge as Culture: the New Sociology of Knowledge. 1996, Routledge, New York.
46. [46] Mercer, A., de Rijke, K., Dressler, W., Silences in the boom: coal seam gas, neoliberalizing discourse, and the future of regional Australia. J. Polit. Ecol. 21 (2014), 279–302.
47. [47] Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power, and Knowledge. Nader, L., (eds.), 1996, Routledge, New York & London.
48. [48] Nader, L., The Energy Reader. 2010, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.
49. [49] O'Reilly, J., Sensing the ice: field science, models, and expert intimacy with knowledge. J. Royal Anthropol. Inst. 22:S1 (2016), 27–45.
50. [50] OGIA, Underground Water Impact Report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area—Consultation Draft., 2016, The Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment, Department of Natural Resources and Mines; State of Queensland, Brisbane.
51. [51] Pink, S., Morgan, J., Short-term ethnography: intense routes to knowing. Symb. Interact. 36:3 (2013), 351–361.
52. [52] Randall, A., Coal seam gas—toward a risk management framework for a novel intervention. Environ. Plan. Law J. 29:2 (2012), 152–162.
53. [53] Reno, J., Beyond risk: emplacement and the production of environmental evidence. Am. Ethnol. 38:3 (2011), 516–530.
54. [54] Richardson, T., Weszkalnys, G., Resource materialities. Anthropol. Q. 87:1 (2014), 5–30.
55. [55] Roscoe, P.B., The perils of ‘Positivism’ in cultural anthropology. Am. Anthropol. 97:3 (1995), 492–504.
56. [56] Rouse, J., Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically. 1996, Cornell University Press, Ithaca & London.
57. [57] Rouse, J., Vampires: social constructivism, realism, and other philosophical undead. Hist. Theory 41:1 (2002), 60–78.
58. [58] Ryan, S.E., Hebdon, C., Dafoe, J., Energy research and the contributions of the social sciences: a contemporary examination. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 3 (2014), 186–197.
59. [59] Sarewitz, D., How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ. Sci. Policy 7 (2004), 385–403.
60. [60] Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K., von Savigny, E., (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 2001, Routledge, London & New York.
61. [61] Schneider, J., Frackademia, divestment, and the limits of academic freedom. Paper Presented at the Conference on Communication and the Environment, International Environmental Communication Association, Boulder, Co. June 13, 2015.
62. [62] Sherval, M., Hardiman, K., Competing perceptions of the rural idyll: responses to threats from coal seam gas development in Gloucester, NSW, Australia. Aust. Geogr. 45:2 (2014), 185–203.
63. [63] Short, D., Elliot, J., Norder, K., Lloyd-Davies, E., Morley, J., Extreme energy, ‘fracking’ and human rights: a new field for human rights impact assessments?. Int. J. Hum. Rights 19:6 (2015), 697–736.
64. [64] Simonelli, J., Home rule and natural gas development in New York: civil fracking rights. J. Polit. Ecol. 21:1 (2014), 258–278.
65. [65] Sovacool, B.K., Ryan, S.E., Stern, P.C., Janda, K., Rochlin, G., Spreng, D., Pasqualetti, M.J., Wilhite, H., Lutzenhiser, L., Integrating social science in energy research. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6 (2015), 95–99.
66. [66] Stehr, N., Knowledge, democracy and power. Cent. Eur. J. Public Policy 4:1 (2010), 14–35.
67. [67] Stehr, N., Knowledge and non-knowledge science. Technol. Innov. Stud. 8:1 (2012), 3–13.
68. [68] Strauss, S., Rupp, S., Love, T., (eds.) Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, 2013, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
69. [69] Swayne, N., Regulating coal seam gas in Queensland: lessons in an adaptive environmental management approach?. Environ. Plan. Law J. 29:2 (2012), 163–185.
70. [70] Trigger, D., Keenan, J., de Rijke, K., Rifkin, W., Aboriginal engagement and agreement-making with a rapidly developing resource industry: coal seam gas development in Australia. Extr. Ind. Soc. 1:2 (2014), 176–188.
71. [71] Tuckwell, E., Science in dispute: debating the authority of knowledge in an environmental contestation. Oceania 82:3 (2012), 308–322.
72. [72] Walton, A., McCrea, R., Leonard, R., Williams, R., Resilience in a changing community landscape of coal seam gas: Chinchilla in Southern Queensland. J. Econ. Soc. Policy, 15(3), 2013 Art. 3.
73. [73] Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., Curtis, S., Framing ‘fracking’: exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Underst. Sci., 2015, 1–17 Published online before print 13 July 2015.
74. [74] Werner, A.K., Vink, S., Watt, K., Jagals, P., Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: a review of the current strength of evidence. Sci. Total Environ. 505 (2015), 1127–1141.
75. [75] Willow, A.J., Wylie, S., Politics, ecology: and the new anthropology of energy: exploring the emerging frontiers of hydraulic fracking. J. Polit. Ecol. 21 (2014), 222–236.
76. [76] Wolske, K., Hoffman, A., Public perceptions of high-volume hydraulic fracturing and deep shale gas development. Graham Sustainability Institute Integrated Assessment Report Series, vol. 2, 2013, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Report 8.
77. [77] Yearley, S., Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. 2005, SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi.