Decision-making for delivery location and quality of care among slum-dwellers: A qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Sudhinaraset, May ^a   Beyeler, Naomi ^a   Barge, Sandhya ^b   Diamond Smith, Nadia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Centre for Operations Research and Training   (India)

Author keywords

Child health; Health providers; India; Maternal health; Quality of care; Social support; Urban health; Urbanization

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DECISION MAKING; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDIA; INTERVIEW; JOINT; MALE; MATERNAL WELFARE; MOTHER; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SAMPLING; SANITATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; URBANIZATION; ADULT; FAMILY SIZE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICE; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; URBAN POPULATION;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIA; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; POVERTY; POVERTY AREAS; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 84977520478     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0942-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Diamond-Smith N, Sudhinaraset M. Drivers of facility deliveries in Africa and Asia: regional analyses using the demographic and health surveys. Reprod Health. 2015;12:6.
2. Randive B, Diwan V, De Costa A. India's Conditional Cash Transfer Programme (the JSY) to Promote Institutional Birth: Is There an Association between Institutional Birth Proportion and Maternal Mortality? PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Jul 31];8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3694862/. Accessed 5 July 2016.
3. The World Bank. World Bank Data: Infant Mortality Rate [Internet]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN/countries. Accessed 5 July 2016.
4. Key Indicators for Uttar Pradesh from NFHS-3 [Internet]. Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); ICF Macro; Available from: http://www.rchiips.org/nfhs/pdf/Uttar%20Pradesh.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2016.
5. Kishor S, Gupta K. Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment in India [Internet]. Calverton: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); ICF Macro; 2009. Available from: http://www.rchiips.org/NFHS/a_subject_report_gender_for_website.pdf.
6. Singh KK, Bloom SS, Tsui AO. Husbands' reproductive health knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in Uttar Pradesh, India. Stud Fam Plann. 1998;29:388-99.
7. Essendi H, Mills S, Fotso J-C. Barriers to formal emergency obstetric care services' utilization. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med. 2011;88(2):S356-69.
8. World Urbanization Prospectives: The 2014 Revision, Highlights [Internet]. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2014. Available from: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2016.
9. Bruce SG, Blanchard AK, Gurav K, Roy A, Jayanna K, Mohan HL, et al. Preferences for infant delivery site among pregnant women and new mothers in Northern Karnataka, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:49.
10. Medhi D. In Her Husband's family: a newly Wed Woman's expectations and Her New Family's attitudes in rural Assam, India. J Int Womens Stud. 2013;4:107-16.
11. Singh A, Ram F. Men's Involvement during Pregnancy and Childbirth: Evidence from Rural Ahmadnagar, India. Popul. Rev. [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2015 Jul 31];48. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/population_review/v048/48.1.singh.html. Accessed 5 July 2016.
12. Blanchard AK, Bruce SG, Jayanna K, Gurav K, Mohan HL, Avery L, et al. An exploration of decision-making processes on infant delivery site from the perspective of pregnant women, New mothers, and their families in northern Karnataka, India. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:2074-80.
13. Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014;11:71.
14. Modugu HR, Kumar M, Kumar A, Millett C. State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for birth deliveries in India. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1048.
15. Gopalan SS, Varatharajan D. Addressing maternal healthcare through demand side financial incentives: experience of Janani Suraksha Yojana program in India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:319.
16. Thind A, Mohani A, Banerjee K, Hagigi F. Where to deliver? Analysis of choice of delivery location from a national survey in India. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:29.
17. Saikia N, Singh A. Does types of household affect maternal health? Evidence from India. J Biosoc Sci. 2009;41:329-53.
18. Bloom SS, Wypij D, Das GM. Dimensions of women's autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography. 2001;38:67-78.
19. World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/134588/1/WHO_RHR_14.23_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1. Accessed 5 July 2016.